Compare CocoaPods and Yarn 
- Users report that Yarn excels in its speed and efficiency, particularly with its caching feature, which allows for faster installations compared to CocoaPods, where reviewers mention longer installation times due to dependency resolution.
- Reviewers mention that Yarn's workspaces feature is a standout, enabling better management of monorepos, while users on G2 express frustration with CocoaPods' handling of multiple targets in a single project.
- G2 users highlight Yarn's superior quality of support, scoring 9.2, which contrasts sharply with CocoaPods' lower score of 7.2, indicating that users find Yarn's community and documentation more helpful.
- Users say that Yarn's user interface is more intuitive and easier to navigate, leading to a higher ease of use rating of 9.0, while CocoaPods received a slightly lower rating of 8.7, suggesting some users find it less user-friendly.
- Reviewers mention that Yarn's product direction is viewed positively by 8.1% of users, indicating a strong roadmap and community engagement, whereas CocoaPods' product direction is less favorable at 5.2%, leading to concerns about its future development.
- Users report that Yarn's ability to handle package versions and dependencies is more robust, with features like selective version resolutions, while CocoaPods users express challenges with version conflicts and dependency management.
Implementation of the CocoaPods is straight-forward, and my personal opinion: CocoaPods is way better then Carthage and other dependency managers.
- My git changes will be +1000 files - I am forced to work with workspace not just staying with xcodeproj - I can't know if a pod is working or not till I download it and build the project, why not having like CI to build the pod on the server and tell us...
I guess it's the ease of use, great for mono repos, and easy to install. I also think that the icons are beautiful when installing packages. My whole experience with yarn has been great. To mention other things about yarn, I must say that it installs...
Documentation is not sufficient for absolute newcomers
Implementation of the CocoaPods is straight-forward, and my personal opinion: CocoaPods is way better then Carthage and other dependency managers.
I guess it's the ease of use, great for mono repos, and easy to install. I also think that the icons are beautiful when installing packages. My whole experience with yarn has been great. To mention other things about yarn, I must say that it installs...
- My git changes will be +1000 files - I am forced to work with workspace not just staying with xcodeproj - I can't know if a pod is working or not till I download it and build the project, why not having like CI to build the pod on the server and tell us...
Documentation is not sufficient for absolute newcomers
