- Home
- ...
- Component Libraries Software
- Bunifu Framework
- Progress Telerik
- Bunifu Framework-vs-Progress Telerik
Compare Bunifu Framework and Progress Telerik 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (70.6% of reviews)
Small-Business (47.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$349.00 2 Users Per Year
Starting at $849.00 Per Year
Bunifu Framework
Star Rating
(17)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (70.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$349.00 2 Users Per Year
Browse all 4 pricing plansProgress Telerik
Star Rating
(96)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.1% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $849.00 Per Year
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Progress Telerik excels in its Component Library, scoring 9.2, which reviewers mention provides a wide range of pre-built components that enhance development speed and efficiency. In contrast, Bunifu Framework's Component Library scored 8.7, indicating a solid offering but with fewer options.
- Reviewers mention that Progress Telerik's Ease of Setup is rated at 8.6, which users say allows for a smoother initial experience compared to Bunifu Framework's lower score of 6.3, where users report challenges in getting started.
- G2 users highlight that Progress Telerik has a strong Quality of Support rating of 8.7, with many reviewers saying that the support team is responsive and helpful. Conversely, Bunifu Framework received a higher score of 9.2, with users on G2 praising its exceptional customer service and quick resolution times.
- Users say that Progress Telerik shines in its UI Code Extending capabilities, scoring 8.8, which allows for significant customization. However, reviewers mention that Bunifu Framework also offers good customization options but falls slightly behind with a score of 8.6.
- Reviewers mention that Progress Telerik's Product Direction is rated at 8.1, indicating some concerns about future updates and features. In contrast, Bunifu Framework received a more favorable score of 9.2, with users reporting confidence in the product's ongoing development and enhancements.
- Users report that while both products offer multi-language support, Progress Telerik scored 7.4, which some users found limiting. In comparison, Bunifu Framework's score of 7.4 also reflects similar limitations, but users on G2 mention that its implementation feels more intuitive and user-friendly.
Featured Products
Sponsored
Intellimas
(0)
Low-Code Development Platforms
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Bunifu Framework
Bunifu Framework Ultimate
$349.00
2 Users Per Year
Access modern and easy to use WinForms and Data visualization controls for less
- Access 60+ controls and components
- Access to quick premium support
- Receive all product updates and upgrades
Progress Telerik
Individual .NET Libraries
Starting at $849.00
Per Year
Telerik UI for Blazor, Telerik UI for ASP.NET MVC, Telerik UI for ASP.NET Core, Telerik UI for .NET MAUI, Telerik UI for ASP.NET MVC, Telerik UI for ASP.NET Core, Telerik UI for WPF, Telerik UI for WinForms.
- Truly native UI components to cover any app scenario
- Telerik UI Kits for Figma
- Document processing libraries
Free Trial
Bunifu Framework
Free Trial is available
Progress Telerik
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
15
8.8
58
Ease of Use
9.1
15
8.2
60
Ease of Setup
6.3
5
8.6
30
Ease of Admin
9.7
5
8.9
22
Quality of Support
9.2
14
8.7
58
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.9
25
Product Direction (% positive)
9.2
15
8.1
56
Features by Category
Functionality
8.3
8
8.7
19
8.7
9
9.2
22
8.8
8
8.6
18
Management
8.3
8
8.7
21
8.6
7
7.9
17
9.0
8
8.6
22
Data Sources
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Delivery
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
7.5
20
Not enough data
7.7
16
Not enough data
7.4
18
Not enough data
7.3
20
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
7.3
20
Not enough data
8.0
19
Application Design
Not enough data
8.8
12
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
11
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
10
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
12
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
10
|
Verified
Data Control
Not enough data
7.7
10
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.2
10
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
9
|
Verified
Publishing
Not enough data
8.3
10
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
11
Not enough data
8.0
11
|
Verified
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Bunifu Framework and Progress Telerik are categorized as Component Libraries
Unique Categories
Bunifu Framework has no unique categories
Progress Telerik is categorized as Application Development Platforms, Low-Code Development Platforms, and Document Generation
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Bunifu Framework
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Progress Telerik
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
41.2%
Consulting
11.8%
Information Technology and Services
11.8%
Farming
11.8%
Program Development
5.9%
Other
17.6%
Computer Software
19.8%
Information Technology and Services
16.3%
Insurance
4.7%
Financial Services
4.7%
Automotive
4.7%
Other
50.0%
Most Helpful Reviews
Bunifu Framework
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Qaser A.
Verified User in Computer Software
Easy to connect, and of course makes our apps look alive
Most Helpful Critical Review
Progress Telerik
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Sameer N.
Verified User in Insurance
This library is truly impressive with all its rich features. This comes with a variety of Controls which makes UI design so easier and effective. This enhance the look and feel of the application, led to high Customer satisfaction. I would also like to...
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Computer Software
Telerik chart components on iOS behave differently than Android. Bugs that my team identifies and produces code to reproduce are not fixed quickly. MS AppCenter "Stable" toolchain versions are not supported when newer versions of Telerik are released
Qaser A.
Verified User in Computer Software
Easy to connect, and of course makes our apps look alive
Sameer N.
Verified User in Insurance
This library is truly impressive with all its rich features. This comes with a variety of Controls which makes UI design so easier and effective. This enhance the look and feel of the application, led to high Customer satisfaction. I would also like to...
Verified User in Computer Software
Telerik chart components on iOS behave differently than Android. Bugs that my team identifies and produces code to reproduce are not fixed quickly. MS AppCenter "Stable" toolchain versions are not supported when newer versions of Telerik are released
Alternatives
Discussions
Bunifu Framework has no discussions with answers
What is Telerik UI?
2 comments
RS
Telerik UI helps in building application faster with less code, UI components are readily available to use for example Telerik Grid which comes with paging,...Read more
What is Telerik UI for asp net?
1 comment
JL
My experience with Telerik has been with Winforms, Windows UI and MVC. For asp.net, I imagine that, like the foregoing platforms, Telerik provides UI...Read more
What is Progress Telerik used for?
1 comment
JL
Telerik is used for enhancing the appearance and functionality of applications through enhanced efficiency of software development using proprietary...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
