- Home
- ...
- C/C++ Integrated Development Environments (IDE)
- Code::Blocks
- RAD Studio
- Code::Blocks-vs-RAD Studio
Compare Code::Blocks and RAD Studio 
- Users report that Code::Blocks has a strong ease of use rating of 8.7, making it accessible for beginners, while RAD Studio shines with a slightly higher rating of 9.0, indicating a more intuitive interface for users who may have prior experience.
- Reviewers mention that Code::Blocks offers solid file management capabilities with a score of 8.6, but RAD Studio's file management is rated slightly lower at 8.3, suggesting that Code::Blocks may provide a more streamlined experience in this area.
- G2 users highlight that Code::Blocks has limited multi-language support with a score of 7.0, whereas RAD Studio excels with a score of 8.1, indicating that RAD Studio is better suited for projects requiring diverse programming languages.
- Users on G2 report that Code::Blocks has a straight-out-the-box functionality score of 7.7, which is significantly lower than RAD Studio's impressive 9.0, suggesting that RAD Studio is more feature-rich and ready to use immediately upon installation.
- Reviewers mention that Code::Blocks has a quality of support rating of 8.0, while RAD Studio outperforms with a score of 8.9, indicating that users may find more reliable assistance and resources when using RAD Studio.
- Users say that Code::Blocks has a patching and updates score of 7.7, which is better than RAD Studio's 6.5, suggesting that Code::Blocks may provide a more consistent update experience, despite RAD Studio's overall higher ratings in other areas.
I like the workability of the coding. It's easy to see where the program faults if there is a fault. Most of the time I'm able to utilize the debug tool when trying to maximize the efficiency of the code.
A lot of issues with compiler, and the layout is very very old fashioned. Not visually appealing like Eclipse or other IDEs. Not good for big python projects or projects in other languages either.
We use Delphi because it is extremely productive. As a language Delphi doesn't have the complexity of C++ or the performance issues of Java.
Unfortunately, there are no public components marketplaces for RAD Studio at the moment, so you need to google the right components for your projects by yourself. Sometimes, the code lint is unstable and tells you that there is an error while there isn't....
I like the workability of the coding. It's easy to see where the program faults if there is a fault. Most of the time I'm able to utilize the debug tool when trying to maximize the efficiency of the code.
We use Delphi because it is extremely productive. As a language Delphi doesn't have the complexity of C++ or the performance issues of Java.
A lot of issues with compiler, and the layout is very very old fashioned. Not visually appealing like Eclipse or other IDEs. Not good for big python projects or projects in other languages either.
Unfortunately, there are no public components marketplaces for RAD Studio at the moment, so you need to google the right components for your projects by yourself. Sometimes, the code lint is unstable and tells you that there is an error while there isn't....
