G2 reviewers report that Lyssna excels in providing a quick and efficient user experience, with users highlighting its super fast feedback and easy setup for running tests. This makes it particularly appealing for those needing to gather insights rapidly.
Users say that Ballpark offers a highly intuitive interface, allowing them to build surveys in as little as 20 minutes. This ease of use is a significant advantage for teams looking to implement user research without a steep learning curve.
Reviewers mention that while Lyssna has a strong focus on flexibility with various research formats, it also benefits from excellent customer support, which users appreciate when navigating its features.
According to verified reviews, Ballpark stands out for its unique features tailored for Figma testing, making it a versatile choice for design teams. However, some users note that its overall output may not be as advanced as competitors.
G2 reviewers highlight that both platforms offer free entry-level pricing, making them accessible for small businesses and mid-market companies alike. However, Lyssna has a larger share of reviews from small businesses, indicating a strong fit for that segment.
Users report that while both tools provide solid survey capabilities, Ballpark slightly edges out in areas like survey distribution and branching logic, which are crucial for creating more complex surveys that cater to diverse respondent needs.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.