Compare Flow and Waydev 
- Users report that Pluralsight Flow excels in its Repository Integration with a score of 8.8, allowing seamless connections with various version control systems, while Waydev shines even brighter with a score of 9.7, offering extensive integrations that enhance workflow efficiency.
- Reviewers mention that Waydev's Quality of Support is exceptional, scoring 9.7, with many users praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, whereas Pluralsight Flow, with a score of 8.0, has received mixed feedback regarding support timeliness.
- G2 users highlight that Waydev's Analytics and Trends feature, scoring 9.2, provides deeper insights into team performance and project progress, while Pluralsight Flow, with a score of 8.5, offers solid analytics but lacks some advanced features that users desire.
- Users on G2 report that Waydev's Testing Integration is a standout feature, scoring 8.6, which allows for better tracking of code quality and testing metrics, while Pluralsight Flow's score of 6.9 indicates a need for improvement in this area.
- Reviewers say that Pluralsight Flow's Productivity Updates feature, with a score of 8.2, is useful for tracking team output, but Waydev's higher score of 9.3 indicates a more robust and user-friendly approach to productivity tracking.
- Users report that Waydev's Historical Data Consolidation feature, scoring 9.0, is particularly beneficial for teams looking to analyze past performance, while Pluralsight Flow's score of 8.2 suggests it may not provide as comprehensive a view of historical data.
- All fundamental metrics
- Retrospective
- Proficiency
- Unlimited Repositories
- Unlimited Data Availability
- All the features from the PREMIUM plan
When working properly, the product can provide valuable insight into finding talent within your organization. It can also help find developers that struggle and improve their coding and code review practices. The product is in constant evolution.
The idea of Flow is good, but the current implementation is limited to when a PR was done, but it doesn't have what I need: How is the employee performing this sprint when compared with other sprints? Are the employees working in the same area of code...
The way that we can use the platform to evaluate our engineers team. The insights provided make me take my teams to the next level. I've tried others tools, but waydev is the most complete and stable
Customer onboarding support; product configuration; lack of kanban agile process support
When working properly, the product can provide valuable insight into finding talent within your organization. It can also help find developers that struggle and improve their coding and code review practices. The product is in constant evolution.
The way that we can use the platform to evaluate our engineers team. The insights provided make me take my teams to the next level. I've tried others tools, but waydev is the most complete and stable
The idea of Flow is good, but the current implementation is limited to when a PR was done, but it doesn't have what I need: How is the employee performing this sprint when compared with other sprints? Are the employees working in the same area of code...
Customer onboarding support; product configuration; lack of kanban agile process support
