G2 reviewers report that Teamcenter excels in user experience, with many praising its intuitive design that simplifies access to crucial data. Users appreciate how it consolidates everything in one location, making decision-making easier for teams.
According to verified reviews, Teamcenter significantly outperforms ENOVIA in terms of overall satisfaction, reflected in its high G2 Score. Reviewers highlight Teamcenter's ability to maintain revision records of product files, which enhances productivity and organization.
Users say that Teamcenter's implementation process is notably quick and efficient, with many recent users mentioning the intuitive onboarding wizard that facilitates a smoother transition compared to ENOVIA, which has received less recent feedback on its setup experience.
Reviewers mention that while ENOVIA offers strong reporting and analytics capabilities, Teamcenter's document retrieval system is particularly praised for its speed and efficiency. Users find it easy to retrieve documents and drawings, which is crucial for maintaining workflow.
G2 reviewers highlight Teamcenter's superior support quality, with users noting that the platform has been a reliable partner in business operations. In contrast, ENOVIA's support has received mixed feedback, indicating room for improvement in this area.
Users report that both platforms have robust BOM management features, but Teamcenter's integration with CAD software like NX is a standout feature that enhances its usability for engineering teams, making it a preferred choice for those needing seamless design collaboration.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ENOVIA
No pricing available
Teamcenter
Teamcenter X Standard
Contact Us
MCAD data management
Structure management with revisions in CAD software
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.