Best Software for 2025 is now live!
|| products.size

Best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Software - Page 2

Lauren Worth
LW
Researched and written by Lauren Worth

Data loss prevention (DLP) software, also known as data leak prevention software, is used to secure control and ensure compliance of sensitive business information. A key component of DLP solutions is distribution control, which ensures users do not send private information outside of corporate business networks. Security staff and network administrators set business rules that determine who can view, change, and share confidential data. DLP tools often control data on both the network and endpoint level to ensure policies remain consistent across the company. These tools are used to ensure the protection of data and prevent leaks by internal sources.

There are overlaps between DLP tools and some governance, risk & compliance (GRC) software, but these tools are specifically geared toward data control. DLP solutions are also used alongside backup software, but as a complement to the software rather than a replacement.

To qualify for inclusion in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, a product must:

Monitor data storage and sharing for compliance
Allow administrative control over data governance
Detect data leaks or misuse
Facilitate data identification and discovery

Best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Software At A Glance

Best for Small Businesses:
Best for Mid-Market:
Highest User Satisfaction:
Best Free Software:
Show LessShow More
Highest User Satisfaction:
Best Free Software:

G2 takes pride in showing unbiased reviews on user satisfaction in our ratings and reports. We do not allow paid placements in any of our ratings, rankings, or reports. Learn about our scoring methodologies.

No filters applied
117 Listings in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Available
(27)4.4 out of 5
8th Easiest To Use in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Data is the fuel that powers your business—protecting it is critical. But traditional data protection oversteps where it isn't needed and impedes your team’s productivity. In today’s remote culture, b

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Banking
    Market Segment
    • 59% Enterprise
    • 26% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Forcepoint Enterprise Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Cloud Services
    1
    Data Protection
    1
    Email Security
    1
    Performance Speed
    1
    Cons
    Complexity
    1
    Ineffective Blocking
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Forcepoint Enterprise Data Loss Prevention (DLP) features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.7
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.9
    8.7
    Access Control
    Average: 8.6
    8.5
    Compliance
    Average: 9.0
    9.0
    Data Visibility
    Average: 8.8
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    1994
    HQ Location
    Austin, TX
    Twitter
    @Forcepointsec
    67,705 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    1,899 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Data is the fuel that powers your business—protecting it is critical. But traditional data protection oversteps where it isn't needed and impedes your team’s productivity. In today’s remote culture, b

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Banking
Market Segment
  • 59% Enterprise
  • 26% Mid-Market
Forcepoint Enterprise Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Cloud Services
1
Data Protection
1
Email Security
1
Performance Speed
1
Cons
Complexity
1
Ineffective Blocking
1
Forcepoint Enterprise Data Loss Prevention (DLP) features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.7
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
8.7
Access Control
Average: 8.6
8.5
Compliance
Average: 9.0
9.0
Data Visibility
Average: 8.8
Seller Details
Year Founded
1994
HQ Location
Austin, TX
Twitter
@Forcepointsec
67,705 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
1,899 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Fortra’s Digital Guardian is Data Loss Prevention that gives you immediate visibility into your organization’s critical assets, protecting data and intellectual property wherever it lives. Our platfor

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Computer & Network Security
    • Hospital & Health Care
    Market Segment
    • 44% Mid-Market
    • 41% Enterprise
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Fortra's Digital Guardian Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Data Protection
    16
    Protection
    12
    Security
    11
    Threat Detection
    5
    Cloud Services
    3
    Cons
    Learning Difficulty
    6
    Complexity
    4
    Difficult Setup
    4
    Complex Configuration
    3
    Poor Interface Design
    3
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Fortra's Digital Guardian features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    7.7
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.9
    8.8
    Access Control
    Average: 8.6
    8.7
    Compliance
    Average: 9.0
    9.0
    Data Visibility
    Average: 8.8
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Fortra
    Year Founded
    1982
    HQ Location
    Eden Prairie, Minnesota
    Twitter
    @fortraofficial
    2,407 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    1,774 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Fortra’s Digital Guardian is Data Loss Prevention that gives you immediate visibility into your organization’s critical assets, protecting data and intellectual property wherever it lives. Our platfor

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Computer & Network Security
  • Hospital & Health Care
Market Segment
  • 44% Mid-Market
  • 41% Enterprise
Fortra's Digital Guardian Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Data Protection
16
Protection
12
Security
11
Threat Detection
5
Cloud Services
3
Cons
Learning Difficulty
6
Complexity
4
Difficult Setup
4
Complex Configuration
3
Poor Interface Design
3
Fortra's Digital Guardian features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
7.7
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
8.8
Access Control
Average: 8.6
8.7
Compliance
Average: 9.0
9.0
Data Visibility
Average: 8.8
Seller Details
Seller
Fortra
Year Founded
1982
HQ Location
Eden Prairie, Minnesota
Twitter
@fortraofficial
2,407 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
1,774 employees on LinkedIn®

This is how G2 Deals can help you:

  • Easily shop for curated – and trusted – software
  • Own your own software buying journey
  • Discover exclusive deals on software
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Financial Services
    Market Segment
    • 59% Mid-Market
    • 27% Enterprise
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Data Protection
    1
    Detection Efficiency
    1
    Email Security
    1
    Monitoring
    1
    Cons
    Limited Features
    1
    Update Issues
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.5
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.9
    8.6
    Access Control
    Average: 8.6
    9.2
    Compliance
    Average: 9.0
    9.7
    Data Visibility
    Average: 8.8
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Microsoft
    Year Founded
    1975
    HQ Location
    Redmond, Washington
    Twitter
    @microsoft
    14,031,499 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    238,990 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    MSFT
Users
No information available
Industries
  • Financial Services
Market Segment
  • 59% Mid-Market
  • 27% Enterprise
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Data Protection
1
Detection Efficiency
1
Email Security
1
Monitoring
1
Cons
Limited Features
1
Update Issues
1
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.5
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
8.6
Access Control
Average: 8.6
9.2
Compliance
Average: 9.0
9.7
Data Visibility
Average: 8.8
Seller Details
Seller
Microsoft
Year Founded
1975
HQ Location
Redmond, Washington
Twitter
@microsoft
14,031,499 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
238,990 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
MSFT
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Netskope is the leader in cloud security — we help the world’s largest organizations take advantage of cloud and web without sacrificing security. Our Cloud XD™ technology targets and controls activit

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Computer & Network Security
    Market Segment
    • 61% Enterprise
    • 30% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Netskope One Platform Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Security
    8
    Features
    7
    Ease of Use
    6
    Data Protection
    3
    Data Security
    3
    Cons
    Access Issues
    2
    Complex Configuration
    2
    Connection Issues
    2
    Expensive
    2
    Integration Issues
    2
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Netskope One Platform features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.5
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.9
    8.5
    Access Control
    Average: 8.6
    7.9
    Compliance
    Average: 9.0
    8.9
    Data Visibility
    Average: 8.8
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Netskope
    Year Founded
    2012
    HQ Location
    Santa Clara, CA
    Twitter
    @Netskope
    11,131 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    2,621 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Netskope is the leader in cloud security — we help the world’s largest organizations take advantage of cloud and web without sacrificing security. Our Cloud XD™ technology targets and controls activit

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Computer & Network Security
Market Segment
  • 61% Enterprise
  • 30% Mid-Market
Netskope One Platform Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Security
8
Features
7
Ease of Use
6
Data Protection
3
Data Security
3
Cons
Access Issues
2
Complex Configuration
2
Connection Issues
2
Expensive
2
Integration Issues
2
Netskope One Platform features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.5
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
8.5
Access Control
Average: 8.6
7.9
Compliance
Average: 9.0
8.9
Data Visibility
Average: 8.8
Seller Details
Seller
Netskope
Year Founded
2012
HQ Location
Santa Clara, CA
Twitter
@Netskope
11,131 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
2,621 employees on LinkedIn®
(352)4.7 out of 5
11th Easiest To Use in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Avanan, a Check Point Company, catches the advanced attacks that evade default and advanced security tools. Its invisible, multi-layer security enables full-suite protection for cloud collaboration so

    Users
    • IT Manager
    • Systems Administrator
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    • Financial Services
    Market Segment
    • 61% Mid-Market
    • 23% Enterprise
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Avanan Cloud Email Security Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Email Security
    29
    Security
    28
    Protection
    24
    Ease of Use
    18
    Phishing Protection
    18
    Cons
    Complexity
    16
    Complex Setup
    11
    Configuration Difficulties
    9
    Difficult Setup
    9
    Complex Processes
    7
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Avanan Cloud Email Security features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.2
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.9
    9.2
    Access Control
    Average: 8.6
    9.3
    Compliance
    Average: 9.0
    9.1
    Data Visibility
    Average: 8.8
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    1993
    HQ Location
    San Carlos, CA
    Twitter
    @CheckPointSW
    71,144 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    7,920 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    NASDAQ:CHKP
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Avanan, a Check Point Company, catches the advanced attacks that evade default and advanced security tools. Its invisible, multi-layer security enables full-suite protection for cloud collaboration so

Users
  • IT Manager
  • Systems Administrator
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
  • Financial Services
Market Segment
  • 61% Mid-Market
  • 23% Enterprise
Avanan Cloud Email Security Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Email Security
29
Security
28
Protection
24
Ease of Use
18
Phishing Protection
18
Cons
Complexity
16
Complex Setup
11
Configuration Difficulties
9
Difficult Setup
9
Complex Processes
7
Avanan Cloud Email Security features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.2
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
9.2
Access Control
Average: 8.6
9.3
Compliance
Average: 9.0
9.1
Data Visibility
Average: 8.8
Seller Details
Year Founded
1993
HQ Location
San Carlos, CA
Twitter
@CheckPointSW
71,144 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
7,920 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
NASDAQ:CHKP
(27)4.9 out of 5
5th Easiest To Use in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Strac is a 1-stop shop for all things PII (Personally Identifiable Information). Strac is a Data Loss Prevention software that protects businesses from security and compliance risks by a) automaticall

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Financial Services
    Market Segment
    • 52% Small-Business
    • 48% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Strac Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Data Protection
    20
    Data Security
    19
    Customer Support
    18
    Security
    18
    Ease of Use
    17
    Cons
    Limited Features
    3
    Authentication Issues
    1
    Inefficient Search Functionality
    1
    Limitations
    1
    Limited Compatibility
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Strac features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.7
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.9
    7.8
    Access Control
    Average: 8.6
    9.0
    Compliance
    Average: 9.0
    9.4
    Data Visibility
    Average: 8.8
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Strac
    Year Founded
    2021
    HQ Location
    Bellevue, Washington
    Twitter
    @securewithstrac
    82 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    11 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Strac is a 1-stop shop for all things PII (Personally Identifiable Information). Strac is a Data Loss Prevention software that protects businesses from security and compliance risks by a) automaticall

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Financial Services
Market Segment
  • 52% Small-Business
  • 48% Mid-Market
Strac Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Data Protection
20
Data Security
19
Customer Support
18
Security
18
Ease of Use
17
Cons
Limited Features
3
Authentication Issues
1
Inefficient Search Functionality
1
Limitations
1
Limited Compatibility
1
Strac features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.7
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
7.8
Access Control
Average: 8.6
9.0
Compliance
Average: 9.0
9.4
Data Visibility
Average: 8.8
Seller Details
Seller
Strac
Year Founded
2021
HQ Location
Bellevue, Washington
Twitter
@securewithstrac
82 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
11 employees on LinkedIn®
Entry Level Price:Starting at $5.00
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    CurrentWare is a remote employee monitoring, data loss prevention, internet management, and cybersecurity software suite. Each module can be purchased individually or as a full suite for the best valu

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 42% Small-Business
    • 35% Mid-Market
    User Sentiment
    How are these determined?Information
    These insights, currently in beta, are compiled from user reviews and grouped to display a high-level overview of the software.
    • CurrentWare is a software platform that provides USB blocking, employee monitoring, and device management capabilities.
    • Users like the robust reporting features, the ease of use and implementation, the ability to manage multiple devices, and the exceptional customer support provided by the CurrentWare team.
    • Users mentioned concerns about employee privacy due to monitoring, reliability issues compared to other filters, technical requirements for remote work settings, and occasional issues with website categorization and report exporting.
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • CurrentWare Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    24
    Customer Support
    16
    Features
    14
    Reporting
    11
    User Interface
    10
    Cons
    Limited Functionality
    5
    Complexity
    3
    Limited Features
    3
    Poor Customer Support
    3
    Poor Interface Design
    3
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • CurrentWare features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.3
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.9
    8.9
    Access Control
    Average: 8.6
    8.3
    Compliance
    Average: 9.0
    8.5
    Data Visibility
    Average: 8.8
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    2003
    HQ Location
    Mississauga, CA
    Twitter
    @CurrentWare
    638 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    23 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

CurrentWare is a remote employee monitoring, data loss prevention, internet management, and cybersecurity software suite. Each module can be purchased individually or as a full suite for the best valu

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 42% Small-Business
  • 35% Mid-Market
User Sentiment
How are these determined?Information
These insights, currently in beta, are compiled from user reviews and grouped to display a high-level overview of the software.
  • CurrentWare is a software platform that provides USB blocking, employee monitoring, and device management capabilities.
  • Users like the robust reporting features, the ease of use and implementation, the ability to manage multiple devices, and the exceptional customer support provided by the CurrentWare team.
  • Users mentioned concerns about employee privacy due to monitoring, reliability issues compared to other filters, technical requirements for remote work settings, and occasional issues with website categorization and report exporting.
CurrentWare Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
24
Customer Support
16
Features
14
Reporting
11
User Interface
10
Cons
Limited Functionality
5
Complexity
3
Limited Features
3
Poor Customer Support
3
Poor Interface Design
3
CurrentWare features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.3
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
8.9
Access Control
Average: 8.6
8.3
Compliance
Average: 9.0
8.5
Data Visibility
Average: 8.8
Seller Details
Year Founded
2003
HQ Location
Mississauga, CA
Twitter
@CurrentWare
638 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
23 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    McAfee DLP Endpoint IS A DLP app that protects intellectual property or financial data from unexpected disappearance via virtual data protection policies.

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 67% Enterprise
    • 38% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • McAfee DLP Endpoint Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    2
    Policy Management
    2
    Configuration Ease
    1
    Dashboard Usability
    1
    Data Protection
    1
    Cons
    Alert Issues
    1
    File Exporting Issues
    1
    Limitations
    1
    Slow Performance
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • McAfee DLP Endpoint features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.1
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.9
    8.7
    Access Control
    Average: 8.6
    9.0
    Compliance
    Average: 9.0
    9.0
    Data Visibility
    Average: 8.8
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    McAfee
    Year Founded
    1987
    HQ Location
    San Jose, US
    Twitter
    @McAfee_Home
    43,188 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    5,536 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    NASDAQ: MCFE
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

McAfee DLP Endpoint IS A DLP app that protects intellectual property or financial data from unexpected disappearance via virtual data protection policies.

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 67% Enterprise
  • 38% Mid-Market
McAfee DLP Endpoint Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
2
Policy Management
2
Configuration Ease
1
Dashboard Usability
1
Data Protection
1
Cons
Alert Issues
1
File Exporting Issues
1
Limitations
1
Slow Performance
1
McAfee DLP Endpoint features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.1
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
8.7
Access Control
Average: 8.6
9.0
Compliance
Average: 9.0
9.0
Data Visibility
Average: 8.8
Seller Details
Seller
McAfee
Year Founded
1987
HQ Location
San Jose, US
Twitter
@McAfee_Home
43,188 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
5,536 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
NASDAQ: MCFE
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Check Point Data Loss Prevention (DLP) combines technology and processes to revolutionize DLP, helping businesses to pre-emptively protect sensitive information from unintentional loss, educating user

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 47% Enterprise
    • 42% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Check Point Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Customer Support
    2
    Data Protection
    2
    Email Security
    2
    Implementation Ease
    2
    Integrations
    2
    Cons
    False Positives
    3
    Complexity
    2
    Expensive
    2
    Complex Configuration
    1
    Difficult Setup
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Check Point Data Loss Prevention (DLP) features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.2
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.9
    9.2
    Access Control
    Average: 8.6
    9.2
    Compliance
    Average: 9.0
    8.3
    Data Visibility
    Average: 8.8
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    1993
    HQ Location
    San Carlos, CA
    Twitter
    @CheckPointSW
    71,144 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    7,920 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    NASDAQ:CHKP
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Check Point Data Loss Prevention (DLP) combines technology and processes to revolutionize DLP, helping businesses to pre-emptively protect sensitive information from unintentional loss, educating user

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 47% Enterprise
  • 42% Mid-Market
Check Point Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Customer Support
2
Data Protection
2
Email Security
2
Implementation Ease
2
Integrations
2
Cons
False Positives
3
Complexity
2
Expensive
2
Complex Configuration
1
Difficult Setup
1
Check Point Data Loss Prevention (DLP) features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.2
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
9.2
Access Control
Average: 8.6
9.2
Compliance
Average: 9.0
8.3
Data Visibility
Average: 8.8
Seller Details
Year Founded
1993
HQ Location
San Carlos, CA
Twitter
@CheckPointSW
71,144 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
7,920 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
NASDAQ:CHKP
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Trend Micro develops server security, cloud security, and small business content security solutions.

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 49% Mid-Market
    • 30% Enterprise
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Trend Micro Smart Protection Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Protection
    2
    Customization Options
    1
    Ease of Use
    1
    Features
    1
    Patching Efficiency
    1
    Cons
    Expensive
    1
    Licensing Issues
    1
    Pricing Issues
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Trend Micro Smart Protection features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.8
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.9
    8.3
    Access Control
    Average: 8.6
    8.3
    Compliance
    Average: 9.0
    8.1
    Data Visibility
    Average: 8.8
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    1988
    HQ Location
    Tokyo
    Twitter
    @trendmicro
    113,698 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    7,572 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    OTCMKTS:TMICY
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Trend Micro develops server security, cloud security, and small business content security solutions.

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 49% Mid-Market
  • 30% Enterprise
Trend Micro Smart Protection Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Protection
2
Customization Options
1
Ease of Use
1
Features
1
Patching Efficiency
1
Cons
Expensive
1
Licensing Issues
1
Pricing Issues
1
Trend Micro Smart Protection features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.8
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
8.3
Access Control
Average: 8.6
8.3
Compliance
Average: 9.0
8.1
Data Visibility
Average: 8.8
Seller Details
Year Founded
1988
HQ Location
Tokyo
Twitter
@trendmicro
113,698 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
7,572 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
OTCMKTS:TMICY
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    McAfee Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Prevent protects against data loss by ensuring that data only leaves the network when appropriate.

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Information Technology and Services
    Market Segment
    • 42% Small-Business
    • 33% Enterprise
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • McAfee DLP Prevent Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Data Protection
    4
    Ease of Use
    3
    Customer Support
    2
    Detection Efficiency
    2
    Email Security
    2
    Cons
    Slow Performance
    3
    Complex Configuration
    1
    Expensive
    1
    False Positives
    1
    Ineffective Blocking
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • McAfee DLP Prevent features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.5
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.9
    8.5
    Access Control
    Average: 8.6
    9.0
    Compliance
    Average: 9.0
    9.2
    Data Visibility
    Average: 8.8
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    McAfee
    Year Founded
    1987
    HQ Location
    San Jose, US
    Twitter
    @McAfee_Home
    43,188 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    5,536 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    NASDAQ: MCFE
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

McAfee Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Prevent protects against data loss by ensuring that data only leaves the network when appropriate.

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Information Technology and Services
Market Segment
  • 42% Small-Business
  • 33% Enterprise
McAfee DLP Prevent Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Data Protection
4
Ease of Use
3
Customer Support
2
Detection Efficiency
2
Email Security
2
Cons
Slow Performance
3
Complex Configuration
1
Expensive
1
False Positives
1
Ineffective Blocking
1
McAfee DLP Prevent features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.5
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
8.5
Access Control
Average: 8.6
9.0
Compliance
Average: 9.0
9.2
Data Visibility
Average: 8.8
Seller Details
Seller
McAfee
Year Founded
1987
HQ Location
San Jose, US
Twitter
@McAfee_Home
43,188 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
5,536 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
NASDAQ: MCFE
(45)4.3 out of 5
14th Easiest To Use in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Zivver provides secure email communications for effortless compliance. Founded in the Netherlands in 2015, Zivver is trusted by over 10,000 organizations globally to prevent data leaks caused by hu

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Hospital & Health Care
    • Mental Health Care
    Market Segment
    • 47% Small-Business
    • 29% Mid-Market
    User Sentiment
    How are these determined?Information
    These insights, currently in beta, are compiled from user reviews and grouped to display a high-level overview of the software.
    • Zivver is a service that allows for the sending of encrypted emails to clients and other providers.
    • Users like that Zivver is easy to use, integrates well with their existing email systems, and provides a secure way to send sensitive information.
    • Reviewers mentioned that there are occasional bugs in the Zivver plugins and apps, and some found the setup and configuration process to be complex and cumbersome.
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Zivver Email Encryption Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    31
    Email Security
    24
    Security
    20
    Email Encryption
    16
    Encryption
    16
    Cons
    Email Issues
    17
    Access Issues
    9
    Difficult Setup
    9
    Technical Issues
    8
    Security Issues
    6
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Zivver Email Encryption features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.9
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.9
    9.0
    Access Control
    Average: 8.6
    9.5
    Compliance
    Average: 9.0
    8.8
    Data Visibility
    Average: 8.8
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Seller
    Zivver
    Company Website
    Year Founded
    2015
    HQ Location
    Amsterdam, Noord-Holland
    Twitter
    @zivver_en
    346 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    130 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Zivver provides secure email communications for effortless compliance. Founded in the Netherlands in 2015, Zivver is trusted by over 10,000 organizations globally to prevent data leaks caused by hu

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Hospital & Health Care
  • Mental Health Care
Market Segment
  • 47% Small-Business
  • 29% Mid-Market
User Sentiment
How are these determined?Information
These insights, currently in beta, are compiled from user reviews and grouped to display a high-level overview of the software.
  • Zivver is a service that allows for the sending of encrypted emails to clients and other providers.
  • Users like that Zivver is easy to use, integrates well with their existing email systems, and provides a secure way to send sensitive information.
  • Reviewers mentioned that there are occasional bugs in the Zivver plugins and apps, and some found the setup and configuration process to be complex and cumbersome.
Zivver Email Encryption Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
31
Email Security
24
Security
20
Email Encryption
16
Encryption
16
Cons
Email Issues
17
Access Issues
9
Difficult Setup
9
Technical Issues
8
Security Issues
6
Zivver Email Encryption features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.9
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
9.0
Access Control
Average: 8.6
9.5
Compliance
Average: 9.0
8.8
Data Visibility
Average: 8.8
Seller Details
Seller
Zivver
Company Website
Year Founded
2015
HQ Location
Amsterdam, Noord-Holland
Twitter
@zivver_en
346 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
130 employees on LinkedIn®
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    The Tessian Cloud Email Security Platform intelligently protects against advanced threats and data loss on email, while reducing security teams' workloads, and coaching people about security threats i

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Financial Services
    • Legal Services
    Market Segment
    • 57% Mid-Market
    • 43% Enterprise
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Proofpoint Adaptive Email Security Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Email Security
    7
    Security
    6
    Ease of Use
    5
    AI Technology
    4
    Artificial Intelligence
    4
    Cons
    Ineffective Notifications
    2
    Limited Features
    2
    Poor Customer Support
    2
    Poor Detection
    2
    Alert Issues
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Proofpoint Adaptive Email Security features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.8
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.9
    8.8
    Access Control
    Average: 8.6
    8.8
    Compliance
    Average: 9.0
    8.9
    Data Visibility
    Average: 8.8
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    2002
    HQ Location
    Sunnyvale, CA
    Twitter
    @proofpoint
    30,844 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    4,697 employees on LinkedIn®
    Ownership
    NASDAQ: PFPT
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

The Tessian Cloud Email Security Platform intelligently protects against advanced threats and data loss on email, while reducing security teams' workloads, and coaching people about security threats i

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Financial Services
  • Legal Services
Market Segment
  • 57% Mid-Market
  • 43% Enterprise
Proofpoint Adaptive Email Security Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Email Security
7
Security
6
Ease of Use
5
AI Technology
4
Artificial Intelligence
4
Cons
Ineffective Notifications
2
Limited Features
2
Poor Customer Support
2
Poor Detection
2
Alert Issues
1
Proofpoint Adaptive Email Security features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.8
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
8.8
Access Control
Average: 8.6
8.8
Compliance
Average: 9.0
8.9
Data Visibility
Average: 8.8
Seller Details
Year Founded
2002
HQ Location
Sunnyvale, CA
Twitter
@proofpoint
30,844 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
4,697 employees on LinkedIn®
Ownership
NASDAQ: PFPT
(18)4.9 out of 5
Optimized for quick response
7th Easiest To Use in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) software
Save to My Lists
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    Material Security is a multi-layered detection and response toolkit for Google Workspace and Microsoft 365, combining email security, data governance and posture management in a single platform. We

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    No information available
    Market Segment
    • 44% Enterprise
    • 39% Mid-Market
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • Material Security Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Security
    3
    Detection Efficiency
    2
    Easy Integrations
    2
    Email Security
    2
    Integrations
    2
    Cons
    Complex Configuration
    1
    Complexity
    1
    Configuration Difficulties
    1
    Email Filtering Issues
    1
    Limitations
    1
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • Material Security features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    9.8
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.9
    9.5
    Access Control
    Average: 8.6
    9.7
    Compliance
    Average: 9.0
    9.8
    Data Visibility
    Average: 8.8
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Company Website
    Year Founded
    2017
    HQ Location
    Redwood City, US
    Twitter
    @material_sec
    1,060 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    108 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

Material Security is a multi-layered detection and response toolkit for Google Workspace and Microsoft 365, combining email security, data governance and posture management in a single platform. We

Users
No information available
Industries
No information available
Market Segment
  • 44% Enterprise
  • 39% Mid-Market
Material Security Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Security
3
Detection Efficiency
2
Easy Integrations
2
Email Security
2
Integrations
2
Cons
Complex Configuration
1
Complexity
1
Configuration Difficulties
1
Email Filtering Issues
1
Limitations
1
Material Security features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
9.8
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
9.5
Access Control
Average: 8.6
9.7
Compliance
Average: 9.0
9.8
Data Visibility
Average: 8.8
Seller Details
Company Website
Year Founded
2017
HQ Location
Redwood City, US
Twitter
@material_sec
1,060 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
108 employees on LinkedIn®
Entry Level Price:$1.20
  • Overview
    Expand/Collapse Overview
  • Product Description
    How are these determined?Information
    This description is provided by the seller.

    GAT Labs build tools that help complement the power of Google Workspace and Chrome for Enterprise and Education domains with auditing, management, security, automation and insights. Today, GAT is the

    Users
    No information available
    Industries
    • Education Management
    • Primary/Secondary Education
    Market Segment
    • 62% Mid-Market
    • 24% Enterprise
  • Pros and Cons
    Expand/Collapse Pros and Cons
  • GAT Labs Pros and Cons
    How are these determined?Information
    Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
    Pros
    Ease of Use
    18
    Customer Support
    17
    Features
    14
    Google Workspace Integration
    12
    Productivity Efficiency
    11
    Cons
    Complexity
    7
    Poor Interface Design
    6
    Poor Interface
    5
    Difficult Navigation
    4
    Learning Difficulty
    4
  • User Satisfaction
    Expand/Collapse User Satisfaction
  • GAT Labs features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
    8.0
    Ease of Use
    Average: 8.9
    9.4
    Access Control
    Average: 8.6
    7.5
    Compliance
    Average: 9.0
    9.6
    Data Visibility
    Average: 8.8
  • Seller Details
    Expand/Collapse Seller Details
  • Seller Details
    Year Founded
    2014
    HQ Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    Twitter
    @GATlabs_
    4,492 Twitter followers
    LinkedIn® Page
    www.linkedin.com
    17 employees on LinkedIn®
Product Description
How are these determined?Information
This description is provided by the seller.

GAT Labs build tools that help complement the power of Google Workspace and Chrome for Enterprise and Education domains with auditing, management, security, automation and insights. Today, GAT is the

Users
No information available
Industries
  • Education Management
  • Primary/Secondary Education
Market Segment
  • 62% Mid-Market
  • 24% Enterprise
GAT Labs Pros and Cons
How are these determined?Information
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Pros
Ease of Use
18
Customer Support
17
Features
14
Google Workspace Integration
12
Productivity Efficiency
11
Cons
Complexity
7
Poor Interface Design
6
Poor Interface
5
Difficult Navigation
4
Learning Difficulty
4
GAT Labs features and usability ratings that predict user satisfaction
8.0
Ease of Use
Average: 8.9
9.4
Access Control
Average: 8.6
7.5
Compliance
Average: 9.0
9.6
Data Visibility
Average: 8.8
Seller Details
Year Founded
2014
HQ Location
Dublin, Ireland
Twitter
@GATlabs_
4,492 Twitter followers
LinkedIn® Page
www.linkedin.com
17 employees on LinkedIn®