Compare Esri ArcGIS and Google Earth Pro 
- Users report that Esri ArcGIS excels in Data Manipulation with a score of 9.0, allowing for complex data transformations and analyses, while Google Earth Pro, with a score of 8.1, is seen as more limited in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Esri ArcGIS offers superior Spatial Analysis capabilities, scoring 9.3 compared to Google Earth Pro's 8.5, making it a preferred choice for users needing in-depth geographic insights.
- G2 users highlight the Map Design features of Esri ArcGIS, which scored 9.1, as being more robust and customizable than Google Earth Pro's offerings, which do not provide the same level of detail and flexibility.
- Users on G2 say that Google Earth Pro shines in Ease of Use with a score of 8.9, making it more accessible for beginners compared to Esri ArcGIS, which has a lower score of 7.3 in this category.
- Reviewers mention that Esri ArcGIS provides a more comprehensive Data Visualization experience, scoring 9.0, while Google Earth Pro matches this score but lacks some advanced visualization features that users find beneficial in ArcGIS.
- Users report that the Quality of Support is slightly better for Google Earth Pro, with a score of 8.2 compared to Esri ArcGIS's 8.1, indicating that users may find more responsive assistance with Google’s product.
- Plans are renewed on a yearly basis.
- Technical Support is included as part of the subscription.
- Service credits are consumed when you use certain services in Esri's cloud, such as geocoding, hosted feature or tile services, or spatial analysis.
I like that I can use ArcGIS to communicate with fellow scientist all over the world about a specific area I am researching. We can share updated updated maps and data instantly. I like that Esri also makes softwares such as Collector and Survey123 to work...
The costs of this software are enormous for the initial purchase price and the subsequent yearly fees for the product. Not having recent quotes, but in the past pricing for Standard and Advanced licensing were $7,000 and $12,000 respectively for initial...
How easy it is to pinpoint location and the clarity of the images. Wherever the coordinates are, I am clearly able to move around and find anything I need.
Some of the capabilities are awkward, and the movements of the Earth can be nauseating. Some of these features can be changed, but it seems difficult to figure out what works best.
I like that I can use ArcGIS to communicate with fellow scientist all over the world about a specific area I am researching. We can share updated updated maps and data instantly. I like that Esri also makes softwares such as Collector and Survey123 to work...
How easy it is to pinpoint location and the clarity of the images. Wherever the coordinates are, I am clearly able to move around and find anything I need.
The costs of this software are enormous for the initial purchase price and the subsequent yearly fees for the product. Not having recent quotes, but in the past pricing for Standard and Advanced licensing were $7,000 and $12,000 respectively for initial...
Some of the capabilities are awkward, and the movements of the Earth can be nauseating. Some of these features can be changed, but it seems difficult to figure out what works best.
