Compare Feedback Studio and Quetext 
- Reviewers mention that Feedback Studio excels in its Itemized Reporting feature, scoring 9.7, which allows users to get detailed insights into their submissions, while Quetext's reporting feature, although solid, scores lower at 8.9.
- Users report that Feedback Studio's Proprietary Database is highly effective, achieving a score of 9.3, which enhances its plagiarism detection capabilities, whereas Quetext's proprietary database scores 8.8, indicating a slight edge for Feedback Studio in this area.
- G2 users highlight that Quetext offers a more user-friendly experience, with an Ease of Use score of 9.3 compared to Feedback Studio's 8.9, making it a preferred choice for those new to plagiarism detection software.
- Users on G2 report that Feedback Studio's Quality of Support is rated at 8.2, which is decent, but Quetext outperforms it with a score of 8.8, suggesting that users may find better assistance with Quetext.
- Reviewers mention that Feedback Studio's Academic Databases feature is particularly strong, scoring 9.5, which is beneficial for educational institutions, while Quetext's score of 8.8 indicates it may not be as robust in this area.
- Users say that both products are browser applications, but Feedback Studio scores slightly higher at 9.4 for Browser Application usability compared to Quetext's 9.2, suggesting a marginally better experience in web-based functionality.
I like that it scans for plagiarism automatically. I like that it is easy to use - definitely user-friendly. It will allow users to upload two documents and compare against the internet and internally stored documents for plagiarism reviews.
Grading and feedback in Turnitin... in particular the stability of the user interface in the browser, is at times extremely bad. Using any browser, the grading page for a student will often lock up while created a quickmark, resulting in much lost time and...
The deepsearch technology of the tool is very impressive. The plagiarism results are mostly accurate with the links at our disposal to see where exactly the sentances match with our content. The report feature is another good thing about the tool, which...
It takes a while to get results, I usually switch tabs and let it do its thing
I like that it scans for plagiarism automatically. I like that it is easy to use - definitely user-friendly. It will allow users to upload two documents and compare against the internet and internally stored documents for plagiarism reviews.
The deepsearch technology of the tool is very impressive. The plagiarism results are mostly accurate with the links at our disposal to see where exactly the sentances match with our content. The report feature is another good thing about the tool, which...
Grading and feedback in Turnitin... in particular the stability of the user interface in the browser, is at times extremely bad. Using any browser, the grading page for a student will often lock up while created a quickmark, resulting in much lost time and...
It takes a while to get results, I usually switch tabs and let it do its thing
