Compare Beanstalk and GitHub 
- Users report that GitHub excels in its Integration capabilities, scoring 9.1, which allows seamless connections with various tools and services, enhancing workflow efficiency. In contrast, Beanstalk, while still strong with a score of 9.2, is noted for its Extensibility, which some users feel is slightly less intuitive.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Deployment-Ready Staging feature, rated at 9.0, provides a robust environment for testing before production, which many find essential for maintaining code quality. Beanstalk's similar feature is rated slightly lower, at 8.9, leading some users to feel it lacks the same level of confidence during deployment.
- G2 users highlight GitHub's Task Management functionality, scoring 8.9, as a strong point, allowing teams to effectively track and manage their work. Beanstalk, with a score of 8.8, offers similar capabilities but users report that GitHub's interface is more user-friendly and visually appealing.
- Users on G2 report that GitHub's Quality of Support is rated at 8.7, with many praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. Beanstalk, however, has a slightly higher score of 8.8, with reviewers mentioning that they appreciate the personalized support experience.
- Reviewers say that GitHub's Access Control features, rated at 9.0, provide a comprehensive way to manage permissions and security, which is crucial for collaborative projects. Beanstalk also scores well in this area with a 9.1, but some users feel GitHub's implementation is more straightforward.
- Users report that GitHub's Documentation is highly regarded, with a score of 8.7, making it easier for new users to onboard and find necessary information. Beanstalk's documentation, while rated at 8.8, is sometimes described as less comprehensive, leading to a steeper learning curve for new users.
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
The UI is a breeze to use and the simplicity of the system is first in its class. For anyone managing deployments to their client's websites, whether it's on a regular basis, or not, to a staging server or a production server, Beanstalk makes it easy to do...
You have to dig a little deep sometimes to get to where you need to be. (errors, settings, etc...) I don't like that I have to have a different login for different teams either.
Free access to open source repos. Free, easy collaboration with developers in amateur settings. Powerful, inexpensive collaboration in professional settings. The Octo-Kitty is pretty great. We integrate with Slack, Jira, and Heroku. At this point pretty...
Custom support is terrible. They are very slow to reply, even if you are in a crisis. I'm at BRT and they put me someone at Sydney to help me, for god sake. It takes a day for someone to read what you sent. Adding users when you're an enterprise client is...
The UI is a breeze to use and the simplicity of the system is first in its class. For anyone managing deployments to their client's websites, whether it's on a regular basis, or not, to a staging server or a production server, Beanstalk makes it easy to do...
Free access to open source repos. Free, easy collaboration with developers in amateur settings. Powerful, inexpensive collaboration in professional settings. The Octo-Kitty is pretty great. We integrate with Slack, Jira, and Heroku. At this point pretty...
You have to dig a little deep sometimes to get to where you need to be. (errors, settings, etc...) I don't like that I have to have a different login for different teams either.
Custom support is terrible. They are very slow to reply, even if you are in a crisis. I'm at BRT and they put me someone at Sydney to help me, for god sake. It takes a day for someone to read what you sent. Adding users when you're an enterprise client is...
