- Home
- ...
- Continuous Delivery Tools
- AWS CodePipeline
- Google Cloud Build
- AWS CodePipeline-vs-Google Cloud Build
Compare AWS CodePipeline and Google Cloud Build 
- Users report that AWS CodePipeline excels in its Deployment-Ready Staging feature, achieving a high score of 9.2, which allows for seamless transitions between development and production environments. In contrast, Google Cloud Build also scores 9.2 in this area, but users mention that its integration with other Google services enhances the overall deployment experience.
- Reviewers mention that Google Cloud Build outshines AWS CodePipeline in Integration, scoring 9.3 compared to AWS's 8.6. Users appreciate the ease of connecting with various third-party tools and services, which streamlines their CI/CD processes.
- Users on G2 highlight that AWS CodePipeline's Automation capabilities are robust, with a score of 8.6, but Google Cloud Build takes the lead with a score of 9.3. Reviewers say that Google Cloud Build's automation features, such as automatic triggers for builds, significantly reduce manual intervention.
- G2 users report that AWS CodePipeline has a solid score of 8.4 in Processes and Workflow, but Google Cloud Build excels with a score of 9.4. Users mention that Google Cloud Build's intuitive interface and workflow management tools make it easier to visualize and manage complex CI/CD pipelines.
- Reviewers mention that while AWS CodePipeline has a decent score of 8.8 for Quality of Support, Google Cloud Build is slightly behind at 8.6. However, users appreciate the responsiveness of Google Cloud's support team, often citing quick resolution times for issues.
- Users say that AWS CodePipeline's Extensibility is rated at 7.9, which some find limiting compared to Google Cloud Build's score of 8.9. Reviewers mention that Google Cloud Build's ability to easily integrate custom build steps and scripts allows for greater flexibility in their development processes.
Coming from Jenkins, some serious features were needed to keep us on Codepipeline. One of them was the hosted deployment. For 1$ per active pipeline per month, it was a sweet deal. The service is highly scalable and deploys can be managed in auto scaling...
There really is nothing user-friendly about it, when you compare it to tools like CodeShip or Ansible. CodePipeline is a 'programmers tool' — and so it lacks the 'ease' of interacting with it, which other tools have. Consider that every functionality of...
The build specification is very straightforward and customizable. The ability to use existing build processes/steps, or to roll your own, provides great flexibility. The deep integration with other Google Cloud Platform products, like the ability to push...
Getting support was extremely confusing; trial customers are eligible for support but cannot open a support ticket, so you have to navigate through tens of pages and emails to be able to get in touch with a support representative. After investing days...
Coming from Jenkins, some serious features were needed to keep us on Codepipeline. One of them was the hosted deployment. For 1$ per active pipeline per month, it was a sweet deal. The service is highly scalable and deploys can be managed in auto scaling...
The build specification is very straightforward and customizable. The ability to use existing build processes/steps, or to roll your own, provides great flexibility. The deep integration with other Google Cloud Platform products, like the ability to push...
There really is nothing user-friendly about it, when you compare it to tools like CodeShip or Ansible. CodePipeline is a 'programmers tool' — and so it lacks the 'ease' of interacting with it, which other tools have. Consider that every functionality of...
Getting support was extremely confusing; trial customers are eligible for support but cannot open a support ticket, so you have to navigate through tens of pages and emails to be able to get in touch with a support representative. After investing days...
