- Home
- ...
- Object Storage Solutions
- Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)
- Azure Blob Storage
- Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)-vs-Azure Blob Storage
Compare Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3) and Azure Blob Storage 
- Users report that Amazon S3 excels in scalability with a score of 9.5, allowing businesses to easily manage growing data needs, while Azure Blob Storage follows closely with a score of 9.3, which some users feel may not scale as seamlessly in certain enterprise environments.
- Reviewers mention that Amazon S3's versioning feature, rated at 9.0, provides robust data protection and recovery options, whereas Azure Blob Storage's versioning, rated at 8.7, is seen as less comprehensive, leading to concerns about data loss in some scenarios.
- G2 users highlight that Amazon S3's speed of access is rated at 9.2, which reviewers say contributes to faster data retrieval times, while Azure Blob Storage's speed of access is rated slightly higher at 9.3, indicating a competitive edge in performance for certain workloads.
- Users on G2 report that Amazon S3's redundancy features score 9.0, ensuring high data availability, while Azure Blob Storage, with a score of 8.8, is perceived to have slightly less effective redundancy options, which can be critical for mission-critical applications.
- Reviewers mention that both platforms offer strong encryption capabilities, with Amazon S3 scoring 9.1 and Azure Blob Storage at 9.2, but users note that Azure's encryption options are more flexible, allowing for easier compliance with various regulatory requirements.
- Users say that Amazon S3's infrastructure compatibility is rated at 9.1, making it a preferred choice for enterprises with diverse tech stacks, while Azure Blob Storage's compatibility score of 8.6 suggests some limitations in integration with non-Microsoft environments, which can be a drawback for some users.
I used S3 at a previous job to supplement the online storage for our clients. We used a SOAP API which worked smoothly. I don't recall any major outages or downtime that adversely affected our clients.
the fact that it does not integratew out of the box with some protocols
Azure provides exclusive feature "containers" where we can create isolated storages with the following levels: public private and Container levels which makes it more easy for us to maintain access levels. Also we can create queues, functions for our...
That it is slow, i would recommend big businesses, or those who have large databases to use it; if you have a small application, you may want to use another faster storage
I used S3 at a previous job to supplement the online storage for our clients. We used a SOAP API which worked smoothly. I don't recall any major outages or downtime that adversely affected our clients.
Azure provides exclusive feature "containers" where we can create isolated storages with the following levels: public private and Container levels which makes it more easy for us to maintain access levels. Also we can create queues, functions for our...
the fact that it does not integratew out of the box with some protocols
That it is slow, i would recommend big businesses, or those who have large databases to use it; if you have a small application, you may want to use another faster storage
