- Home
- ...
- Container Registry Software
- Docker hub
- IBM Cloud Container Registry
- Docker hub-vs-IBM Cloud Container Registry
Compare Docker and IBM Cloud Container Registry 
- Users report that Docker excels in deployment flexibility, with a score of 9.3, allowing for seamless integration across various environments, while IBM Cloud Container Registry, although robust, does not match this level of deployment versatility.
- Reviewers mention that Docker's ease of use is rated at 8.7, making it more user-friendly for small businesses, whereas IBM Cloud Container Registry has a lower ease of use score of 7.8, which some users find challenging when onboarding new team members.
- G2 users highlight Docker's strong self-healing high availability feature, scoring 8.2, which ensures minimal downtime, while IBM Cloud Container Registry lacks this specific capability, leading to potential service interruptions.
- Users on G2 appreciate Docker's orchestration capabilities, rated at 8.5, which streamline container management, whereas IBM Cloud Container Registry's orchestration features are not as comprehensive, resulting in a less efficient workflow for users.
- Reviewers say that Docker's automatic security updates, rated at 8.6, provide peace of mind for users concerned about vulnerabilities, while IBM Cloud Container Registry's security update features, although present, do not offer the same level of automation, leading to potential lapses in security.
- Users report that Docker's product direction is highly rated at 9.4, indicating a strong commitment to innovation and user feedback, while IBM Cloud Container Registry, with a score of 9.0, shows a solid direction but may not be as responsive to user needs as Docker.
I've been evaluating docker since mid-2015 and it's the most comprehensive open source platform I've tried. Creating containers is very simple, automation and deployment of applications within containers works intuitively and enhances the user experience as...
The automated image build tools are the main reason this would be worth paying for and they are quite poor. The lack features and development seems to be very slow. Some time back Docker bought up a company making something like this, so perhaps that's...
The tool is amazing and I like its capabilities. The tool is easy to use, affordable, offers lots of features, and the user interface is one of the best.
Little dissapointment with the UX of IBM Cloud container and there is not enough tutorials or documentation which can help newbies to implement on it .
I've been evaluating docker since mid-2015 and it's the most comprehensive open source platform I've tried. Creating containers is very simple, automation and deployment of applications within containers works intuitively and enhances the user experience as...
The tool is amazing and I like its capabilities. The tool is easy to use, affordable, offers lots of features, and the user interface is one of the best.
The automated image build tools are the main reason this would be worth paying for and they are quite poor. The lack features and development seems to be very slow. Some time back Docker bought up a company making something like this, so perhaps that's...
Little dissapointment with the UX of IBM Cloud container and there is not enough tutorials or documentation which can help newbies to implement on it .
