Compare ATLAS.ti and NVivo 
- Users report that NVivo's Data Querying feature scores 8.5, providing robust capabilities for analyzing qualitative data, while ATLAS.ti excels with a score of 9.7, highlighting its superior ability to handle complex queries and data relationships.
- Reviewers mention that NVivo's Ease of Use is rated at 7.8, which some find challenging, whereas ATLAS.ti shines with a score of 9.0, making it more accessible for new users and those less familiar with qualitative analysis software.
- G2 users highlight that NVivo's Reports Interface is rated at 7.2, which can be cumbersome, while ATLAS.ti's interface scores 8.6, offering a more intuitive and user-friendly experience for generating reports.
- Users on G2 report that NVivo's Collaboration / Workflow features score 7.1, indicating limitations in team functionalities, whereas ATLAS.ti receives a score of 8.9, showcasing its strong collaborative tools that facilitate co-editing and sharing among team members.
- Reviewers say that NVivo's Data Transformation capabilities are rated at 6.7, which some users find lacking, while ATLAS.ti's score of 9.0 reflects its advanced data transformation features that enhance the analysis process.
- Users report that NVivo's Quality of Support is rated at 8.0, which is satisfactory but not exceptional, while ATLAS.ti impresses with a score of 9.7, indicating a high level of customer support and responsiveness to user inquiries.
I have tried other qualitative data analysis solutions, but none of them has come close to ATLAS.ti. The software is easy to use, very reliable, does not crash, and its implementation on macOS is fantastic. Working with an extensive library of PDF files is...
While it is great for handling engineering tasks it is difficult to sort data with and to use for other purposes. It can be difficult to sort tasks and repurpose the filter features.
What I like the most about Nvivo is its ability to organize information in various ways. It can be organized by user cases, research categories, or documents. Additionally, it has many options for analyzing the information obtained from fieldwork such as...
It's a lot of front-end work that I wasn't convinced was worth the result. For the amount of money we paid for the subscription I didn't feel like the resulting utility of our code structure was radically different from when we used code in Microsoft Word...
I have tried other qualitative data analysis solutions, but none of them has come close to ATLAS.ti. The software is easy to use, very reliable, does not crash, and its implementation on macOS is fantastic. Working with an extensive library of PDF files is...
What I like the most about Nvivo is its ability to organize information in various ways. It can be organized by user cases, research categories, or documents. Additionally, it has many options for analyzing the information obtained from fieldwork such as...
While it is great for handling engineering tasks it is difficult to sort data with and to use for other purposes. It can be difficult to sort tasks and repurpose the filter features.
It's a lot of front-end work that I wasn't convinced was worth the result. For the amount of money we paid for the subscription I didn't feel like the resulting utility of our code structure was radically different from when we used code in Microsoft Word...
