Audit Management Software Resources

Great question - searching and adding customizations one by one is definitely a bit of a manual process. We recently added a few ways for you to do this more efficiently. You can search for customizations and filter by Type, Bundle ID, Date Range, Users that last modified, or any combination of those. This should allow you to pull up a more specific list of customizations and multi-select to add them all at once. If you have any other ideas that might help, please let us know! We're going to put together a short video of this process and add it to the resource index on our website and we'll have your CSM reach out to you directly. Thanks!

Show More

Show Less

It depends on what you mean by “implemented.” If you’re talking about a fully mature, integrated ERM program, that’s a multi-year journey. Most organizations take 1–2 years just to establish a compliant ERM program, and significantly longer to make it truly embedded in decision-making. ERM is not a one-time project. It’s an ongoing discipline. That said, you don’t need to wait years to get value. With a structured approach and the right technology, organizations can stand up a functional ERM framework much faster. For example, with LogicManager, implementation is designed to take about 90 days to get to a point where: • Risks are identified and assessed consistently • Reporting is standardized • Leadership has visibility into risk The difference comes down to execution. Without software, ERM often gets slowed down by spreadsheets, siloed processes, and manual coordination. With purpose-built ERM software, you’re accelerating what is otherwise a very manual process.

Show More

Show Less

Building a business case for ERM starts with shifting the conversation from “we need software” to “here’s the risk we’re carrying today and the value we’re missing.” A practical way to do that: 1. Start with current pain points Most organizations rely on spreadsheets or disconnected tools. That leads to inconsistent risk language, manual reporting, and limited visibility. It also creates real exposure. Spreadsheets lack audit trails, are prone to errors, and make it difficult to aggregate and report risk data 2. Quantify inefficiency and hidden costs Risk teams often spend more than half their time collecting data and building reports instead of managing risk. That’s time leadership is paying for but not getting value from You can frame this simply: • How many hours are spent chasing data? • How long does it take to produce a board report? • Where are we duplicating work across teams? 3. Highlight the risk of inaction Without a structured system, you have blind spots. Risks stay siloed, root causes go unnoticed, and leadership lacks a complete picture. In many cases, organizations don’t realize the same risk is being managed multiple times in different departments 4. Connect ERM to real outcomes ERM is not just about compliance. It helps: • Reduce fraud, waste, and errors • Improve decision-making with better data • Eliminate duplicate work across teams • Increase transparency from the front line to the board 5. Use maturity as a benchmark Frameworks like the Risk Maturity Model (RMM) help show where your program stands today and what improvement looks like. More mature programs are not just more organized. They are more repeatable, more scalable, and more valuable to the business 6. Tie it to financial impact This is what leadership cares about most. Research shows organizations with mature ERM programs can see up to a 25% increase in firm value You can also point to: • Time savings from automation • Reduced audit and compliance costs • Avoided losses from missed risks At the end of the day, a strong business case for ERM is not about buying a tool. It’s about showing that your current approach creates inefficiency, blind spots, and real financial risk, while a structured, risk-based program improves performance and protects the organization.

Show More

Show Less