Compare Docker and runc 
- Users report that Docker excels in deployment capabilities with a score of 9.3, making it easier to manage containerized applications compared to runc, which lacks a dedicated deployment feature.
- Reviewers mention that Docker's self-healing high availability feature scores 8.2, providing robust reliability, while runc does not offer similar built-in high availability options, which can be a drawback for users needing consistent uptime.
- G2 users highlight Docker's orchestration capabilities with a score of 8.5, allowing for seamless management of multiple containers, whereas runc's orchestration support is limited, making it less suitable for complex applications.
- Users on G2 appreciate Docker's automatic security updates, scoring 8.6, which enhances security without manual intervention, while runc's security update process is less automated, potentially increasing vulnerability risks.
- Reviewers say that Docker's quality of support is rated at 8.4, indicating a strong support system, while runc's support quality is lower at 7.3, which may lead to challenges for users needing assistance.
- Users report that Docker's product direction is highly rated at 9.4, suggesting a strong commitment to future development, while runc's lower score of 6.5 indicates less confidence in its ongoing evolution and support.
I've been evaluating docker since mid-2015 and it's the most comprehensive open source platform I've tried. Creating containers is very simple, automation and deployment of applications within containers works intuitively and enhances the user experience as...
The automated image build tools are the main reason this would be worth paying for and they are quite poor. The lack features and development seems to be very slow. Some time back Docker bought up a company making something like this, so perhaps that's...
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
How we must construct or export filesystem bundles from other systems to create their own starting point for a container. It is also the They also will need to put together the JSON configuration file that has similar "knobs" related to various
I've been evaluating docker since mid-2015 and it's the most comprehensive open source platform I've tried. Creating containers is very simple, automation and deployment of applications within containers works intuitively and enhances the user experience as...
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
The automated image build tools are the main reason this would be worth paying for and they are quite poor. The lack features and development seems to be very slow. Some time back Docker bought up a company making something like this, so perhaps that's...
How we must construct or export filesystem bundles from other systems to create their own starting point for a container. It is also the They also will need to put together the JSON configuration file that has similar "knobs" related to various
