Compare Cypress and FitNesse 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (42.2% of reviews)
Enterprise (56.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
No pricing available
Cypress
Star Rating
(105)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (42.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 5 pricing plansFitNesse
Star Rating
(27)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (56.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about FitNesseSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Cypress excels in ease of use with a score of 9.3, making it highly accessible for developers, while FitNesse has a lower score of 8.1, indicating a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Reviewers mention that Cypress offers superior test automation capabilities, particularly with its real-time reload feature, which allows for immediate feedback during testing, whereas FitNesse's automation features are less intuitive and require more manual setup.
- G2 users highlight Cypress's robust test history tracking, which provides detailed insights into past test runs, while FitNesse's test history features are considered less comprehensive, making it harder to analyze previous results effectively.
- Users on G2 appreciate Cypress's high-quality support, scoring 8.8, with many noting the helpfulness of the community and documentation, in contrast to FitNesse, which received a lower support score of 7.6, indicating potential delays in assistance.
- Reviewers say that Cypress shines in its product direction, with a positive score of 9.5, suggesting a strong commitment to continuous improvement and feature updates, while FitNesse's score of 7.1 indicates concerns about its future development and feature enhancements.
- Users report that Cypress provides a more thorough testing experience, with features like time travel and automatic waiting, which enhance reliability, while FitNesse's testing thoroughness is perceived as lacking, leading to potential gaps in test coverage.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cypress
OSS - Cypress Test Runner
Free
Always free and open source. No restrictions or limitations.
- http://download.cypress.io/desktop or 'npm install cypress'
FitNesse
No pricing availableFree Trial
Cypress
No trial information availableFitNesse
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
90
8.3
17
Ease of Use
9.3
91
8.1
17
Ease of Setup
9.4
16
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
9.3
14
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.8
72
7.6
13
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
10
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
88
7.1
16
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cypress
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
FitNesse
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
43.1%
Information Technology and Services
20.6%
Financial Services
7.8%
Program Development
2.9%
Marketing and Advertising
2.9%
Other
22.5%
Information Technology and Services
36.0%
Computer Software
16.0%
Banking
12.0%
Financial Services
8.0%
Research
4.0%
Other
24.0%
Most Helpful Reviews
Cypress
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Vaishali J.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Cypress is the best application as it is very fast and easy to use. It provides a very simple and good overview of errors and bugs.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Michael O.
Verified User in Computer Software
Cypress recording does not work on Gitlab Continuous Integration (CI) without customization. Their tech support says you have to configure custom runners with more memory. I had been paying for Cypress for months before I discovered their recording wasn't...
FitNesse
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Will keep it short, Everything about is easy to use and new and fresh.
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Building Materials
FitNesse is rarely used nowadays. Nobody knows about it when I tell about it.
Vaishali J.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Cypress is the best application as it is very fast and easy to use. It provides a very simple and good overview of errors and bugs.
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Will keep it short, Everything about is easy to use and new and fresh.
Michael O.
Verified User in Computer Software
Cypress recording does not work on Gitlab Continuous Integration (CI) without customization. Their tech support says you have to configure custom runners with more memory. I had been paying for Cypress for months before I discovered their recording wasn't...
Verified User in Building Materials
FitNesse is rarely used nowadays. Nobody knows about it when I tell about it.
Discussions
Are their any resources or individuals to help us connect our app authenticating with IdentityServer
1 comment
SR
Interact with the app for identity and then resume. Or use API calls.Read more
How can I influence my lead QA engineer positively to to use Cypress? Cross-browser is a factor.
1 comment
SR
Cypress 4.0 add Firefox and edge browsers.Read more
Is there a plan to add firefox to the list of supported browsers?
1 comment
SR
Firefox and edge are supported in cypress 4.0Read more
FitNesse has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
