- Home
- ...
- Load Balancing Software
- Azure Application Gateway
- F5 NGINX Ingress Controller
- Azure Application Gateway-vs-F5 NGINX Ingress Controller
Compare Azure Application Gateway and F5 NGINX Ingress Controller 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.7% of reviews)
Mid-Market (64.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Azure Application Gateway
Star Rating
(198)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (43.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Application GatewayF5 NGINX Ingress Controller
Star Rating
(17)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (64.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about F5 NGINX Ingress ControllerSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Azure Application Gateway excels in security monitoring with a score of 9.4, highlighting its robust features like Web Application Firewall (WAF) capabilities, which reviewers mention provide excellent protection against common web vulnerabilities.
- Reviewers mention that F5 NGINX Ingress Controller shines in ease of use, scoring 9.1, with many users praising its intuitive interface and straightforward setup process, making it a preferred choice for mid-market companies.
- G2 users note that Azure Application Gateway has strong application-layer controls, scoring 9.4, which allows for fine-tuned traffic management and routing, a feature that users say is crucial for enterprise-level applications.
- Users on G2 report that F5 NGINX Ingress Controller offers superior performance and reliability with a score of 9.2, with many reviewers mentioning its ability to handle high traffic loads efficiently, making it ideal for dynamic environments.
- Reviewers say that Azure Application Gateway's logging and reporting features are highly rated at 9.1, with users appreciating the detailed insights it provides for monitoring application performance and security events.
- Users report that F5 NGINX Ingress Controller has excellent API integrations, scoring 8.8, with many mentioning its flexibility in connecting with various third-party services, which enhances its functionality in diverse tech stacks.
Featured Products
Sponsored
Load Balancer Enterprise ADC
(19)
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Visit Website
Sponsored
Edgenexus ADC (Application Delivery Controller)
(11)
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Application Gateway
No pricing availableF5 NGINX Ingress Controller
No pricing availableFree Trial
Azure Application Gateway
No trial information availableF5 NGINX Ingress Controller
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
135
9.3
16
Ease of Use
8.7
135
9.1
16
Ease of Setup
8.5
92
9.0
14
Ease of Admin
8.6
88
8.8
14
Quality of Support
8.5
133
9.3
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
86
9.4
12
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
123
9.3
16
Features by Category
Analysis
9.1
11
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
9.4
11
Not enough data
Controls
9.4
11
Not enough data
9.2
11
Not enough data
9.4
11
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
11
Not enough data
8.9
11
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Usability - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance Optimization - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance - Load Balancing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Application Gateway and F5 NGINX Ingress Controller are categorized as Load Balancing
Unique Categories
Azure Application Gateway is categorized as Web Application Firewall (WAF)
F5 NGINX Ingress Controller is categorized as Container Networking
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Application Gateway
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
F5 NGINX Ingress Controller
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
27.6%
Computer Software
11.5%
Computer & Network Security
5.7%
Telecommunications
4.0%
Hospital & Health Care
3.4%
Other
47.7%
Information Technology and Services
29.4%
Internet
11.8%
Computer & Network Security
11.8%
Consulting
5.9%
Telecommunications
5.9%
Other
35.3%
Most Helpful Reviews
Azure Application Gateway
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Dushyant T.
Verified User in Construction
a cost effective solution of cloud management system. security is also great in this app
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
No proper documentation. No proper API support. Very very slow to update settings No proper dashboard for Metrics
F5 NGINX Ingress Controller
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Ease of use implementation set up and deployment
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
additional WAF like components need to be crafted manually (or purchase F5's) compared to traefik's where you can still use their plug-ins without subscribing to their paid offering. I have also stopped using any traditional ingress with the Gateway API...
Dushyant T.
Verified User in Construction
a cost effective solution of cloud management system. security is also great in this app
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Ease of use implementation set up and deployment
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
No proper documentation. No proper API support. Very very slow to update settings No proper dashboard for Metrics
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
additional WAF like components need to be crafted manually (or purchase F5's) compared to traefik's where you can still use their plug-ins without subscribing to their paid offering. I have also stopped using any traditional ingress with the Gateway API...
Alternatives
Discussions
dvsdvsdvsdvsdvsd
1 comment
EA
The string "ccczzz" does not contain recognizable words or phrases in any known language, so it cannot be translated into English. It may be a sequence of...Read more
What is the best way I can use App gateway for multiple applications ?
1 comment
AD
You'd configure your applications to all live under separate domains, subdomains or paths behind your application gateway.
Consider having WordPress CMS,...Read more
Azure Application Gateway has no more discussions with answers
F5 NGINX Ingress Controller has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
