Compare Angular Material and DevExpress 
- Users report that DevExpress excels in its Component Library, achieving a perfect score of 10.0, while Angular Material scores 8.8. Reviewers mention that the extensive range of components available in DevExpress significantly enhances their development speed and flexibility.
- Reviewers say that DevExpress offers superior Quality of Support with a score of 9.7 compared to Angular Material's 8.4. Users on G2 highlight the responsiveness and helpfulness of DevExpress's support team, often resolving issues quickly and effectively.
- G2 users mention that DevExpress shines in Patching & Updates, scoring 9.6, which is higher than Angular Material's performance in this area. Reviewers appreciate the regular updates and the seamless integration of new features without disrupting their workflow.
- Users say that Angular Material has a slight edge in Ease of Use, with a score of 8.7 compared to DevExpress's 8.6. Reviewers mention that Angular Material's straightforward design and documentation make it easier for new users to get started.
- Reviewers mention that DevExpress's Customization capabilities score 9.1, allowing for extensive personalization of components, while Angular Material's customization options are perceived as more limited, scoring lower in this aspect.
- Users report that DevExpress's Documentation is highly rated at 9.7, providing comprehensive guides and tutorials, whereas Angular Material's documentation, while useful, scores slightly lower at 9.3, leading some users to seek additional resources for complex implementations.
Angular material reducing your developing time, let you stay focus on the real components you need to develop in your angular app. All you need to do is create your logic and integrate it with your material components/services/etc. you may use some of the...
Advance topics could have been better. People who are new might find it tough to understand those due to a lack of easy explanation. It is fine though for someone who has experience. I would also recommend maybe have a live compiler attached to every module...
While I use their awesome tools for C# wpf development, and they save me hours and hours of time, the really outstanding aspect of DevExpress is the support they provide. Responses to questions are always very thorough and typically include a code snippet...
The documentation and the support center for the WPF controls feels less complete than the WinForms documentation. While this is probably just my personal impression, I was almost always able to find an answer to a certain problem I had with the WinForms...
Angular material reducing your developing time, let you stay focus on the real components you need to develop in your angular app. All you need to do is create your logic and integrate it with your material components/services/etc. you may use some of the...
While I use their awesome tools for C# wpf development, and they save me hours and hours of time, the really outstanding aspect of DevExpress is the support they provide. Responses to questions are always very thorough and typically include a code snippet...
Advance topics could have been better. People who are new might find it tough to understand those due to a lack of easy explanation. It is fine though for someone who has experience. I would also recommend maybe have a live compiler attached to every module...
The documentation and the support center for the WPF controls feels less complete than the WinForms documentation. While this is probably just my personal impression, I was almost always able to find an answer to a certain problem I had with the WinForms...
