- Home
- ...
- Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) Software
- ENOVIA
- Ideagen Quality Control
- ENOVIA-vs-Ideagen Quality Control
Compare ENOVIA and Ideagen Quality Control 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Mid-Market (52.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
ENOVIA
Star Rating
(75)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (52.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ENOVIAIdeagen Quality Control
Star Rating
(98)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (52.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Ideagen Quality ControlSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Reviewers mention that ENOVIA excels in CAD Models and CAD Options, scoring 8.9 and 8.7 respectively, which is significantly higher than Ideagen Quality Control's scores of 4.7 in both categories. This makes ENOVIA a better choice for organizations that heavily rely on CAD integration.
- Users report that Ideagen Quality Control has a superior Ease of Use rating of 8.8 compared to ENOVIA's 7.1. This suggests that users find Ideagen's interface more intuitive and user-friendly, making it a preferable option for teams looking for quick adoption.
- G2 users highlight that ENOVIA's Quality Planning and Compliance features are particularly strong, with scores of 9.0 and 9.4, respectively. In contrast, Ideagen Quality Control scores 7.0 and 8.1 in these areas, indicating that ENOVIA may be more effective for organizations focused on stringent quality management processes.
- Users on G2 report that Ideagen Quality Control shines in its Quality of Support, scoring 8.5, while ENOVIA's score of 7.5 suggests that users may experience less responsive support. This could be a critical factor for businesses that require reliable assistance.
- Reviewers say that ENOVIA's BOM visualization feature is highly rated at 9.2, which is a significant advantage for teams needing detailed bill of materials management. Ideagen Quality Control, however, scores only 5.7 in this area, indicating a potential gap in functionality for users focused on BOM management.
- Users report that ENOVIA's Product Metadata and Version Control features are robust, with scores of 8.8 and 8.8, respectively, which are essential for effective product data management. In contrast, Ideagen Quality Control's Product Metadata score of 4.3 suggests limitations in this critical area.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ENOVIA
No pricing availableIdeagen Quality Control
No pricing availableFree Trial
ENOVIA
No trial information availableIdeagen Quality Control
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.3
50
9.0
89
Ease of Use
7.1
50
8.8
91
Ease of Setup
6.0
24
8.4
76
Ease of Admin
6.5
24
7.9
21
Quality of Support
7.5
48
8.6
85
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
6.9
25
8.3
20
Product Direction (% positive)
7.0
50
9.1
88
Features by Category
Planning
Not enough data
8.3
68
Not enough data
7.9
70
Not enough data
7.2
66
Not enough data
7.3
67
Execution
Not enough data
7.5
66
Not enough data
6.8
64
Not enough data
7.6
71
Not enough data
8.2
74
Not enough data
6.8
64
Analytics
Not enough data
7.1
65
Not enough data
6.7
63
Not enough data
7.0
64
New Product Introduction
8.2
14
6.7
5
8.0
14
|
Verified
7.0
5
8.6
12
|
Verified
5.3
5
8.6
14
|
Verified
7.7
5
CAD
8.9
15
|
Verified
4.7
5
8.7
15
|
Verified
4.7
5
8.3
15
|
Verified
5.3
5
Collaboration
8.1
15
|
Verified
6.3
5
8.2
14
|
Verified
6.7
5
8.2
14
|
Verified
7.0
5
8.6
12
|
Verified
6.9
6
Product Data Management
8.8
12
|
Verified
4.3
5
8.5
14
|
Verified
7.7
5
8.8
14
|
Verified
9.0
5
Bill of Materials
8.4
15
|
Verified
6.0
5
8.6
14
|
Verified
5.7
5
9.4
13
|
Verified
5.7
5
9.2
13
5.7
5
Engineering Change Management
8.8
14
|
Verified
7.3
5
8.9
14
|
Verified
8.3
5
9.0
13
|
Verified
6.7
5
Simulation
8.3
13
6.3
5
8.5
12
|
Verified
6.0
5
8.6
11
7.7
5
Analytics
8.5
14
|
Verified
7.6
7
8.1
12
|
Verified
5.7
5
8.6
12
|
Verified
5.7
5
Quality management
9.0
12
|
Verified
7.0
5
9.0
12
|
Verified
8.6
6
9.4
13
|
Verified
8.1
7
Integration
8.7
13
5.7
5
8.5
12
6.3
5
8.3
11
|
Verified
5.3
5
9.4
11
|
Verified
6.7
5
Generative AI
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Feature Not Available
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ENOVIA and Ideagen Quality Control are categorized as Product Lifecycle Management (PLM)
Unique Categories
ENOVIA is categorized as Simulation and Test Suite
Ideagen Quality Control is categorized as Inspection Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ENOVIA
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Ideagen Quality Control
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
14.9%
Airlines/Aviation
14.9%
Aviation & Aerospace
13.4%
Oil & Energy
10.4%
Automotive
10.4%
Other
35.8%
Aviation & Aerospace
33.0%
Manufacturing
27.8%
Airlines/Aviation
11.3%
Medical Devices
5.2%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
5.2%
Other
17.5%
Most Helpful Reviews
ENOVIA
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Michael C.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
The improvements and features added to ENOVIA over the past few releases have really propelled it to the lead as a world class enterprise PLM platform. From document and project management, to multi-CAD integration and BOM management and now a terrific new...
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Aviation & Aerospace
Sometimes it takes many many clicks to achieve a step and it’s not as user friendly as it should be
Ideagen Quality Control
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Nicholas H.
Verified User in Aviation & Aerospace
Comparing drawings feature is great and saves me a ton of time on FAIRs due to upreved drawings
Most Helpful Critical Review
Louis G.
Verified User in Medical Devices
Lack of development compared to alternative products. The Q-Pulse FAIR system hasn't changed since 2016! No automatic ballooning, no test plan generation, no automatic field population, OCR isn't great latest system allows for change of FAIR completion...
Michael C.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
The improvements and features added to ENOVIA over the past few releases have really propelled it to the lead as a world class enterprise PLM platform. From document and project management, to multi-CAD integration and BOM management and now a terrific new...
Nicholas H.
Verified User in Aviation & Aerospace
Comparing drawings feature is great and saves me a ton of time on FAIRs due to upreved drawings
Verified User in Aviation & Aerospace
Sometimes it takes many many clicks to achieve a step and it’s not as user friendly as it should be
Louis G.
Verified User in Medical Devices
Lack of development compared to alternative products. The Q-Pulse FAIR system hasn't changed since 2016! No automatic ballooning, no test plan generation, no automatic field population, OCR isn't great latest system allows for change of FAIR completion...
Alternatives
Discussions
ENOVIA has no discussions with answers
Ideagen Quality Control has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
