What is Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Software?

The main purpose of using multi-factor authentication (MFA) software is for increased security when users log in to accounts. Companies use this software to ensure only authorized users—such as employees, contractors, or customers have secure access to specific company accounts. This helps prevent both insider threats, such as unauthorized employees from accessing sensitive data, and external threats, like cybercriminals deploying phishing attacks for data breaches, from accessing restricted accounts. MFA requires users to complete additional authentication steps to prove their identity prior to being granted access to applications, systems, or sensitive information. The software helps secure accounts by providing additional security using a layered, multi-step authentication approach. Generally, the first step to authenticate a user’s identity includes a standard username and password login process. After this initial login attempt, the second step might require users to enter a code provided by a software app on a mobile device, a hardware token like a key fob, or a code sent to a user via (SMS) text message, email, or phone call. Other authentication steps might include presenting a biometric like a fingerprint or a faceprint, or presenting other identifying signals like the user’s typical IP address, their device ID, or via behavioral factors verified by risk-based authentication (RBA) tools. What Does MFA Stand For? MFA stands for multi-factor authentication. It requires two or more different authentication factors. This software may also be referred to as two-factor authentication (2FA) or two-step verification when employing exactly two different authentication factors. What are the factors of authentication? MFA software requires users to authenticate with some or all of the following five factors: Single-factor authentication: Single-factor authentication requires users to authenticate with something they know. The most common single-factor authentication is password-based authentication. This is considered insecure because many people use weak passwords or passwords that are easily compromised. Two-factor authentication: Two-factor authentication requires users to authenticate with something they have. It requires users to provide the information they have, usually, a code provided by an authenticator app on their mobile devices, SMS or text message, software token (soft token), or hardware token (hard token). The code provided can be either an HMAC-based one-time password (HOTP) which does not expire until used, or a time-based one-time password (TOTP) that expires in 30 seconds. Three-factor authentication: Three-factor authentication requires users to authenticate with what they are. It takes into account something unique to the user such as biometric factors. They can include fingerprint scans, finger geometry, palmprint or hand geometry scans, and facial recognition. Using biometrics for authentication is becoming increasingly common as biometric logins on mobile devices, including facial recognition software and fingerprint scanning capabilities, have gained in popularity among consumers. Other biometric authentication methods, such as ear shape recognition, voiceprints, retina scans, iris scans, DNA, odor identity, gait patterns, vein patterns, handwriting and signature analysis, and typing recognition, have not yet been widely commercialized for MFA purposes. Four-factor authentication: Four-factor authentication requires users to authenticate with where they are and when. It considers a user’s geographic location and the time it took for them to get there. Usually, these authentication methods do not require a user to actively authenticate this information, instead, this runs in the background when determining a specific user’s authentication risk. Four-factor authentication verifies a user’s geolocation, which points to where they currently are and their geo-velocity, which is the reasonable amount of time it takes for a person to travel to a given location. For example, if a user authenticates with an MFA software provider in Chicago and 10 minutes later attempts to authenticate from Moscow, there is a security issue. Five-factor authentication: Five-factor authentication requires users to authenticate with something they do. It relates to specific gestures or touch patterns that users generate. For example, using a touch-screen enabled with a relatively new OS, that supports the feature, users can create a picture password where they draw circles, straight lines, or tap an image to create a unique gesture password. What Types of Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Software Exist? There are several kinds of MFA software. In addition to standard MFA functionality, many companies are moving toward RBA software, also known as intelligent MFA, which uses risk monitoring to determine when to request users for authentication. The different types of authentication methods can include: Mobile apps: A common way users prefer to authenticate is using MFA software’s mobile app. Software token: Software tokens enable users to use MFA mobile apps including wearable devices. Using software tokens is considered more secure than using OTP via SMS, since these messages can be intercepted by hackers. Software tokens can be used when offline, making it convenient for end users who may not have access to the internet. Push notifications: Push notifications make authentication simple for end users. A notification is sent to a user’s mobile device asking them to approve or deny the authentication request. Convenience is crucial for user adoption of MFA tools. Hardware token: Hardware tokens are pieces of hardware users carry with them to authenticate their identity. Examples include OTP key fobs, USB devices, and smart cards. Common issues with hardware tokens include the hardware’s expense plus the added cost of replacements when users lose them. One-time passwords (OTP) via SMS, voice, or email: Users who can’t use mobile apps on their phones can opt to use OTP sent to their mobile devices via SMS text message, voice call, or email. However, receiving authentication codes via SMS is considered one of the least secure ways to authenticate users. Risk-based authentication (RBA) software: RBA, also known as intelligent or adaptive MFA, uses real-time information about end users to evaluate their risk and prompt them to authenticate when needed. RBA software analyzes IP addresses, devices, behaviors, and identities to set personalized authentication methods for each distinct user attempting to access the network. Passwordless authentication: Passwordless authentication, also known as invisible authentication, relies on RBA factors such as location, IP address, and other user behaviors. Push notifications are considered passwordless authentication, as a user is not required to enter a code, but merely asked to accept or reject an authentication request. Biometrics: Biometric authentication factors, such as facial and fingerprint recognition, are gaining popularity among consumers, and therefore, MFA software providers are beginning to support them. Currently, other biometric factors, such as iris scanning, are not available in MFA tools. One issue with using biometrics for authentication is that once they are compromised, they are compromised forever. MFA as a service: Tying in with a company’s cloud-based directories, some MFA providers offer cloud-based MFA as a service solution. These often support multiple authentication methods including push notifications, software tokens, hardware tokens, online and offline authentication, and biometrics. On-premises MFA: On-premises MFA solutions run on a company’s server. Many software vendors are phasing out these kinds of MFA solutions and pushing customers to cloud-based solutions. Offline-available MFA: Users who need to authenticate, but do not have access to the internet, can use MFA solutions with offline support. For example, many federal employees work in controlled, secure environments and might not have access to the internet. Federal government civilian employees might use personal identity verification (PIV) cards to authenticate, while the Department of Defense employees authenticate using a common access card (CAC). For general civilians, they can authenticate offline using a mobile app with offline access to OTPs or one that uses a hardware-based U2F security key. Enterprise solutions: Companies that manage MFA deployments to many users need robust solutions and will opt for software with administrator consoles, endpoint visibility, and connect with single sign-on (SSO) software.

What are the Common Features of Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Software?

The following are some core features within MFA software that can help users authenticate via multiple modalities. Multiple authentication methods: To meet diverse needs, end users may like to authenticate in different ways. These might include OTPs sent via SMS, voice, email, push notifications sent to mobile devices, biometrics like fingerprints or facial recognition, hardware tokens such as key fobs, or fast identity online (FIDO) devices. Different software offer various kinds of authentication methods. It’s important to consider what type of authentication would work best for a specific organization. Supports access types: Ensuring MFA software works with a company’s existing cloud applications, local and remote desktops, web, VPN, and other applications is important. Prebuilt APIs: Developers adding MFA software in their applications may seek a provider with a prebuilt API for ease of development. Many software providers offer branded MFA functionality to maintain the look and feel of a developer’s own applications. Supports FIDO protocols: FIDO is a set of protocols based on public-key encryption created by the FIDO Alliance that is more secure than OTPs. FIDO supports authentication of almost any type, including USB, near-field communication (NFC), and Bluetooth. FIDO protocols are the basis of passwordless authentication. Self-registration and self-help portals: Positive user experience is critical for end-user adoption of MFA software. Many providers offer self-registration processes for end users, as well as self-service portals which save the deployment team’s time. Administrator tools: Administrators need tools to help them be most effective in deploying MFA software, as well as meeting company policies. Some MFA providers allow administrators to limit MFA to specific IP addresses or applications and specific geographical or secure locations. Many MFA tools have policy settings that restrict end users from using jailbroken devices. When employees leave or change roles, some MFA providers offer automatic deprovisioning features. Other Features of Multi-Factor Authentication Software: Backup Capabilities, Biometric Factor Capabilities, Compound Capabilities, Email Capabilities, Hardware Capabilities, Mobile SDK Capabilities, Multi-Device Sync Capabilities, Phone Capabilities, Point Capabilities, Risk-based Capabilities, SMS Capabilities, Voice-Based Telephony Capabilities, Web SDK Capabilities

Best Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Software: User Reviews from September 2026

Google Authenticator

Google Authenticator ist eine mobile Anwendung, die von Google entwickelt wurde, um die Sicherheit von Online-Konten durch Zwei-Faktor-Authentifizierung (2FA) zu erhöhen. Durch die Generierung zeitbasierter Einmalpasswörter (TOTPs) bietet sie eine zusätzliche Schutzschicht über traditionelle Passwörter hinaus, um sicherzustellen, dass nur autorisierte Benutzer auf ihre Konten zugreifen können. Die App ist mit Android-, iOS- und BlackBerry-Geräten kompatibel und somit ein vielseitiges Werkzeug für Benutzer, die ihre Online-Sicherheit stärken möchten. Hauptmerkmale und Funktionalität: - Zeitbasierte Einmalpasswörter (TOTPs): Generiert sechsstellige Codes, die alle 30 Sekunden aktualisiert werden und dynamische Sicherheitstoken für die Kontoverifizierung bereitstellen. - Unterstützung mehrerer Konten: Ermöglicht es Benutzern, die Authentifizierung für verschiedene Konten innerhalb einer einzigen App zu verwalten und den 2FA-Prozess zu vereinfachen. - Offline-Funktionalität: Funktioniert ohne Netzwerk- oder Mobilfunkverbindung, um den Zugriff auf Authentifizierungscodes jederzeit und überall zu gewährleisten. - QR-Code-Einrichtung: Ermöglicht eine schnelle und einfache Kontohinzufügung durch das Scannen von QR-Codes und vereinfacht den Einrichtungsprozess. - Kontosynchronisierung: Ermöglicht es Benutzern, ihre Authentifizierungscodes über mehrere Geräte hinweg zu synchronisieren, indem sie mit ihrem Google-Konto verknüpft werden, um die Kontinuität auch bei Verlust eines Geräts sicherzustellen. - Datenschutzbildschirm: Führt eine zusätzliche Sicherheitsmaßnahme ein, indem Geräteanmeldeinformationen (PIN, Fingerabdruck oder Gesichtserkennung) erforderlich sind, um auf die App zuzugreifen und sensible Authentifizierungscodes vor unbefugtem Zugriff zu schützen. Primärer Wert und Benutzerbenefits: Google Authenticator adressiert das wachsende Bedürfnis nach erhöhter Online-Sicherheit, indem es eine zuverlässige und benutzerfreundliche Methode zur Implementierung der Zwei-Faktor-Authentifizierung bietet. Durch die Generierung zeitkritischer Codes, die zusätzlich zu Standardpasswörtern erforderlich sind, wird das Risiko eines unbefugten Kontozugriffs erheblich reduziert, selbst wenn Anmeldeinformationen kompromittiert sind. Die Offline-Funktionalität der App stellt sicher, dass Benutzer auf ihre Authentifizierungscodes zugreifen können, ohne auf Netzwerkverbindungen angewiesen zu sein, und bietet in verschiedenen Szenarien Sicherheit. Darüber hinaus verbessern Funktionen wie Kontosynchronisierung und der Datenschutzbildschirm sowohl die Benutzerfreundlichkeit als auch die Sicherheit, was Google Authenticator zu einem wertvollen Werkzeug für Einzelpersonen und Organisationen macht, die ihre digitalen Vermögenswerte schützen möchten.

Average Rating: 4.6/5.0

Total Reviews: 574

How Do G2 Users Rate Google Authenticator?

War the product ein guter Geschäftspartner?: 9.3/10 (Category avg: 9.0/10)
Synchronisierung mit mehreren Geräten: 8.8/10 (Category avg: 9.0/10)
Einfache Einrichtung: 9.5/10 (Category avg: 9.0/10)
verstärkung: 8.5/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)

Who Is the Company Behind Google Authenticator?

Verkäufer: Google
Gründungsjahr: 1998
Hauptsitz: Mountain View, CA
Twitter: @google
31,899,995 Twitter-Follower
LinkedIn®-Seite: www.linkedin.com
301,144 Mitarbeiter*innen auf LinkedIn®
Eigentum: NASDAQ:GOOG

Who Uses This Product?

Who Uses This: Eigentümer, Gründer
Top Industries: Informationstechnologie und Dienstleistungen, Computersoftware
Company Size: 45% Small, 37% Medium

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Google Authenticator?

AI-generated summary from verified user reviews

Pros

Benutzer schätzen die Benutzerfreundlichkeit von Google Authenticator und finden es schnell und zuverlässig zur Sicherung von Konten.
Benutzer schätzen die äußerst sichere Natur von Google Authenticator, die einen robusten Schutz für ihre Konten bietet.
Benutzer schätzen die einfache Einrichtung von Google Authenticator, wodurch die Sicherheitsverbesserung nahtlos und unkompliziert wird.
Benutzer schätzen die starke Zwei-Faktor-Authentifizierungssicherheit von Google Authenticator, die den Kontoschutz mühelos verbessert.
Benutzer schätzen die zeitsparende Effizienz von Google Authenticator und genießen die schnelle Einrichtung und sofortige Codegenerierung.

Cons

Benutzer sind frustriert über die fehlenden Funktionen in Google Authenticator, wie Cloud-Backup und einfache Kontowiederherstellung.
Benutzer finden Authentifizierungsprobleme frustrierend, bevorzugen einfachere Optionen und stehen vor Synchronisierungsproblemen, die den Zugriff erschweren.
Benutzer äußern Bedenken über unzureichende Sicherheit im Google Authenticator, insbesondere hinsichtlich Backup- und Zugriffsschwachstellen.
Benutzer stehen vor Herausforderungen bei der Passwortverwaltung aufgrund fehlender Cloud-Backups und Schwierigkeiten bei der Wiederherstellung von Codes nach dem Verlust von Geräten.
Benutzer empfinden die begrenzten Funktionen von Google Authenticator als hinderlich für die Benutzerfreundlichkeit im Vergleich zu anderen Sicherheits-Apps.

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Google Authenticator?

"Einfach, kostenlos, nahtlos integrierte 2FA. Tut, was nötig ist."

Rating: 4.5/5.0 stars

— Pratham A.

Product	Best for	User Review
Google Authenticator 4.6/5(582)	Offline TOTP code generation for multi-account 2FA	"Simple, Free, Seamlessly Integrated 2FA. Does what is needed"
Cisco Duo 4.5/5(519)	Push-based MFA with device trust verification	"Cisco DUO has been our most reliable 2FA solution so far"
Microsoft Entra ID 4.5/5(913)	Microsoft-native MFA with conditional access policies	"Entra ID P2 Makes Conditional Access and Security Policies Easy to Configure"
1Password 4.6/5(1,812)	Password autofill with integrated TOTP authentication	"One-Place Password Management with 1Password"
LastPass 4.5/5(2,087)	Password vault with built-in MFA storage	"Seamless Cross-Platform Vaults, Easy Admin Console, and Strong Password Tools"
Keeper Password Manager 4.6/5(1,234)	Shared credential vaults with embedded TOTP	"Valuable New Features, but Better Communication Would Help"
NordPass Business 4.5/5(642)	Password sharing with integrated TOTP authentication	"Enhances Security with Group Sharing"
Auth0 4.3/5(277)	Developer-first authentication with extensible MFA flows	"Auth0 Makes Secure Authentication Easy for a Beginner Developer"
MSG91 4.5/5(199)	OTP delivery with SMS failover routing	"MSG91: Fast, Dependable Messaging with Easy API Integration"
IBM Verify CIAM 4.3/5(186)	Adaptive MFA with centralized CIAM governance	"Easy SSO & MFA Management with a Helpful Login Activity Dashboard"

Best Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Software

How Many Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Software Products Does G2 Track?

Category Stats (Sep 2026)

How Does G2 Rank Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Software Products?

G2 Grid® for Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) Software

How Do G2 Users Rate Google Authenticator?

Who Is the Company Behind Google Authenticator?

Who Uses This Product?

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Google Authenticator?

Pros

Cons

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Google Authenticator?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About Google Authenticator?

How Do G2 Users Rate Cisco Duo?

Who Is the Company Behind Cisco Duo?

Who Uses This Product?

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Cisco Duo?

Pros

Cons

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Cisco Duo?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About Cisco Duo?

How Do G2 Users Rate Microsoft Entra ID?

Who Is the Company Behind Microsoft Entra ID?

Who Uses This Product?

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Microsoft Entra ID?

Pros

Cons

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Microsoft Entra ID?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About Microsoft Entra ID?

G2 Deal: Try 1Password for Free

How Do G2 Users Rate 1Password?

Who Is the Company Behind 1Password?

Who Uses This Product?

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About 1Password?

Pros

Cons

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of 1Password?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About 1Password?

How Do G2 Users Rate LastPass?

Who Is the Company Behind LastPass?

Who Uses This Product?

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About LastPass?

Pros

Cons

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of LastPass?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About LastPass?

G2 Deal: Try Keeper for Free

How Do G2 Users Rate Keeper Password Manager?

Who Is the Company Behind Keeper Password Manager?

Who Uses This Product?

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Keeper Password Manager?

Pros

Cons

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Keeper Password Manager?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About Keeper Password Manager?

G2 Deal: 20% OFF 2-year Business Plan

How Do G2 Users Rate NordPass Business?

Who Is the Company Behind NordPass Business?

Who Uses This Product?

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About NordPass Business?

Pros

Cons

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of NordPass Business?

How Do G2 Users Rate Auth0?

Who Is the Company Behind Auth0?

Who Uses This Product?

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About Auth0?

Pros

Cons

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of Auth0?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About Auth0?

How Do G2 Users Rate MSG91?

Who Is the Company Behind MSG91?

Who Uses This Product?

What Do G2 Reviewers Say About MSG91?

Pros

Cons

What Are Recent G2 Reviews of MSG91?

What Are G2 Users Discussing About MSG91?

How Do G2 Users Rate IBM Verify CIAM?