Compare Concrete CMS and WordPress.org 
- Users report that WordPress.org excels in its breadth of pre-built templates, scoring 8.4, which allows for a wide variety of design options. In contrast, Concrete CMS received a lower score of 7.2, indicating fewer pre-built templates available for users.
- Reviewers mention that WordPress.org offers a more robust plugin ecosystem, with a score of 8.6 for plug-ins/widgets/apps, compared to Concrete CMS's score of 6.8. This suggests that WordPress.org provides more flexibility and functionality through third-party integrations.
- G2 users highlight that Concrete CMS shines in its content authoring capabilities, scoring 8.6, while WordPress.org scored slightly higher at 8.9. However, users on G2 appreciate Concrete CMS's versioning feature, which scored 8.5, indicating a strong focus on content management.
- Users say that both platforms have strong SEO capabilities, but Concrete CMS edges out with a score of 8.9 compared to WordPress.org's 8.4. Reviewers mention that this makes Concrete CMS a better choice for users prioritizing search engine optimization.
- Reviewers mention that Concrete CMS has a slight advantage in enterprise scalability, scoring 8.9, while WordPress.org scored 8.2. This suggests that Concrete CMS may be better suited for larger organizations looking for a scalable solution.
- Users report that both platforms have solid user, role, and access management features, with Concrete CMS scoring 8.7 and WordPress.org at 8.6. However, users on G2 note that Concrete CMS provides a more intuitive interface for managing user permissions.
As user: ease of use for designing frontend and backend, graphical editing interface, powerful functionality and lots of features already built in incl. mobile, it's free, it's open source, based on modern technology, attention to security and permissions,...
My least favorite thing is that Concrete 5 isn't as widespread as some other web platforms. So there's fewer widget options and support. I liked how simple it was to implement, as I don't have a ton of web development experience, but when I got stuck, I...
I can't see any reason to use another platform. Every designer, web developer, SEO hand and intern you meet will have used this platform before. You don't need to reinvent the wheel. Use the tools that your potential hires already know how to use!
The free version doesn't allow embedding Java Scripts and other applets which kinds of restricts its scalability. Lot's of spam comments are observed in wordpress blogs, though it distinguishes the spammer's but yet we need to read between each comments to...
As user: ease of use for designing frontend and backend, graphical editing interface, powerful functionality and lots of features already built in incl. mobile, it's free, it's open source, based on modern technology, attention to security and permissions,...
I can't see any reason to use another platform. Every designer, web developer, SEO hand and intern you meet will have used this platform before. You don't need to reinvent the wheel. Use the tools that your potential hires already know how to use!
My least favorite thing is that Concrete 5 isn't as widespread as some other web platforms. So there's fewer widget options and support. I liked how simple it was to implement, as I don't have a ton of web development experience, but when I got stuck, I...
The free version doesn't allow embedding Java Scripts and other applets which kinds of restricts its scalability. Lot's of spam comments are observed in wordpress blogs, though it distinguishes the spammer's but yet we need to read between each comments to...
