Compare CouchDB and RethinkDB 
- Users report that CouchDB excels in its Data Model with a score of 9.3, allowing for flexible document storage, while RethinkDB, although strong, scores lower at 8.6, which may limit some users' data structuring capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that RethinkDB shines in Query Language with a score of 9.1, providing a more intuitive and powerful querying experience compared to CouchDB's score of 7.2, which some users find less user-friendly.
- G2 users highlight CouchDB's superior Data Replication capabilities, scoring 9.0, which is crucial for maintaining data integrity across distributed systems, while RethinkDB's score of 8.6 indicates it may not be as robust in this area.
- Users on G2 report that RethinkDB offers better Scalability with a score of 9.0, making it a preferred choice for applications expecting rapid growth, whereas CouchDB's score of 7.8 suggests it may face challenges under heavy loads.
- Reviewers say that CouchDB's Quality of Support is rated at 7.3, which some users find lacking, while RethinkDB's score of 7.8 indicates a more responsive support experience, enhancing user satisfaction.
- Users report that CouchDB's Disaster Recovery features score 7.8, which some find adequate, but RethinkDB's higher score of 8.3 suggests it may offer more reliable options for data recovery in critical situations.
The best feature of CouchDB is it's simplicity and use of familiar technology and concepts: - A RESTful API means I can use any language to access it (even using shell and curl). - It plays well in the HTTP-based world with things like proxy servers,...
CouchDB is lacking in other features when compared to alternative document databases like MongoDB. No document-based security options, no backend tools or connectors, no builtin support for other platforms. Moreover, there is substantially less...
The query language is amazing compared to other NoSQL query languages. I have only used MongoDB and Redis and compared to MongoDB, the query language is absolutely superb.
RethinkDB is still quite slow for many operations. I know a Swiss start-up that switched from RethinkDB to PostgreSQL because of performance issues. These problems could be fixed in the future but if you need good performance right now at the very least do...
The best feature of CouchDB is it's simplicity and use of familiar technology and concepts: - A RESTful API means I can use any language to access it (even using shell and curl). - It plays well in the HTTP-based world with things like proxy servers,...
The query language is amazing compared to other NoSQL query languages. I have only used MongoDB and Redis and compared to MongoDB, the query language is absolutely superb.
CouchDB is lacking in other features when compared to alternative document databases like MongoDB. No document-based security options, no backend tools or connectors, no builtin support for other platforms. Moreover, there is substantially less...
RethinkDB is still quite slow for many operations. I know a Swiss start-up that switched from RethinkDB to PostgreSQL because of performance issues. These problems could be fixed in the future but if you need good performance right now at the very least do...
