Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Ansys HFSS and Cadence PSpice 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.2% of reviews)
Mid-Market (54.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Ansys HFSS
Star Rating
(40)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (47.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Ansys HFSSCadence PSpice
Star Rating
(11)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (54.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Cadence PSpiceSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Ansys HFSS excels in finite element analysis with a score of 9.1, making it a preferred choice for those needing detailed electromagnetic simulations, while Allegro PSpice Simulator, although strong in continuous event modeling with a score of 8.7, does not match the depth of analysis provided by HFSS.
- Reviewers mention that the PCB layout editing feature in Allegro PSpice Simulator scores 8.6, which is highly regarded for its intuitive interface, whereas Ansys HFSS lacks a dedicated PCB layout tool, focusing more on 3D modeling and electromagnetic field simulations.
- G2 users highlight that Ansys HFSS offers robust 3D/solid modeling tools with a score of 7.5, which are essential for users needing comprehensive design capabilities, while Allegro PSpice Simulator's 3D modeling tools score lower at 7.2, indicating a potential gap in functionality for users focused on 3D designs.
- Users on G2 report that Allegro PSpice Simulator shines in its schematic editor with a score of 8.8, making it easier for engineers to create and modify circuit designs, while Ansys HFSS's schematic capabilities are not as emphasized, leading to a less favorable comparison in this area.
- Reviewers say that Ansys HFSS's quality of support is rated at 8.5, which is higher than Allegro PSpice Simulator's 7.8, indicating that users may find more reliable assistance and resources when using HFSS for their projects.
- Users report that customization options in Allegro PSpice Simulator are strong, with a custom interface score of 9.2, allowing for tailored user experiences, while Ansys HFSS, although offering custom commands at 8.7, does not provide the same level of interface customization, which may affect user satisfaction.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Ansys HFSS
No pricing availableCadence PSpice
No pricing availableFree Trial
Ansys HFSS
No trial information availableCadence PSpice
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
32
9.3
9
Ease of Use
8.6
32
8.0
9
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.6
28
7.8
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
28
8.7
9
Features by Category
Design
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.8
7
Tools
Not enough data
7.2
6
Not enough data
8.3
7
Library
Not enough data
7.9
8
Platform
Not enough data
7.6
7
Not enough data
8.1
7
Customization
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.2
6
Design
7.7
22
Not enough data
8.0
22
Not enough data
8.0
22
Not enough data
7.9
17
Not enough data
Tools
8.5
8
Not enough data
9.1
17
Not enough data
8.8
8
Not enough data
Work
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
Environment
8.1
12
Not enough data
8.6
15
Not enough data
8.3
12
Not enough data
8.4
17
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Ansys HFSS and Cadence PSpice are categorized as PCB Design
Unique Categories
Ansys HFSS is categorized as Simulation & CAE
Cadence PSpice has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Ansys HFSS
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Cadence PSpice
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Wireless
19.4%
Research
19.4%
Higher Education
19.4%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
19.4%
Telecommunications
5.6%
Other
16.7%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
27.3%
Semiconductors
9.1%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
9.1%
Marketing and Advertising
9.1%
Higher Education
9.1%
Other
36.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Hfss used for?
1 Comment
HK
HFSS is used for Full-wave EM simulation Read more
Ansys HFSS has no more discussions with answers
Cadence PSpice has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
