- Home
- ...
- Secure Code Training Software
- Checkmarx Codebashing
- Secure Code Warrior
- Checkmarx Codebashing-vs-Secure Code Warrior
Compare Checkmarx Codebashing and Secure Code Warrior 
- Users report that Secure Code Warrior excels in its "Interactive Training" feature, scoring a remarkable 9.7, which reviewers mention significantly enhances the learning experience through hands-on practice.
- Reviewers mention that Checkmarx Codebashing shines in "Reporting" with a score of 8.6, providing detailed insights that help teams understand their security posture better, while Secure Code Warrior's reporting scored lower at 7.8.
- G2 users highlight Secure Code Warrior's "Customization" capabilities, scoring 8.8, allowing organizations to tailor the training content to their specific needs, whereas Checkmarx Codebashing's customization scored lower at 7.3.
- Users on G2 report that Secure Code Warrior's "Content Library" is robust, with a score of 9.0, offering a wide range of resources, while Checkmarx Codebashing's library received a lower score of 7.5, indicating less variety.
- Reviewers mention that both products perform well in "Continuous Assessment," with Secure Code Warrior scoring 8.6 and Checkmarx Codebashing at 8.5, but users say Secure Code Warrior's assessments feel more integrated into the learning process.
- Users say that while both platforms offer "Gamification," Secure Code Warrior's score of 8.5 indicates a more engaging experience compared to Checkmarx Codebashing's score of 7.9, making it a preferred choice for teams looking to motivate developers.
The overall experience of the coding journey which feels so intuitive and game play alike and task based is really fun to learn. Overall UI/UX and lots of training problems on almost all the major coding languages makes this platform must to try for coding...
Tool is getting old. Colors used for developers are not clear. Exercises take too much time.
The gamification aspect, across a lot of computer languages, some vendors only offer it in one language/platform. During a tournament, developers/programmers can also compete with others.
The assessment code was unintelligible at best. No comments, no context as to what a function or class is supposed to be doing. Constrained to a terrible online IDE with no quality-of-life functionality that would be used to review code (e.g. no...
The overall experience of the coding journey which feels so intuitive and game play alike and task based is really fun to learn. Overall UI/UX and lots of training problems on almost all the major coding languages makes this platform must to try for coding...
The gamification aspect, across a lot of computer languages, some vendors only offer it in one language/platform. During a tournament, developers/programmers can also compete with others.
Tool is getting old. Colors used for developers are not clear. Exercises take too much time.
The assessment code was unintelligible at best. No comments, no context as to what a function or class is supposed to be doing. Constrained to a terrible online IDE with no quality-of-life functionality that would be used to review code (e.g. no...
