Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare CODA Footprint and Tenable Vulnerability Management 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Intruder
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (70.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (58.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
CODA Footprint
Star Rating
(11)4.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (70.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CODA FootprintTenable Vulnerability Management
Star Rating
(121)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (58.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Tenable Vulnerability ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Tenable Vulnerability Management excels in its Automated Scans feature, scoring 9.2, which allows for efficient vulnerability detection across large networks. In contrast, CODA Footprint also offers strong scanning capabilities but scores slightly lower at 9.1, indicating a marginal difference in performance.
- Reviewers mention that CODA Footprint shines in Quality of Support, achieving a remarkable score of 9.8, which is significantly higher than Tenable's score of 7.9. This suggests that users find CODA Footprint's customer service to be more responsive and helpful.
- G2 users highlight the Vulnerability Intelligence feature in Tenable, which received a high score of 9.6, indicating robust capabilities in identifying and prioritizing vulnerabilities. CODA Footprint also performs well in this area with a score of 9.3, but Tenable's offering is perceived as more comprehensive.
- Users on G2 report that Tenable's False Positives score of 7.1 is a concern, as it indicates a higher rate of inaccurate alerts compared to CODA Footprint, which does not have a specified score but is generally perceived to have fewer false alerts based on user feedback.
- Reviewers say that CODA Footprint's Ease of Setup is a standout feature, scoring 9.5, which suggests that new users can get started quickly and with minimal hassle. Tenable, while still user-friendly, scores lower at 8.7, indicating a potentially steeper learning curve.
- Users report that Tenable's Continuous Monitoring feature, scoring 9.6, is highly effective for ongoing security assessments, while CODA Footprint, although strong, scores slightly lower at 9.0, suggesting that Tenable may provide a more robust solution for organizations needing constant vigilance.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
CODA Footprint
No pricing availableTenable Vulnerability Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
CODA Footprint
No trial information availableTenable Vulnerability Management
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.2
10
8.9
82
Ease of Use
9.3
10
8.9
84
Ease of Setup
9.5
7
8.8
68
Ease of Admin
9.0
7
8.7
66
Quality of Support
9.8
10
8.1
80
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.8
7
8.6
66
Product Direction (% positive)
8.8
10
8.9
85
Features by Category
Performance
Not enough data
8.4
46
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
48
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.1
48
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.3
48
|
Verified
Network
Not enough data
8.5
44
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
43
Not enough data
8.7
40
|
Verified
Application
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.5
33
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Risk Analysis
8.7
9
8.9
58
9.1
9
8.1
59
9.1
9
8.8
58
Vulnerability Assesment
9.1
9
9.4
59
9.3
9
9.2
57
9.1
9
8.7
54
9.3
9
8.2
57
Automation
8.3
9
7.7
49
8.9
9
7.8
47
9.4
9
8.1
51
9.3
9
8.1
52
ServiceNow Apps
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.3
7
Agentic AI - ServiceNow Store Apps
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Asset Management
8.8
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.5
8
Not enough data
9.6
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.6
8
Not enough data
Risk Management
9.6
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
9.8
8
Not enough data
9.4
8
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
CODA Footprint and Tenable Vulnerability Management are categorized as Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
Unique Categories
CODA Footprint is categorized as Attack Surface Management
Tenable Vulnerability Management is categorized as Vulnerability Scanner and ServiceNow Store Apps
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
CODA Footprint
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tenable Vulnerability Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer & Network Security
50.0%
Information Technology and Services
40.0%
Banking
10.0%
‐
‐
Other
0.0%
Information Technology and Services
13.5%
Financial Services
13.5%
Computer & Network Security
9.0%
Banking
6.3%
Computer Software
5.4%
Other
52.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
CODA Footprint has no discussions with answers
Please advice on best practices for utilizing API to tie to visualization dashboards such as Power BI, Qlick, or Tableau
1 Comment
G2
TableRead more
What is tenable io?
1 Comment
CK
Tenable.io is user-friendly front end for Nessus scanners that provides a digestible view of all of the data the scanner is picking up. It allows you to...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
