Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare AWS WAF and Barracuda Web Application Firewall 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
HAProxy
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (36.1% of reviews)
Mid-Market (72.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
AWS WAF
Star Rating
(68)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (36.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AWS WAFBarracuda Web Application Firewall
Star Rating
(12)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (72.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Barracuda Web Application FirewallSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that AWS WAF excels in "Application-Layer Controls" with a score of 9.2, indicating strong capabilities in protecting web applications from common threats. In contrast, Barracuda Web Application Firewall, while still effective, received a slightly lower score in this area, suggesting it may not be as robust in application-layer security.
- Reviewers mention that AWS WAF offers superior "Security Monitoring" features, scoring 8.8, which allows for real-time threat detection and response. Barracuda, while competent, scored lower in this category, indicating that users may find AWS WAF more reliable for ongoing security oversight.
- G2 users highlight AWS WAF's "Performance and Reliability" with a score of 9.1, suggesting that it consistently delivers high performance under load. Barracuda's performance is solid but does not match the same level of reliability, which could be a concern for users with high traffic websites.
- Users on G2 report that AWS WAF's "API / Integrations" score of 8.9 reflects its strong compatibility with other AWS services, making it a preferred choice for businesses already using AWS infrastructure. Barracuda's integration capabilities are good but may not offer the same seamless experience for AWS users.
- Reviewers say that AWS WAF's "Logging and Reporting" features, scoring 8.3, provide comprehensive insights into traffic and threats, which is crucial for compliance and security audits. Barracuda's logging capabilities are effective but may lack some of the depth and detail that AWS WAF offers.
- Users report that AWS WAF's "Product Direction" score of 9.0 indicates a strong commitment to continuous improvement and innovation, which is a significant factor for long-term users. Barracuda, with a perfect score of 10.0, also shows a strong product direction, but AWS WAF's consistent updates and enhancements are frequently praised by its user base.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AWS WAF
No pricing availableBarracuda Web Application Firewall
No pricing availableFree Trial
AWS WAF
No trial information availableBarracuda Web Application Firewall
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
45
9.0
5
Ease of Use
8.2
45
8.3
5
Ease of Setup
8.1
30
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.3
30
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.8
41
8.3
5
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
29
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
45
10.0
5
Features by Category
Analysis
8.3
22
Not enough data
8.0
20
Not enough data
8.9
22
Not enough data
Controls
9.2
21
Not enough data
8.7
21
Not enough data
8.7
21
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
20
Not enough data
8.2
19
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
7.7
10
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Protection
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Resolution
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
AWS WAF and Barracuda Web Application Firewall are categorized as Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Unique Categories
AWS WAF has no unique categories
Barracuda Web Application Firewall is categorized as DDoS Protection
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
AWS WAF
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Barracuda Web Application Firewall
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
21.3%
Computer Software
9.8%
Marketing and Advertising
8.2%
Computer & Network Security
8.2%
Retail
6.6%
Other
45.9%
Information Technology and Services
18.2%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
9.1%
Telecommunications
9.1%
Real Estate
9.1%
Furniture
9.1%
Other
45.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is AWS WAF used for?
1 Comment
PG
Web application firewalls are used for protection of web applications from owasp top 10 vulnerabilities basis on different CVEs. AWS WAF is nothing but...Read more
AWS WAF has no more discussions with answers
Barracuda Web Application Firewall has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
