- Home
- ...
- Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Software
- Apache Camel
- Apache ServiceMix
- Apache Camel-vs-Apache ServiceMix
Compare Apache Camel and Apache ServiceMix 
- Reviewers mention that Apache Camel has a higher ease of use rating (9.2) compared to Apache ServiceMix (8.3), indicating that users find Camel more intuitive for integration tasks.
- Users report that the quality of support for Apache Camel (8.6) is significantly better than that of Apache ServiceMix (7.6), suggesting that Camel users feel more supported in their implementation and troubleshooting efforts.
- G2 users highlight that Apache Camel's product direction rating (7.1) is perceived as less favorable compared to Apache ServiceMix (7.9), indicating that users may have more confidence in the future development of ServiceMix.
- Users on G2 mention that Apache Camel shines with its extensive library of components, making it easier to connect various systems, while Apache ServiceMix is noted for its robust OSGi support, which is crucial for enterprise-level applications.
- Reviewers say that Apache Camel's integration patterns are more flexible and easier to implement, which is a significant advantage for developers looking to streamline workflows, whereas ServiceMix is often praised for its stability in large-scale deployments.
- Users report that while both products cater to different market segments, Apache ServiceMix is favored by larger enterprises (38.5% of reviews) for its comprehensive features, while Apache Camel is more popular among small businesses (40.0% of reviews) due to its user-friendly approach.
Flexibility. Ease of use and integration with multiple sources via connectors
It is too basic if you are looking for more customization
Easy to set and start manipulation. Integration support is the best. It can be operated either on Java SE and Java EE. Effective client API provided.
ServiceMix was an awesome stack maybe 4-5 years ago, when there were few ways to do immutable hot deploys, and OSGi leaned towards the simpler end of the Java stack. However, it's nearly 2020, and this is a Docker & Microservices world now. Since I'd...
Flexibility. Ease of use and integration with multiple sources via connectors
Easy to set and start manipulation. Integration support is the best. It can be operated either on Java SE and Java EE. Effective client API provided.
It is too basic if you are looking for more customization
ServiceMix was an awesome stack maybe 4-5 years ago, when there were few ways to do immutable hot deploys, and OSGi leaned towards the simpler end of the Java stack. However, it's nearly 2020, and this is a Docker & Microservices world now. Since I'd...
