Website Monitoring Software

There’s honestly not much I dislike about LogRocket, as it’s a really valuable tool in my day-to-day work. If I had to mention something, it would be that finding specific sessions or identifying patterns across multiple users can sometimes be a bit time-consuming, especially when analyzing experiments or complex user flows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use it to investigate why users abandon a flow, detect bugs that are difficult to reproduce, and understand how users interact with new features or experiment variations.

The biggest benefits are very practical: we can quickly identify where and why users get stuck, share session recordings with developers to speed up bug resolution, and prioritize improvements based on real user behavior. When running A/B tests, it also helps us understand what's driving the results, not just which variant performs better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While NinjaOne was more expensive compared to other RMM solutions our team evaluated, the professionalism and value it provides absolutely justifies the cost. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

NinjaOne is indispensable in our IT environment for its robust remote monitoring and troubleshooting capabilities. It ensures all company devices consistently adhere to the latest software and OS updates, maintaining compliance seamlessly. Furthermore, it enables instant remote access, enabling our team to promptly address and resolve any user issues. This significantly enhances our operational efficiency and user satisfaction. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

When data is ingested into Coralogix, additional metadata is added before the data is stored. As a result, the overall data volume reported in Coralogix ends up being about 2 to 3 times higher than the original source data. Coralogix then charges units based on the volume reported in Coralogix, which includes this metadata overhead. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Since this is a managed observability platform, we don’t have to worry about the platform’s maintenance or scalability. Before coralogix, proactive monitoring was difficult with basic alerting capabilities. Coralogix also offers strong alerting and dashboarding features, which significantly improve our overall monitoring. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The initial setup and configuration can take a while, especially if you’re monitoring multiple services across different environments. Because there are so many features and options, the interface can feel overwhelming for someone who’s new to observability tools, and it takes time to learn where everything is. Pricing is another concern, since data ingestion can grow quickly as application logs and traces get larger. At times there can also be too many alerts, so you end up spending extra time tuning thresholds to cut down on unnecessary notifications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

New Relic helps us spot application performance issues and production errors before they turn into bigger problems. Previously, debugging something across multiple backend services meant manually checking different logs and servers. With New Relic, we can trace a request end to end, pinpoint slow database queries, review error rates, and quickly see which service is responsible. This cuts down debugging time and makes it easier for developers to investigate production issues without having to rely on multiple teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sentry has grown to cover a lot of ground, and not every team needs every feature. I'd like to be able to switch off the features we don't use so they're hidden from the navigation. That would simplify the interface for our team and make it quicker to get to the parts we rely on every day. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We've used Sentry for a little over three years to keep on top of production errors in our application. Before, finding the cause of a bug meant piecing together logs and user reports. Now errors are caught as they happen with the context needed to understand them, and because they're wired into our automated fix workflow through webhooks, many issues are being worked on before a customer has to report them. Tracing slow requests and database queries has made performance problems much easier to pin down, and event tracking gives us insight into how people actually use the product, which helps us prioritise what to improve. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are only a few things that I was not satisfied with Datadog, those are. Cost is somewhat high; we have to pay even we utilize the resources or not.

And the main con is the customer support; they only deal via email, and we have to dump the log data into their storage. They first analyse the logs and come back to us; it will typically take 24-36 hours, which has an impact on the clients. Also, they only come on a call on production issues. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Wide range, like we need to sit in front of the servers or app all the time. If there is any error, it will send an email or notifications regarding the error. So no need to worry. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

CubeAPM doesn’t have an app monitoring module as of yet. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

CubeAPM helps us detect and resolve performance issues across our e-commerce platform before they affect customers.

Earlier, we struggled with identifying slow APIs, checkout delays, and backend errors during traffic peaks. With CubeAPM’s unified visibility across metrics, logs, and traces, our teams can now pinpoint the root cause instantly.

The biggest benefit has been a noticeable drop in incident resolution time (MTTR) and smoother customer journeys during sale events. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some issues require site visits which have nothing to do with RMM. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

A lab PC is three months behind on Windows updates and failing a compliance check. Patching pushes the missing updates after hours, confirms they installed, and clears the flag without a campus visit. A front-desk machine is frozen mid-enrollment. Remote control puts you on the session in about a minute, you kill the stuck process, and the adviser stays on the phone with the applicant. Disk space on a shared workstation hits the alert threshold before the user notices. You clear the cache and the temp files from the console. The ticket never gets written. A laptop drops off the network overnight. The agent shows it last checked in, whether it is online now, and which switch port it was on. You know if it is asleep, unplugged, or actually down before anyone drives over. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only thing I would suggest to improve is the service reliability. There are a few instances where we have to restart the services when monitoring drops out. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Problem: In modern applications built using microservices architecture, monitoring each service individually and understanding their interactions can be complex and challenging.

Solution: Instana provides automatic discovery and mapping of microservices, offering visibility into the entire application stack. This simplifies monitoring and troubleshooting in microservices-based environments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. Although dashboards have improved, certain configurations and investigations still require navigating through multiple screens. 2. The platform offers many apps, but new users need significant time for training to become comfortable with features like DQL, Grail, advanced dashboard creation etc.. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. Unified observability: Having logs, metrics, traces, RUM, Synthetic monitoring, and infrastructure data in a single platform makes troubleshooting more efficient. 2. Root Cause Analysis - The AI driven problem detection and automatic dependency significantly reduces the time required to identify the root cause. 3. End to End visibility - The ability to trace a user transaction from browser through application, services, database etc.. provides complete visibility into application performance and customer experience. 4. Additionally, the customizable dashboards, alerting capabilities and DQL make it easier to create reports and dashboards that can be shared with leaders/stakeholders. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

So far, I haven't found any drawbacks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It guarantees me a completely stable network. Previously, I had many wifi problems; when working with a large volume of data for my job, my NAS server did not function as smoothly and reliably as it does now. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think the main downside for me with Better Stack is the pricing. Initially, everything was great, but as our team grew and we needed to add access or addons for the status page feature, the costs started to climb. It seems a bit faster in terms of pricing increases than what a solo developer or a small team might expect. That was a bit of a con for me. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Better Stack for downtime checks and incident alerts without needing a heavy setup. It offers a clean, simple dashboard, making it easy to monitor apps and fix issues quickly. Plus, it's generally better and easier than competitors and free to set up. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's very difficult to find something to dislike, because I feel confident that anything we would want changed, the Netbeez team would be able to accommodate it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Our organization's workers are primarily remote, and their roles very often are ones that don't come with a necessary proficiency in technology. Therefore, it is often the case that home internet/router diagnosis falls entirely on us. This tool is essential to being able to gather objective troubleshooting data among the sea of subjective reporting we get from our users to determine where the actual cause of network interruptions lies. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The user interface can feel somewhat cluttered and dense because of the wide range of features packed into the navigation tree. Moving between APM, server metrics, and network devices sometimes takes extra clicks. Custom dashboards also require some initial setup time to filter down to only the essential metrics needed for routine daily checks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It solves the challenge of tool fragmentation by centralizing host-level metrics, web endpoint availability, and synthetic checks in a single pane of glass. It eliminates the need for separate tools just to track server health and SSL lifecycles. This centralized monitoring setup has reduced Mean Time to Detect (MTTD) during unexpected infrastructure disruptions and ensures that alerts reach the team promptly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Updates some functions is better in real time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Better Traffic Engineer in our network. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The pricing model based on sensor count can become expensive as your environment grows. Every new device, interface, or metric you want to track adds up quickly, so scaling monitoring across multiple sites requires careful planning around sensor usage. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Honestly, before PRTG we usually only realized something was wrong after it had already impacted users. A lot of it came down to manual checks and guesswork. Now, with the alerts we’ve set up, we get an early warning before things go south—whether it’s a server running low on disk space, a slow link, or a device that stops responding. That has already saved us more than once from a real incident. It takes a lot of stress off the team because we’re not constantly firefighting anymore. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The permission system could be more precise for me. I have to be an Org Admin for Signal Control. I would like Least Privilege at the dataset level: the organization should manage basic settings, while a dataset should cover all permissions for that dataset. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Dash0 has become our platform. All signals finally come together there, and it simply helps us massively reduce our MTTR. Other functions like billing, permissions, tokens, etc., are just simple - simple. It is transparent and flexible. No contract terms. Additionally, we massively benefit from the technical expertise embedded in the colleagues at Dash0 through expert calls. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The user interface and menus (UI/UX) aren’t very smooth, and it can be extremely frustrating to track down hidden menu options just to complete standard tasks, such as adding a device or creating groups of devices by location or device type. For the cost of this product, these issues seem unacceptable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We can integrate all our switches, routers, and network devices from multiple vendors and view them in one place. Documentation is very helpful for using the API, which allows us to leverage AI workflows to enrich the data. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Reporting isn't good. Alerting setup is a bit complex. I had to dig through the documentation to get the email notification to work properly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

A few months ago a sudden spike in one of our core network switches. Observium flagged the interface as saturated, and I tracked it back to a misconfigured backup job. Without Observium, I probably wouldn't have caught it until users started complaining. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Not a dislike but a feature I would like to see is ExtraHop move towards prevention. Currently, the product is good at identifying and detecting suspicious or malicious activity. Prevention can be achieved through integration with tools but it would be nice to have these native to ExtraHop. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Whenever we perform penetration tests, ExtraHop is always the first tool to detect the activity. Often times, the penetration testers will start their campaigns performing reconnaissance and trying to remain stealthy. Because they are not attempting to exploit vulnerabilities at this stage and may be using legitimate system tools, these actions would usually go unnoticed. By inspecting all network traffic, ExtraHop is quick to determine unusual activity on the network host even if it is not a managed device. The network traffic can be inspected by SOC teams and actions can be taken to contain the suspicious device. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.