Compare Azure Cost Management and Billing and IBM Turbonomic

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Azure Cost Management and Billing
Azure Cost Management and Billing
Star Rating
(12)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Cost Management and Billing
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Star Rating
(247)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (46.9% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
Free Trial
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plans
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that IBM Turbonomic excels in Cloud Optimization with a score of 8.8, highlighting its ability to automatically optimize resources based on real-time demand, while Azure Cost Management and Billing, with a score of 8.7, is noted for its effective Spend Forecasting and Optimization features, allowing users to predict and manage costs effectively.
  • Reviewers mention that IBM Turbonomic's Quality of Support is rated at 8.9, indicating a strong customer service experience, whereas Azure Cost Management and Billing falls short with a score of 7.5, suggesting that users may face challenges in getting timely assistance.
  • G2 users highlight that IBM Turbonomic offers superior Multi-Cloud Management capabilities with a score of 9.2, allowing seamless management across various cloud platforms, while Azure's score of 8.6 indicates it may not be as robust in this area.
  • Users on G2 report that IBM Turbonomic's Real-Time Monitoring for cloud infrastructure is rated at 9.0, providing immediate insights into performance, while Azure Cost Management and Billing's monitoring features are less comprehensive, leading to potential delays in identifying issues.
  • Reviewers say that IBM Turbonomic shines in Systems Monitoring with a score of 9.0, offering extensive visibility into system performance, whereas Azure's capabilities in this area are rated lower, which may limit users' ability to monitor their systems effectively.
  • Users say that IBM Turbonomic's Automation features, rated at 8.7, allow for efficient resource management and task automation, while Azure Cost Management and Billing's automation capabilities, rated at 8.5, may not provide the same level of efficiency, leading to more manual processes.
Featured Products
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Cost Management and Billing
No pricing available
IBM Turbonomic
Free Trial
Free Trial
Browse all 4 pricing plans
Free Trial
Azure Cost Management and Billing
No trial information available
IBM Turbonomic
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
9
8.7
183
Ease of Use
7.2
9
8.4
187
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.4
143
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.5
130
Quality of Support
7.5
8
8.9
159
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
9.0
128
Product Direction (% positive)
7.4
9
8.5
176
Features by Category
Not enough data
8.6
911
Operations
Not enough data
8.8
102
Not enough data
8.8
96
Not enough data
8.5
76
Not enough data
8.6
94
Cost Optimization
Not enough data
8.7
96
Not enough data
8.6
94
Not enough data
8.5
87
Administration
Not enough data
8.2
91
Not enough data
8.5
99
Not enough data
8.6
76
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Infrastructure MonitoringHide 10 FeaturesShow 10 Features
Not enough data
8.5
195
Monitoring
Not enough data
8.8
21
Not enough data
8.5
18
Not enough data
8.1
16
Not enough data
9.0
19
Administration
Not enough data
8.6
21
Not enough data
9.0
17
Not enough data
8.5
20
Analysis
Not enough data
7.9
21
Not enough data
8.0
21
Not enough data
8.7
21
Cloud Management PlatformsHide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
Not enough data
8.5
94
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
19
Not enough data
8.4
18
Not enough data
8.6
19
Management
Not enough data
8.5
18
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.7
20
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.6
54
Functionality
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Issue Resolution
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Management
Not enough data
8.1
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Generative AI
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Enterprise MonitoringHide 8 FeaturesShow 8 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Center Infrastructure Management (DCIM)Hide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
Not enough data
8.7
25
Performance Management
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Monitoring
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.6
40
Alerts management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.3
5
Monitoring
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
6.3
5
Issue Resolution
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Enterprise IT ManagementHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
8.1
64
Analysis
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Platform
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.0
14
Not enough data
7.9
14
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Security
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.4
18
Not enough data
8.0
18
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Cost Management and Billing
Azure Cost Management and Billing
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Azure Cost Management and Billing and IBM Turbonomic are categorized as Cloud Cost Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Cost Management and Billing
Azure Cost Management and Billing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
50.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
33.3%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
16.7%
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
21.7%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
31.4%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
46.9%
Reviewers' Industry
Azure Cost Management and Billing
Azure Cost Management and Billing
Information Technology and Services
16.7%
Pharmaceuticals
8.3%
Non-Profit Organization Management
8.3%
Marketing and Advertising
8.3%
Insurance
8.3%
Other
50.0%
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Information Technology and Services
17.3%
Computer Software
13.7%
Telecommunications
6.2%
Financial Services
5.3%
Retail
3.5%
Other
54.0%
Most Helpful Reviews
Azure Cost Management and Billing
Azure Cost Management and Billing
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Pharmaceuticals
GP
Verified User in Pharmaceuticals

I like the fact that azure cost management is so user friendly.

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Financial Services
GF
Verified User in Financial Services

I’ve found the tool to be useful for cost management

IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Richard R.
RR
Richard R.
Verified User in Human Resources

The lack of late night outage calls now that all of our systems resources are better allocated.

Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User
G
Verified User in Telecommunications

UI annoyances sometimes, Few functional issues

Alternatives
Azure Cost Management and Billing
Azure Cost Management and Billing Alternatives
AWS Cost Explorer
AWS Cost Explorer
Add AWS Cost Explorer
IBM Cloudability
IBM Cloudability
Add IBM Cloudability
Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
Add Amazon CloudWatch
Flexera One
Flexera One
Add Flexera One
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic Alternatives
Dynatrace
Dynatrace
Add Dynatrace
Datadog
Datadog
Add Datadog
AppDynamics
AppDynamics
Add AppDynamics
Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
Add Amazon CloudWatch
Discussions
Azure Cost Management and Billing
Azure Cost Management and Billing Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Azure Cost Management and Billing has no discussions with answers
IBM Turbonomic
IBM Turbonomic Discussions
What is ParkMyCloud and how does it work?
1 comment
Official Response from ParkMyCloud
ParkMyCloud is a SaaS platform that automatically identifies and eliminates public cloud resource waste, reducing spending by 65% or more — think “Nest for...Read more
Why do I need ParkMyCloud — what problem does it solve?
1 comment
Official Response from ParkMyCloud
The popularity of cloud service providers like Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform (GCP), and Alibaba Cloud has exploded...Read more
Which cloud service providers do you support?
1 comment
Official Response from ParkMyCloud
ParkMyCloud supports Amazon Web Services (AWS) including AWS GovCloud (US), Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform (GCP), and Alibaba Cloud.Read more