Furniture Manufacturing Software

Not really a major issue, but there isn’t an option to have the canvas "pop out" into a separate window. You’re confined to working within the program. I’d really like a feature like that, since I usually use my tablet as the painting area while keeping the rest of the interface on my main screen. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's solving the issue of not being able to paint traditionally due to either lack of physical materials, accessibility, etc. It provides a good medium to paint, while providing the convenience of simulating realistic traditional painting. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I would like to import or edit schedules like Excel sheets. This would bring automation to my task. I have to use the schedule to get total cubic yards of each component, like foundations and vaults, and calculate these in a separate spreadsheet. If I could add Excel and link it to the foundation schedule, it would calculate all the sums together, which would simplify the process for net cut fill in Toposolids. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Revit helps me track models in 3D, count cast-in objects, and manage soil displacement. It supports MEPFP systems coordination, clash detection, and civil coordination, making it crucial for my BIM VDC work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The software is extremely resource-intensive and often lags or crashes when working with complex, heavy 3D models or large project datasets. Because of these demands, it really requires top-tier, expensive hardware to run smoothly and avoid unexpected disruptions to our daily workflow. Additionally, the overall subscription pricing has become quite high for smaller firms or independent professionals who may not utilize every advanced tool included. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AutoCad addresses a critical issue: miscommunication between the design office and the field. Trying to explain design parameters or modifications through text messages or static PDFs often leads to costly mistakes during execution. The main benefit is having a centralized, highly reliable source of truth for layouts. With its cloud integration and mobile viewing tools, field technicians can pull up real-time 2D layouts on site to verify dimensions immediately. This helps minimize construction errors, reduce material waste, and speed up client approval cycles. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I dislike about Designcenter NX is that it can sometimes feel a bit too complex for beginners. Some features also take time to learn, and it may take a while before you can navigate the interface and tools efficiently. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Designcenter NX simplifies the design process by making modeling, modifications, and overall project workflows more efficient. It helps save time, boosts productivity, and makes complex design tasks easier to manage from start to finish. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Large assemblies can slow things down at times and I've also experienced the software crashing. When you're new to Solid Edge, some of the more advanced features take a while to figure out, so there's definitely a learning curve. That said, beyond those points I don't have any major issues with and I'd still recommend giving it a try at least once. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It helped us cut down the time we spend on repetitive design tasks and the constant back and forth on revisions. We can update models more fastest, reuse standard parts, prepare drawings and share without having to bounce between a bunch of different tools all the time. Its made daily desgin work feel a lot more manageable and easier to stay on top of. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It took me a bit of time to get comfortable with some of the advanced tools like Smart Select and IFC Import, especially coming from a different CAD workflow. I’ve also run into occasional crashes or slowdowns on larger, more complex drawings. Some AutoCAD files particularly ones with certain plugins, custom fonts, or advanced blocks don’t always render perfectly, so I sometimes have to manually fix things. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One of the biggest improvements for me is Smart Mouse and Smart Select. Earlier, I had to keep navigating through manually selecting objects one by one, especially when working on complex drawings. Now I can use quick gestures and intelligent selection options, which makes repetitive editing much faster and keeps my workflow moving.

Another feature I rely on is Smart Plotting. When I have multiple drawing sheets ready for release, I no longer need to print each one individually. Batch plotting saves a significant amount of time and reduces the chance of missing a sheet or using the wrong print settings.

IFC Import has also been valuable since I regularly receive files from teams using Revit. Earlier, exchanging data often required extra conversion steps. Now I can import IFC models directly, review the information, and continue my work without interrupting the workflow. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I haven’t noticed much that needs improvement. Sometimes an older version of SOLIDWORKS won’t open files made in a newer version, so I’d like a tool to convert files between versions. Setup can also have some problems when moving from an older version to a new one, though it’s usually easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use SOLIDWORKS for my school projects to transform ideas into CAD and STL models ready for manufacturing and printing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only dislike I have about Procreate is the fact that if I delete the app and reinstall it all my work will be gone forever. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Procreate has given me an elaborate, easy to use digital sketchbook. It feels like a trustworthy, highly functional app that I can rely on, and one I’ve stayed loyal to. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Disliking is a strong term; I just think there’s always room for improvement.

When you assign a material to a design—let’s say wood—the model should better adopt that material’s texture and color. That would go a long way toward enhancing visualization in the early stages of the design process.

I also think the simulation side could be improved (CFD, static simulation, etc.) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

These are just a few points, and not limited to the following.

First is the collaboration aspect, where everyone can access the design wherever they are and make changes as needed.

Another benefit is design sharing without the risk of copying or downloading. By simply sharing a link with clients, they can view the design even on low-cost gadgets like tablets and phones.

It also removes the need to invest in an extremely expensive computer, and it negates the need to carry your computer everywhere. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is little bit laggy with Acad DWG having large number for solids and hatches, material rendering is not upto mark Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

it solves all basic need of a mechanical+ architeural engineer need to conceptulaise the design and prepare a well document for engineering purposes, its trinity feature enables it to perform a powerfull role to collaborate all around Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some features may not be as refined or advanced as those in standard AutoCAD, particularly in terms of precision, functionality, and customization. While the software provides essential drafting tools, certain commands may have limited capabilities or lack the flexibility and efficiency of AutoCAD. Further improvements to its AI-powered features could also enhance the overall user experience, particularly in automating repetitive drafting tasks, recognizing design elements, generating commands based on user prompts, and providing more accurate and context-aware suggestions to improve workflow efficiency. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

improve this and expound "So far none"

So far, I have not encountered any significant issues or limitations. The features have been sufficient for my current needs, and the overall experience has been smooth and user-friendly. However, further use may reveal areas for improvement as I explore more of the software’s capabilities. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

it was good actually not need to make change,butit can be improved some what Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

ActCAD BIM performs well with large drawing files, integrates multiple features, is cost-effective, and has frequent updates. It also supports team collaboration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The biggest downside is how heavily it bogs down when dealing with complex meshes or high-poly organic geometry, like dense 3D scans. Translating or editing larger assemblies can cause noticeable viewport lag, and mesh-to-B-rep conversions often freeze or fail entirely. Offline capability is also fairly limited; if there is a spotty internet connection or cloud sync hiccup, saving and accessing recent assets becomes frustrating. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Before using Fusion, our team relied on separate software packages for basic 3D CAD modeling, generative concept exploration, and additive manufacturing pre-processing. Passing CAD files back and forth across different tools regularly caused translation errors, broken surface references, and lost revision tracking.

Fusion brought solid modeling, CAM setup, and additive slicing into a single pipeline. We can take a design directly from parametric sketches to print orientation and support generation without touching standalone converter tools. This unified setup has cut our prototype turnaround from initial concept to physical print setup by roughly 35% and completely eliminated file sync conflicts across our machines. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One limitation is that DraftSight is primarily focused on 2D drafting, so it does not replace a full 3D CAD environment for more advanced mechanical design tasks. When a project involves both detailed 2D drawings and complex 3D models, I still need to work across different tools, which can add extra steps to the workflow.

I would also appreciate a smoother transition between 2D drawings and 3D models, particularly when managing drawing revisions and keeping technical documentation consistent. These are not necessarily deal-breakers, but improved integration and workflow continuity would make the overall design process more efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

DraftSight helps address the everyday need for reliable 2D technical drawings in mechanical engineering. Not every design task requires a complete 3D model, and having a dedicated 2D drafting tool makes it easier to create, review, modify, and share engineering drawings efficiently.

For mechanical design projects, accurate dimensions, clear annotations, organized layers, and compatibility with DWG files are important for communicating design intent and preparing technical documentation. DraftSight supports these tasks while complementing my 3D design workflow in SOLIDWORKS.

The main benefit is being able to handle routine drafting and drawing revisions without adding unnecessary complexity to the workflow. This helps keep engineering documentation organized, improves communication with collaborators, and allows me to focus more time on the actual design work. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What could be improved is, like, the different brush sizes and, like, the usability, you know, because, like, I have to select from the brush sizes, and, like, that could have been more intuitive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Sketchbook because it integrates well with my tablet and mobile devices, allowing for more creativity compared to other software. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The major factor is the 'bug splat". Despite its versions and performance have upgraded tremendously over the years, SketchUp is still prone to crashes when models become overly heavy with un-purged components.. Also, complex geometry cannot be easily created without third-party plugins. For a tool that started as free/affordable option, the recurring pro subscription pricing may feel steep for solo practitioners. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It creates a perfect bridge between 2D sketch and ideation and the final resulting 3D render. It can be seamlessly integrated into AutoCAD's workflow, AI's workflow and also as external exports for a cloud based softwares like Coohom. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I wish taking measurements was much easier. A more practical measurement tool on the same screen would be helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We are an R&D company, and Shapr3D helps us quickly turn our ideas into 3D designs and prototypes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The biggest frustration with Creo is definitely its notoriously steep learning curve and clunky, non-intuitive user interface. It’s extremely unforgiving when it comes to parent-child relationships, so modifying an early feature can easily trigger a cascading mess of failed references. On top of that, its high licensing costs and modular pricing make simple add-on features surprisingly expensive for smaller teams. While it’s an absolute powerhouse, the constant need for rigid precision and extra clicks can make everyday tasks feel overly tedious. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At its core, Creo solves the costly problem of design friction and translation errors when moving a product from initial concept to manufacturing. By unifying parametric modeling, real-time simulation, advanced surfacing, and CAM tools under one roof, it keeps entire engineering teams aligned on a single source of truth. For users, that means spending far less time fixing broken geometry or managing mismatched files, and far more time actually innovating. Ultimately, it gives you the confidence that your complex assemblies will fit and function perfectly before you ever pay for a physical prototype. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

When I work on large assemblies, Inventor crashes suddenly, and sometimes there's no mouse movement showing. The model feature in drawings for exploded views is not working well. These issues may be resolved by upgrading the software. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Inventor to create complex 3D parametric models and drawings, resolve issues in existing designs, and easily convert AutoCAD 2D drawings to 3D. Its versatility and interchangeability save me time and enhance productivity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some things that could be improved include change management. It would be useful to have a snapshot in time of the first initial revision of a design and then be able to compare new revisions, like rev one or rev two, with revisions stored in the database. Currently, all you can see is the live data, and you can't see previous revisions that were issued. There is also a learning curve; the initial setup can be complicated, though we have good knowledge in-house. Copying setups from one purchase to another could be made easier. It takes some skill, but once you know how to do it, it's quite straightforward. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Octave Forte 3D (Intergraph Smart 3D) for plant design, industrial architectural, foundations, piling, and structural to manage global projects. It provides a data-centric environment for live updates, intelligent modeling, which enables effective global collaboration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.