Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare CATIA and Designcenter Solid Edge

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
CATIA
CATIA
Star Rating
(249)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (49.6% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CATIA
Designcenter Solid Edge
Designcenter Solid Edge
Star Rating
(558)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (54.1% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $90.47 Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plans
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • G2 reviewers report that Designcenter Solid Edge excels in user-friendliness, making it particularly suitable for beginners. Users appreciate its straightforward interface and intuitive design, which allows newcomers to quickly pick up the software and start working effectively.
  • Users say that Designcenter Solid Edge significantly enhances workflow efficiency by integrating part reuse seamlessly. The ability to quickly find and drop standard parts without interrupting the design process is a standout feature that saves time on repetitive projects.
  • Reviewers mention that while CATIA offers impressive graphics and a robust feature set, it comes with a steeper learning curve compared to Designcenter Solid Edge. This can be a barrier for new users who may find the initial setup and understanding of features more challenging.
  • According to verified reviews, Designcenter Solid Edge has a higher overall satisfaction score, reflecting its strong performance in areas like ease of use and support quality. Users highlight the responsive support team, which contributes to a positive experience when troubleshooting or seeking guidance.
  • Users note that CATIA, while powerful, may struggle with file compatibility issues, which can hinder workflow efficiency. Some reviewers have encountered difficulties when working with neutral formats, indicating that this could be a concern for teams that rely on diverse file types.
  • G2 reviewers highlight that Designcenter Solid Edge is particularly favored by small businesses, with a significant portion of its user base coming from this segment. This focus on smaller enterprises may contribute to its tailored features that meet the specific needs of these users, unlike CATIA, which is more geared towards larger enterprises.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
CATIA
No pricing available
Designcenter Solid Edge
Solid Edge Design and Drafting XaaS
Starting at $90.47
Per Month
Browse all 4 pricing plans
Free Trial
CATIA
No trial information available
Designcenter Solid Edge
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
213
8.4
408
Ease of Use
7.3
216
8.3
447
Ease of Setup
8.0
19
8.2
232
Ease of Admin
7.7
11
8.4
87
Quality of Support
7.7
189
8.2
379
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.8
13
8.8
86
Product Direction (% positive)
8.1
212
8.3
396
Features by Category
Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM)Hide 9 FeaturesShow 9 Features
Not enough data
8.2
114
CAD to CAM
Not enough data
8.6
99
Not enough data
8.4
93
Not enough data
8.4
94
CNC Programming
Not enough data
7.9
84
Not enough data
8.0
82
Not enough data
8.1
81
Machining
Not enough data
8.2
92
Not enough data
8.1
92
Not enough data
8.4
91
Not enough data
8.5
180
Design
Not enough data
8.9
173
Not enough data
9.0
175
Not enough data
8.7
171
Not enough data
8.2
166
Edit
Not enough data
8.5
169
Not enough data
8.3
161
Not enough data
8.5
169
Not enough data
8.4
162
Collaboration
Not enough data
8.5
165
Not enough data
8.6
167
Not enough data
8.2
165
Additive ManufacturingHide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
Not enough data
7.8
95
File Support - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
8.7
84
Not enough data
8.2
66
Not enough data
8.2
74
File Editing - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
7.7
74
Not enough data
8.5
78
Software Integrations - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
7.6
64
Not enough data
8.6
81
Software Type - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.4
72
Generative AI - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
6.0
26
Not enough data
6.0
26
Building Preparation - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
8.0
100
Design
Not enough data
8.6
95
Not enough data
8.6
96
Not enough data
8.5
94
Not enough data
7.9
94
Tools
Not enough data
7.6
80
Not enough data
8.0
86
Not enough data
7.7
82
Work
Not enough data
7.8
83
Not enough data
7.7
83
Not enough data
7.8
83
Not enough data
7.7
77
Not enough data
8.0
82
Environment
Not enough data
8.1
89
Not enough data
8.0
90
Not enough data
7.9
85
Not enough data
8.5
91
Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)Hide 18 FeaturesShow 18 Features
Not enough data
7.8
103
Tools - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.5
95
Not enough data
7.6
90
Not enough data
8.4
91
Not enough data
8.2
90
Not enough data
7.4
88
File Options - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.0
91
Not enough data
8.2
91
Not enough data
7.7
88
Not enough data
7.3
88
Not enough data
7.4
91
Customization - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
7.8
88
Not enough data
7.4
86
Not enough data
7.6
88
Not enough data
7.5
91
Environment - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
7.7
91
Not enough data
7.9
88
Not enough data
7.6
88
Not enough data
8.0
89
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
CATIA
CATIA
Designcenter Solid Edge
Designcenter Solid Edge
CATIA and Designcenter Solid Edge are categorized as Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD) and Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
CATIA
CATIA has no unique categories
Designcenter Solid Edge
Designcenter Solid Edge is categorized as Additive Manufacturing, Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM), and General-Purpose CAD
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
CATIA
CATIA
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
21.4%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
29.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
49.6%
Designcenter Solid Edge
Designcenter Solid Edge
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
54.1%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
30.1%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
15.9%
Reviewers' Industry
CATIA
CATIA
Automotive
25.6%
Aviation & Aerospace
21.8%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
14.1%
Design
9.4%
Airlines/Aviation
5.1%
Other
23.9%
Designcenter Solid Edge
Designcenter Solid Edge
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
21.2%
Automotive
12.5%
Design
8.9%
Machinery
6.0%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
4.0%
Other
47.4%
Alternatives
CATIA
CATIA Alternatives
Onshape
Onshape
Add Onshape
SOLIDWORKS
SOLIDWORKS
Add SOLIDWORKS
Autodesk Fusion
Autodesk Fusion
Add Autodesk Fusion
Inventor
Inventor
Add Inventor
Designcenter Solid Edge
Designcenter Solid Edge Alternatives
SOLIDWORKS
SOLIDWORKS
Add SOLIDWORKS
Autodesk Fusion
Autodesk Fusion
Add Autodesk Fusion
Onshape
Onshape
Add Onshape
Creo
Creo
Add Creo
Discussions
CATIA
CATIA Discussions
If CATIA provide solution for fluid dynamics problem it will be good
1 Comment
Venkatesh G.
VG
Catia has computational fluid dynamic (CFD) You have to add in floEFD into your catia. It can be added from version 5 or above. Similarly you can also...Read more
What is Catia software used for?
1 Comment
Abhinav R.
AR
CATIA software is commonly used for: 1. Plastic and Metal parts design. 2. Wire harness design. 3. Drafting and Drawing 4. Mould and Die design. 5....Read more
What is inside Catia software?
1 Comment
Giorgio A.
GA
CAD 3D models from product industry and engineeringRead more
Designcenter Solid Edge
Designcenter Solid Edge Discussions
Is Solidworks or Solid Edge better?
4 Comments
HJ
Solidworks is far better in terms of productivity and user friendly mostly for repetitive models or library parts. Read more
How can solid edge be improved? Making it available for the higher version of the OS.
2 Comments
EK
Hello Mahalakshmi, The most recent version, Solid Edge 2021, has been certified to run on the Windows 10 Enterprise or Professional (64-bit only) version...Read more
What is Solid Edge used for?
2 Comments
CADER J.
CJ
It is used for 3D modeling as well as drafting.Read more