Compare CouchDB and MongoDB 
- Users report that CouchDB excels in its Data Model, scoring a remarkable 9.3, which allows for flexible document storage and easy handling of JSON data. In contrast, MongoDB, while still strong at 8.8, is noted for its more complex data relationships.
- Reviewers mention that CouchDB's Data Replication feature is highly praised, achieving a score of 9.0, which facilitates seamless synchronization across distributed systems. MongoDB's replication, while effective at 8.7, is often seen as less straightforward in setup.
- G2 users highlight CouchDB's Disaster Recovery capabilities, scoring 7.8, which some users find less robust compared to MongoDB's higher score of 8.1, indicating a more reliable backup and recovery process.
- Users on G2 appreciate MongoDB's Query Optimization, which scores 8.6, allowing for faster data retrieval and processing. In contrast, CouchDB's score of 7.2 suggests that users may experience slower query performance in more complex scenarios.
- Reviewers say that CouchDB's Multi-Model support is a standout feature, scoring 9.0, which allows for diverse data handling. MongoDB, while still offering multi-model capabilities at 8.6, is often seen as more focused on document-oriented storage.
- Users report that MongoDB's Quality of Support is significantly better, with a score of 8.5 compared to CouchDB's 7.3, indicating that users find MongoDB's support team more responsive and helpful in resolving issues.
The best feature of CouchDB is it's simplicity and use of familiar technology and concepts: - A RESTful API means I can use any language to access it (even using shell and curl). - It plays well in the HTTP-based world with things like proxy servers,...
CouchDB use your all disk if you do not be careful. You index system could be dangerous and freeze you system.
- Ease of use - Easy to become productive - Easy indexing - Easy to install - Query language - Easy to scale - I was able to implement a polyglot solution combining MongoDB and Neo4j, a graphdb. The architecture has not fundamentally changed since...
Quite a new thing it is for me, so I get stuck with few syntax and semantics and that troubled me. Apart from it so far learning in MongoDB is giving me plaesure.
The best feature of CouchDB is it's simplicity and use of familiar technology and concepts: - A RESTful API means I can use any language to access it (even using shell and curl). - It plays well in the HTTP-based world with things like proxy servers,...
- Ease of use - Easy to become productive - Easy indexing - Easy to install - Query language - Easy to scale - I was able to implement a polyglot solution combining MongoDB and Neo4j, a graphdb. The architecture has not fundamentally changed since...
CouchDB use your all disk if you do not be careful. You index system could be dangerous and freeze you system.
Quite a new thing it is for me, so I get stuck with few syntax and semantics and that troubled me. Apart from it so far learning in MongoDB is giving me plaesure.
