Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Cucumber and Tricentis qTest

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Cucumber
Cucumber
Star Rating
(39)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.2% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Cucumber
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Star Rating
(100)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.8% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Tricentis qTest
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • G2 reviewers report that Tricentis qTest excels in test management, with users highlighting its ability to reuse test cases effectively. This feature allows teams to rerun tests easily with each deployment, saving time and enhancing quality.
  • Users say that Cucumber's Gherkin language is particularly beneficial for business collaboration, making it accessible for non-technical stakeholders. This feature improves communication and understanding between product owners and development teams.
  • Reviewers mention that Tricentis qTest offers seamless integration with Jira, providing real-time visibility into test execution and defects. This integration helps align QA and development efforts, which is a significant advantage for teams looking to streamline their workflows.
  • According to verified reviews, Cucumber shines in its data-driven testing support, which users find excellent for enhancing test scenarios. This capability allows teams to create more robust and flexible testing strategies.
  • G2 reviewers highlight that Tricentis qTest is praised for its ease of use and efficient test case management. Users appreciate how easy it is to create and execute test cases, which contributes to a smoother testing process overall.
  • Users report that while Cucumber has a solid foundation for readability and reusability, it faces challenges in ease of setup compared to Tricentis qTest. Some users find the initial configuration to be less intuitive, which can impact the onboarding experience.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cucumber
No pricing available
Tricentis qTest
No pricing available
Free Trial
Cucumber
No trial information available
Tricentis qTest
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
27
8.4
72
Ease of Use
8.1
27
8.4
74
Ease of Setup
8.1
9
8.0
38
Ease of Admin
7.6
7
7.9
20
Quality of Support
8.0
26
8.4
70
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.4
7
8.2
21
Product Direction (% positive)
7.6
24
9.1
80
Features by Category
Not enough data
8.3
30
Functionality
Not enough data
8.6
27
Not enough data
8.0
29
Not enough data
8.5
28
Management
Not enough data
8.3
28
Not enough data
8.2
27
Not enough data
8.1
26
Not enough data
8.9
16
Functionality
Not enough data
9.1
15
Not enough data
9.0
16
Not enough data
8.5
16
Not enough data
9.2
15
Automation
Not enough data
9.1
15
Not enough data
9.0
15
Not enough data
8.8
15
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.5
11
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
7.9
11
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.0
10
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cucumber
Cucumber
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Cucumber and Tricentis qTest are categorized as Software Testing
Unique Categories
Cucumber
Cucumber has no unique categories
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest is categorized as Automation Testing and Test Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cucumber
Cucumber
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
32.4%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
29.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
38.2%
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
27.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
45.8%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
27.1%
Reviewers' Industry
Cucumber
Cucumber
Information Technology and Services
29.4%
Computer Software
17.6%
Retail
8.8%
Food & Beverages
5.9%
Financial Services
5.9%
Other
32.4%
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest
Information Technology and Services
27.1%
Computer Software
22.9%
Financial Services
7.3%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
5.2%
Hospital & Health Care
4.2%
Other
33.3%
Alternatives
Cucumber
Cucumber Alternatives
Postman
Postman
Add Postman
TestRail
TestRail
Add TestRail
Apache JMeter
Apache JMeter
Add Apache JMeter
Cypress
Cypress
Add Cypress
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest Alternatives
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Add BrowserStack
OpenText Application Quality Management
OpenText Application Quality Management
Add OpenText Application Quality Management
Zephyr Enterprise
Zephyr Enterprise
Add Zephyr Enterprise
QMetry Test Management
QMetry Test Management
Add QMetry Test Management
Discussions
Cucumber
Cucumber Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Cucumber has no discussions with answers
Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest Discussions
Does qTest integrate with JIRA?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
qTest integrates with JIRA Cloud and JIRA Server, while also providing qTest Cloud or Server deployment options. See this video here:...Read more
On-Boarding, Training, and continued support is a must have for any tool we adopt. How does QASymphony fit into our success?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
Keeping our customers happy is a top priority, and it shows. We consistently get top satisfaction scores across the board. Check out our customer info...Read more
What is frequency of updates/releases?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
At QASymphony, we are releasing new features and product improvements throughout the year. Right now we are targeting to release between 8 - 10 times a...Read more