When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found 3DPrinterOS easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with 3DPrinterOS overall.
It is best because we can see the object very clearly by printing. Nice Software.
The system has a very step learning curve and is very difficult to use and implement. I see the costs as way to high to absorb.
Robust handling of large assemblies. Best-in-class feature solver. Highly-disciplined constraint management. Application stability. Memory management.
Have used many different CAD packages over the span of my 25+ years as a mechanical engineer and this software is a relic of the 90's. It has not kept up with the times and the ever changing environment of CAD design, the best days of PTC are far behind...
It is best because we can see the object very clearly by printing. Nice Software.
Robust handling of large assemblies. Best-in-class feature solver. Highly-disciplined constraint management. Application stability. Memory management.
The system has a very step learning curve and is very difficult to use and implement. I see the costs as way to high to absorb.
Have used many different CAD packages over the span of my 25+ years as a mechanical engineer and this software is a relic of the 90's. It has not kept up with the times and the ever changing environment of CAD design, the best days of PTC are far behind...