Compare Bamboo and TeamCity 
- Users report that Bamboo excels in its integration capabilities, scoring a remarkable 9.7, which reviewers mention allows seamless connections with various tools, enhancing the overall workflow.
- Reviewers say that TeamCity shines in deployment-ready staging, achieving a score of 9.1, which users appreciate for its ability to streamline the deployment process and reduce downtime.
- G2 users highlight Bamboo's extensibility with a score of 9.0, noting that its customizable features allow teams to tailor the software to their specific needs, making it a flexible choice for diverse projects.
- Users on G2 mention that TeamCity's automation features, rated at 8.7, are particularly robust, enabling teams to automate repetitive tasks effectively, which enhances productivity and reduces manual errors.
- Reviewers mention that while both products have similar ease of use ratings, Bamboo's user interface is often described as more intuitive, making it easier for new users to adapt quickly.
- Users say that TeamCity's reporting capabilities, with a score of 8.0, provide detailed insights that help teams track their progress and identify areas for improvement, which is a crucial aspect for project management.
- Up to 10 jobs, Unlimited local agents, No remote agents
- Unlimited web users
- Unlimited concurrency
- Fleet of Linux, Windows and macOS build agents maintained by JetBrains
It's easy to use for easy things. Fortunately most of what I do is easy. It's harder to do harder things but in most cases it is possible to work within the constraints of the system. The documentation is pretty good once you figure out where it is. ...
The setup is altogether a bit difficult. the setting links are sometimes misleading. The links should be clear enough to understand.
TeamCity makes it extraordinarily easy to configure individual builds. By far the best feature is its ability to use parameters for builds, which makes it very easy to create generic build configurations that can be used over and over again.
Documentation sucks, and is very difficult to set up and upgrade
It's easy to use for easy things. Fortunately most of what I do is easy. It's harder to do harder things but in most cases it is possible to work within the constraints of the system. The documentation is pretty good once you figure out where it is. ...
TeamCity makes it extraordinarily easy to configure individual builds. By far the best feature is its ability to use parameters for builds, which makes it very easy to create generic build configurations that can be used over and over again.
The setup is altogether a bit difficult. the setting links are sometimes misleading. The links should be clear enough to understand.
Documentation sucks, and is very difficult to set up and upgrade
