When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found DBeaver easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with DBeaver overall.
It's free and it works! Simply as that, I have struggled for years try to find in vain an SQL manager that works with all my engines, and when I heard about DBeaver, I though, why not, at the end, the only that I would may lose is time. But I was really...
I haven't found a good way to end a query that's taking too long to run or may have been run by mistake. You basically have to kill the whole program. Not the prettiest UI
It is a very nice tool to monitor databases especially if you are using Postgres SQL, It provides a lot of functionality in UI which you have to write queries if you want to do that in the Terminal. It gives an outlook of the servers, their databases, and...
There is everything to dislike about this, on top of that this is not at all user friedly. Its user interface is wierd, Microsoft SQL is way better.
It's free and it works! Simply as that, I have struggled for years try to find in vain an SQL manager that works with all my engines, and when I heard about DBeaver, I though, why not, at the end, the only that I would may lose is time. But I was really...
It is a very nice tool to monitor databases especially if you are using Postgres SQL, It provides a lot of functionality in UI which you have to write queries if you want to do that in the Terminal. It gives an outlook of the servers, their databases, and...
I haven't found a good way to end a query that's taking too long to run or may have been run by mistake. You basically have to kill the whole program. Not the prettiest UI
There is everything to dislike about this, on top of that this is not at all user friedly. Its user interface is wierd, Microsoft SQL is way better.