Compare Autodesk CFD and SimScale 
- Users report that SimScale excels in fluid analysis with a score of 8.8, while Autodesk CFD shines in finite element analysis with a higher score of 9.1, indicating a stronger capability in structural simulations.
- Reviewers mention that Autodesk CFD offers superior 3D/solid modeling tools, scoring 8.6 compared to SimScale's 6.1, making it a better choice for users who prioritize detailed modeling capabilities.
- G2 users highlight that SimScale has a more user-friendly setup process, achieving a score of 8.9, while Autodesk CFD lacks a score in this area, suggesting that SimScale may be easier for new users to get started with.
- Users on G2 report that Autodesk CFD provides better editing tools, scoring 8.8 compared to SimScale's 6.4, which can significantly enhance the workflow for users needing to make frequent adjustments.
- Reviewers say that SimScale's quality of support is rated at 9.1, which is higher than Autodesk CFD's 8.8, indicating that users may find more reliable assistance when using SimScale.
- Users report that Autodesk CFD has a more robust integration capability, scoring 9.0 compared to SimScale's 7.7, which can be crucial for teams looking to connect their simulation tools with other software in their workflow.
The software provides tools for visualizing simulation results, including contour plots, streamlines, animations, and reports. This allows for better understanding and communication of simulation outcomes.
It lacks a lot of features, such as the ability to change the type of mesh (for example, from triangles to quad).
I'm not an engineer, but I learn to use it quite easily. For me it was a great in a moment in which I couldn't pay for nothing. Simscale permitted me to go on with my projects!
The analysis options are quite limited with respect to similar tools
The software provides tools for visualizing simulation results, including contour plots, streamlines, animations, and reports. This allows for better understanding and communication of simulation outcomes.
I'm not an engineer, but I learn to use it quite easily. For me it was a great in a moment in which I couldn't pay for nothing. Simscale permitted me to go on with my projects!
It lacks a lot of features, such as the ability to change the type of mesh (for example, from triangles to quad).
The analysis options are quite limited with respect to similar tools
