When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Windows Movie Maker easier to use, set up, and administer. However, reviewers preferred doing business with Adobe After Effects overall.
I like how After Effects integrates with softwares like Cinema 4D & Redshift, as well as Action VFX and a myraid of other plugins that make compositing workflows easier. In relation to Action VFX I really like their standard passes and masks that make...
I don't feel like the user interface is very suer friendly.
Simplicity, ease-of-use and essentially zero-cost are the features I most enjoy. As most of the computers in the company run Windows, it makes sharing much easier than having to make different videos to suit different platforms, This saves me time as well...
Lack of fine tune adjustments and advanced features in editing, such as overlays, path movements, advanced video quality enhancements and filters, and sound editing options, are missing.
I like how After Effects integrates with softwares like Cinema 4D & Redshift, as well as Action VFX and a myraid of other plugins that make compositing workflows easier. In relation to Action VFX I really like their standard passes and masks that make...
Simplicity, ease-of-use and essentially zero-cost are the features I most enjoy. As most of the computers in the company run Windows, it makes sharing much easier than having to make different videos to suit different platforms, This saves me time as well...
I don't feel like the user interface is very suer friendly.
Lack of fine tune adjustments and advanced features in editing, such as overlays, path movements, advanced video quality enhancements and filters, and sound editing options, are missing.