Compare Ansys CFX and Ansys Fluent 
- Users report that Ansys CFX excels in fluid analysis with a score of 9.3, while Ansys Fluent, although strong, has a slightly lower score of 8.9. Reviewers mention that CFX's capabilities in simulating complex fluid flows are particularly beneficial for users in the enterprise sector.
- Reviewers mention that Ansys Fluent offers superior quality of support with a score of 8.5 compared to CFX's 7.2. Users on G2 appreciate Fluent's responsive customer service and extensive documentation, which aids in troubleshooting and learning.
- G2 users highlight that Ansys Fluent has a better ease of setup score of 8.4, while CFX lacks this metric. Users say that Fluent's intuitive installation process makes it more accessible for small businesses and new users.
- Users report that Ansys CFX shines in finite element analysis with a score of 8.2, while Fluent does not provide this feature, making CFX a more versatile choice for users needing comprehensive analysis tools.
- Reviewers mention that Ansys Fluent has a higher product direction score of 8.8, indicating a more positive outlook on future updates and features, which is crucial for users looking for long-term software viability.
- Users on G2 say that both products have similar ease of use ratings at 8.0, but reviewers mention that CFX's specific tools for fluid dynamics are more tailored for advanced users, while Fluent is more user-friendly for beginners.
In the CFX, adaptive networking can be used for GGI interfaces and single domains without restricted physics. It is a software that has a very high performance in turbo machines and has proven itself in this field. CFX is particularly good for turbo...
The ease of building models, and importing files from other design modelers is fantastic. With the acquisition of Fluent , Redhawk, and HFX this software covers all the basic needs and desires that a simulation/design engineer would need. The software can...
It can be glitchy at times and could definitely run faster. Sometimes I find myself waiting for it to load for longer than I would like.
In the CFX, adaptive networking can be used for GGI interfaces and single domains without restricted physics. It is a software that has a very high performance in turbo machines and has proven itself in this field. CFX is particularly good for turbo...
The ease of building models, and importing files from other design modelers is fantastic. With the acquisition of Fluent , Redhawk, and HFX this software covers all the basic needs and desires that a simulation/design engineer would need. The software can...
It can be glitchy at times and could definitely run faster. Sometimes I find myself waiting for it to load for longer than I would like.
