Compare Cacti and SmokePing 
- Users report that Cacti excels in multi-network capability with a score of 9.2, allowing for comprehensive monitoring across various networks, while SmokePing, although effective, does not match this level of versatility.
- Reviewers mention that Cacti's performance monitoring feature is highly rated at 8.9, providing detailed insights into network performance, whereas SmokePing's alerting system, rated at 7.9, is seen as less robust in terms of immediate notifications.
- G2 users highlight that Cacti offers superior data visualization tools, scoring 8.6, which help in presenting complex data in an understandable format, while SmokePing's visualization capabilities are considered more basic and less user-friendly.
- Users on G2 indicate that Cacti's performance baseline feature is rated at 8.9, allowing users to establish and track performance metrics effectively, whereas SmokePing's path analysis, rated at 8.3, is noted to be less comprehensive in its analysis capabilities.
- Reviewers say that Cacti has a higher overall ease of use score of 7.6 compared to SmokePing's 8.4, suggesting that while SmokePing is easier to navigate, Cacti provides a more feature-rich experience that may require a steeper learning curve.
- Users report that the quality of support for Cacti, rated at 7.1, is perceived as lacking compared to SmokePing's 8.2, indicating that users may find more responsive and helpful support when using SmokePing.
We monitor all kinds of metrics about our network switches and routers and keep the stats in Cacti. It helps us find trends and problems quickly.
it was a pain in the butt to set up. I spent days trying to find out what template to use, and how to set it up.
The GPL smokeping provide latency data collection, RRDtool storage, and graphical presentation of that data. The cost and flexibility are unsurpassed. The code is well maintained, and requires a very reasonable amount of resources (RAM, CPU) to run. The...
UI needs an improvise. Begineers get confused in their first view.
We monitor all kinds of metrics about our network switches and routers and keep the stats in Cacti. It helps us find trends and problems quickly.
The GPL smokeping provide latency data collection, RRDtool storage, and graphical presentation of that data. The cost and flexibility are unsurpassed. The code is well maintained, and requires a very reasonable amount of resources (RAM, CPU) to run. The...
it was a pain in the butt to set up. I spent days trying to find out what template to use, and how to set it up.
UI needs an improvise. Begineers get confused in their first view.
