- Home
- ...
- Container Management Software
- AWS Fargate
- Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
- AWS Fargate-vs-Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Compare AWS Fargate and Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) 
- Users report that Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) excels in its "Access Control" feature, scoring 8.9, which reviewers mention provides robust security measures for managing user permissions effectively. In contrast, AWS Fargate, with a score of 8.7, offers solid access control but lacks some of the advanced features found in AKS.
- Reviewers mention that AKS has a slight edge in "Orchestration" with a score of 8.4, highlighting its seamless integration with Azure DevOps for CI/CD pipelines. AWS Fargate, scoring 8.6, is praised for its ease of use but may not offer the same level of orchestration capabilities as AKS.
- Users on G2 report that the "Developer Toolkit" in AWS Fargate, scoring 8.4, is more user-friendly and provides better documentation, making it easier for developers to get started. In comparison, AKS scores lower at 7.8, with reviewers noting that its toolkit can be less intuitive for new users.
- G2 users highlight that AKS's "Network Isolation" feature, with a score of 8.3, is particularly beneficial for enterprises needing stringent security protocols. AWS Fargate, scoring 8.6, also offers good network isolation but may not meet the same level of enterprise requirements as AKS.
- Reviewers mention that both platforms perform well in "Container Networking," each scoring 8.5, but users report that AKS provides more advanced networking features, such as Azure CNI, which allows for better integration with existing Azure services.
- Users say that while both products have their strengths, AKS's overall "Product Direction" score of 9.6 indicates a strong commitment to future enhancements, which reviewers appreciate. AWS Fargate, with a score of 8.9, is also seen as reliable but may not have the same level of innovation as AKS.
Deploying applications without managing infrastructure management is a great advantage.Pay for what you use model is good. In other clouds, somewhat similar service is there but we prefer AWS as we have our production designed and running on AWS.
Pricing part of aws fargate is a little complex you can check thier document for more info. You willl have less control over your infrastructure as aws allocate and deallocate the containers independently low level stuff is handled by aws only.
Seamless orchestration of the docker containers for all your needs.
Support has not been that helpful, though they do try. I don't like that we can't have windows nodes and that we can't have nodes different sizes.
Deploying applications without managing infrastructure management is a great advantage.Pay for what you use model is good. In other clouds, somewhat similar service is there but we prefer AWS as we have our production designed and running on AWS.
Seamless orchestration of the docker containers for all your needs.
Pricing part of aws fargate is a little complex you can check thier document for more info. You willl have less control over your infrastructure as aws allocate and deallocate the containers independently low level stuff is handled by aws only.
Support has not been that helpful, though they do try. I don't like that we can't have windows nodes and that we can't have nodes different sizes.
