Compare Amazon Redshift and Panoply 
- Users report that Amazon Redshift excels in data loading capabilities, with a score of 9.7, making it a preferred choice for organizations that prioritize fast data ingestion. In contrast, Panoply's loading score is lower, which may affect users who require rapid data updates.
- Reviewers mention that Panoply shines in ease of setup, scoring 9.4 compared to Amazon Redshift's 8.6. This makes Panoply a more attractive option for small businesses or teams with limited technical resources looking for a quick deployment.
- G2 users highlight that Panoply offers superior data integration capabilities, scoring 9.1 against Amazon Redshift's 8.8. This is particularly beneficial for users who need to connect multiple data sources seamlessly.
- Users on G2 indicate that Amazon Redshift has a robust performance scalability score of 8.9, which is higher than Panoply's 8.1. This suggests that Redshift may be better suited for enterprises expecting significant growth in data volume.
- Reviewers say that Panoply provides a better overall quality of support, with a score of 9.3 compared to Amazon Redshift's 8.5. This could be a deciding factor for users who value responsive customer service and assistance.
- Users report that while both platforms offer data security features, Amazon Redshift scores slightly higher in data governance (8.7) compared to Panoply (7.8), indicating a stronger focus on compliance and data management for enterprise users.
- Commit to save up to 34%
- Managed data warehouse included
- Use of all Panoply connectors
- Unlimited users
It is fast, we can use it concurrently and we can use SQL over it so we don't have to learn a new language. The Redshift dashboard allow us to cancel request that take too much ressources. We can optimize to allow the request to run faster (with indexing)...
It's only on AWS. That's why I can't really recommend this product unless you know you're going to stay on AWS forever. It really offers no differentiation from any other noSQL store and in fact has less features and reliability over most of the tried and...
There are several connectors making it easy to fetch, store, and access your data all in one spot. No database manager needed. Easy to get up and running. Fairly quick queries.
It turned out that there wasn't actually a right fit for our tech stack, and they couldn't really adequately protect our private/sensitive data. Due to a number of reasons we couldn't make use of the product – however they charged us for it anyway. As...
It is fast, we can use it concurrently and we can use SQL over it so we don't have to learn a new language. The Redshift dashboard allow us to cancel request that take too much ressources. We can optimize to allow the request to run faster (with indexing)...
There are several connectors making it easy to fetch, store, and access your data all in one spot. No database manager needed. Easy to get up and running. Fairly quick queries.
It's only on AWS. That's why I can't really recommend this product unless you know you're going to stay on AWS forever. It really offers no differentiation from any other noSQL store and in fact has less features and reliability over most of the tried and...
It turned out that there wasn't actually a right fit for our tech stack, and they couldn't really adequately protect our private/sensitive data. Due to a number of reasons we couldn't make use of the product – however they charged us for it anyway. As...
