Compare Apache Kafka and Apache Qpid 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (56.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Apache Kafka
Star Rating
(122)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache KafkaApache Qpid
Star Rating
(17)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (56.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache QpidSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Apache Kafka excels in real-time processing with a score of 9.1, making it a preferred choice for applications requiring immediate data handling. In contrast, Apache Qpid, while still strong, scores slightly lower at 8.8 in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Apache Qpid offers superior language support, scoring 9.3 compared to Kafka's 8.5. This makes Qpid a better option for teams working with diverse programming languages.
- G2 users highlight that Apache Qpid has a higher quality of support, with a score of 9.2, which is significantly better than Kafka's 7.7. This suggests that users may find more reliable assistance when issues arise with Qpid.
- Users on G2 report that Apache Kafka shines in asynchronous messaging, scoring 9.0, which is crucial for applications that require decoupled communication. Apache Qpid, while competent, scores 8.8 in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Apache Qpid provides better security monitoring, scoring 9.3 compared to Kafka's 8.1. This could be a deciding factor for organizations prioritizing data security.
- Users say that while both products have strong integration capabilities, Apache Qpid edges out with a score of 9.0 in data integration, compared to Kafka's 8.4, making it a more robust choice for users needing seamless data connectivity.
Featured Products
Sponsored
WarpStream
(0)
Stream Analytics
Visit Website
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Kafka
No pricing availableApache Qpid
No pricing availableFree Trial
Apache Kafka
No trial information availableApache Qpid
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
87
9.8
10
Ease of Use
8.6
87
8.7
10
Ease of Setup
7.9
25
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
7.7
22
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.8
78
9.2
10
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
18
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.8
84
8.5
8
Features by Category
Data
8.9
30
Not enough data
8.7
32
Not enough data
8.9
32
Not enough data
9.1
32
Not enough data
Analytics
8.3
28
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
49
8.8
7
8.5
46
9.3
7
8.4
42
8.8
7
8.1
46
9.0
7
Integration
8.8
48
8.3
7
8.4
44
9.0
7
8.1
43
8.8
7
Management
8.2
39
9.0
7
8.0
39
9.3
7
8.3
40
9.0
7
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache Kafka and Apache Qpid are categorized as Message Queue (MQ)
Unique Categories
Apache Kafka is categorized as Event Stream Processing and Stream Analytics
Apache Qpid has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache Kafka
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Apache Qpid
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
23.9%
Information Technology and Services
17.9%
Financial Services
8.5%
Banking
6.0%
Retail
4.3%
Other
39.3%
Retail
12.5%
Information Technology and Services
12.5%
Computer & Network Security
12.5%
Non-Profit Organization Management
6.3%
Marketing and Advertising
6.3%
Other
50.0%
Most Helpful Reviews
Apache Kafka
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Multiple subscribers is better option which is not available in many messaging services. It combines messaging, storage, stream processing,etc
Most Helpful Critical Review
Sahil M.
Verified User in Real Estate
The official sink and source connectors, from debezium have issues with some advanced data types, especially arrays and son, when reading from postgres WAL files.
Apache Qpid
Most Helpful Favorable Review
M J.
Verified User in Computer Software
Awesome messaging tool that actually integrates AMQP!
Most Helpful Critical Review
Verified User in Information Technology and Services
Multiple subscribers is better option which is not available in many messaging services. It combines messaging, storage, stream processing,etc
M J.
Verified User in Computer Software
Awesome messaging tool that actually integrates AMQP!
Sahil M.
Verified User in Real Estate
The official sink and source connectors, from debezium have issues with some advanced data types, especially arrays and son, when reading from postgres WAL files.
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Apache Kafka used for?
2 comments
RS
I am using Apache Kafka for event Processing. We use it to capture the new events generated by our application in our database. Currently, Kafka streams is...Read more
What is the maximum limit of the number of partitions in a Kafka topic?
1 comment
CT
The answer is closely related to the version of the Kafka broker that you are running. A reasonably up to date cluster can hold up to 4,000 partitions per...Read more
What is Apache Kafka used for?
1 comment
DV
It used this Mnemonic to remember what kafka is and what it is used for -
S - Stream Data in Real-Time:
Handles and processes live data (e.g., Uber car...Read more
Apache Qpid has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 2.5 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
Gmail.com addresses not permitted. A business domain using Google is allowed.
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
