- Home
- ...
- Container Registry Software
- Azure Container Registry
- Docker hub
- Azure Container Registry-vs-Docker hub
Compare Azure Container Registry and Docker 
- Users report that Docker excels in deployment flexibility, with a rating of 9.3, allowing for seamless integration across various environments, while Azure Container Registry, although robust, does not match this level of deployment versatility.
- Reviewers mention that Docker's interface support is rated at 8.5, which some users find less intuitive compared to Azure Container Registry's higher rating of 9.0, indicating a more user-friendly experience for managing container images.
- G2 users highlight Docker's orchestration capabilities with a score of 8.5, but reviewers note that Azure Container Registry offers superior orchestration features, making it a better choice for users needing advanced container management.
- Users on G2 report that Docker's self-healing high availability feature is rated at 8.2, which some find lacking compared to Azure Container Registry's more robust offerings in this area, leading to concerns about reliability in critical applications.
- Reviewers say that both products provide automatic security updates, but Azure Container Registry has a slight edge with a higher rating of 8.6, indicating a more proactive approach to security, which is crucial for users handling sensitive data.
- Users mention that while both products have similar ratings for ease of setup (8.8), Azure Container Registry's overall ease of use rating of 9.0 suggests a smoother onboarding process, making it more appealing for new users.
This tool is reliable and in addition to being similar to others that we have used, it is much easier to use, it is excellent for its ease and the registration process is well explained with good instructions, also the Azure service portal is incredible and...
First contact I had with this tool was when I needed to pull a legacy PostgreSQL application. It was super easy to find the Official PGSQL repository and ready its Dockerfile contents. There I could find the Github project where that file points to,...
The automated image build tools are the main reason this would be worth paying for and they are quite poor. The lack features and development seems to be very slow. Some time back Docker bought up a company making something like this, so perhaps that's...
This tool is reliable and in addition to being similar to others that we have used, it is much easier to use, it is excellent for its ease and the registration process is well explained with good instructions, also the Azure service portal is incredible and...
First contact I had with this tool was when I needed to pull a legacy PostgreSQL application. It was super easy to find the Official PGSQL repository and ready its Dockerfile contents. There I could find the Github project where that file points to,...
The automated image build tools are the main reason this would be worth paying for and they are quite poor. The lack features and development seems to be very slow. Some time back Docker bought up a company making something like this, so perhaps that's...
