Compare D2iQ and Kubernetes 
- Users report that Kubernetes excels in its orchestration capabilities, with a score of 9.6, which reviewers mention allows for seamless management of containerized applications across clusters. In contrast, D2iQ's orchestration score of 8.1 indicates it may not be as robust in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Kubernetes offers superior access control features, scoring 8.7 compared to D2iQ's 6.5. Users appreciate Kubernetes' ability to manage permissions effectively, which is crucial for enterprise environments.
- G2 users highlight Kubernetes' strong container networking capabilities, scoring 9.0, which reviewers say facilitates efficient communication between containers. D2iQ, with a score of 7.4, may not provide the same level of networking flexibility.
- Users on G2 report that D2iQ shines in quality of support, achieving a score of 9.2, which reviewers mention as a significant advantage for teams needing assistance. Kubernetes, while still strong at 8.4, may not match the personalized support experience offered by D2iQ.
- Reviewers mention that Kubernetes has a more favorable product direction score of 9.7, indicating a strong roadmap and future enhancements, while D2iQ's score of 8.7 suggests it may not be as forward-thinking in its development strategy.
- Users say that Kubernetes' developer toolkit, scoring 8.6, provides a comprehensive set of tools for developers, which is essential for building and deploying applications. D2iQ's score of 7.1 indicates it may lack some of the advanced features that developers seek.
I love that I can spin up a cluster using industry-standard tools in minutes and, without any configuration, have a centralized dashboard and logging capability for all my managed k8s clusters. Also, once installed, you communicate with your clusters the...
Performance - Stability, reliability and compatibility issues in 1.8 version.
Kubernetes is a sweet spot between flexibility and simplicity. Especially service discovery is made very simple. Competitors often are either to simple (Docker compose, swarm, fleet) or too complex (Marathon). Once it is up and running, low-level...
It's extremely immature (very buggy), the networking is just...painful, the scheduler is dumb and slow; those are my technical dislikes. My personal dislike is the overall lack of cohesive documentation as well as the assertion that just because there...
I love that I can spin up a cluster using industry-standard tools in minutes and, without any configuration, have a centralized dashboard and logging capability for all my managed k8s clusters. Also, once installed, you communicate with your clusters the...
Kubernetes is a sweet spot between flexibility and simplicity. Especially service discovery is made very simple. Competitors often are either to simple (Docker compose, swarm, fleet) or too complex (Marathon). Once it is up and running, low-level...
Performance - Stability, reliability and compatibility issues in 1.8 version.
It's extremely immature (very buggy), the networking is just...painful, the scheduler is dumb and slow; those are my technical dislikes. My personal dislike is the overall lack of cohesive documentation as well as the assertion that just because there...
![Yiorgos [George] A.](/assets/transparent-ad5be28fbcd25b7b08d2cebe1d957125437fb5407d75ee717965ad22c8808791.gif "Yiorgos [George] A.")
