DevOps Software

Nothing as such. Segments and Release features can be simplified. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I'd point out two major problems that LD solves for my case,

1. We don't need to think about beta release to a small portion of customers. Just need to put the feature behind LD flag and control the flag from LD dashboard. That's it.

2. When we launch a new feature, we always put that feature behind LD flags. So that if something goes wrong, we don't need rollback anything in a hurry. Just toggle the LD flag by a single click. That would do the job. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't like that in the web version when I merge with another branch the changes are passed to both branches, this is usually counterproductive. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Previously we did not have a CD/CI with which we could deploy our projects automatically, with GitHub we were able to solve this. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. Sometime we were facing problem like intergration error.

2. There are some command facing issue like merge conflict.

3. We need some public repository on gitlab but unfortunatly it is not present in gitlab. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Before using GitLab, we had to manage our code directly on the server. However, this sometimes led to code being accidentally deleted, making recovery very difficult.

With GitLab, we can easily access all our code by using branches and previous commits. This is because GitLab is a version control tool, which is not only reliable but also user-friendly for DevOps teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

After using it for a couple of years now, the only thing that comes to mind is not having a history of changes for your workflows (if using the hosted yml file) option. Sure, you can always add the configuration file to your own repo, but in that case it can be a bit tiresome to update workflows, copy/paste the configuration into your yml file and pushing the changes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Bitrise is doing all the heavy lifting around making builds of our Android app, based on set triggers. Currently we have a couple of types of builds and conditions set when they need to be run, and Bitrise works like a charm. Not to mention actually pushing the builds to Firebase App Distribution for QA testing and finally creating releases on Google Play. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While AutoRABIT is feature-rich, the initial setup and implementation can be somewhat complex, especially for organizations with less technical expertise. The user interface, though functional, could benefit from a more modern and intuitive design. At times, the platform's performance can be sluggish, particularly when dealing with large data sets or complex environments using Dataloader. Lastly, the pricing might be a bit steep for smaller teams or organizations with limited budgets, making it more suitable for mid to large-sized enterprises. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AutoRABIT addresses several key challenges in our Salesforce development lifecycle. Firstly, it simplifies and automates the deployment process, reducing the risk of manual errors and significantly speeding up release cycles. This has enabled our team to deploy changes more frequently and with greater confidence. Secondly, AutoRABIT's version control system ensures that all changes are tracked, making it easier to manage code conflicts and rollbacks if necessary. The platform’s robust backup and recovery features protect our data, ensuring business continuity even in the event of unexpected issues. Overall, AutoRABIT has streamlined our DevOps operations, improved efficiency, and enhanced the security of our Salesforce environment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes they are slow to update the programming language versions in their OS images.

At one point the bump of a minor Ruby version took almost a week in their Ubuntu image and we couldn't upgrade our app without having the CI with the exact same Ruby version.

Also, lately they had some sort of bug in their platform that caused you to log out from Semaphore every day, and you thus you needed to log in back every morning. That was frustrating. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Every sreious engineer needs a CI/CD platform nowadays, you just can't live without one. Shipping code continuosly and getting feedback from the CI every time is incredibly valuable for us developers.

I would choose Semaphore for:

- it's ease of use

- it's good looking UI

- it's amazing customer care support Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I'm yet to come across any issues at all and therefore can't honestly find fault with the app. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Keeping track of changes and ensuring everything that gets sent to the production server is all built and ready is a pain without any tool like this and DeployHQ does it really well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Though Jenkins is definitely a useful and adaptable tool, there are some parts that I find problematic. Its high level of complexity in installation and configuration is the most significant disadvantage. The newbies might be confused by numerous options and plug-ins that are available in Jenkins. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Jenkins has played a very important role in solving several crucial challenges that are present in our SDLC mainly in the aspects of CI/CD. All of it was manual before Jenkins and we used to have many times human errors because the build and deployment was done manually, hence the release delay and an irregular build quality. Jenkins has changed this a lot by actually automating the chain and code integration and deployment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main downside comes not from Flosum itself, but from the architectural fact that it is in the end hosted on Salesforce platform itself, meaning that it also needs to adher all Salesforce platform limits, sometimes causing performance issues. However, solutions to these bottlenecks are already being developed afaik. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Very heterogeneous level of knowledge across the team.

Complex, multi-org architecture and release landscape.

Faster, but also more reliable and scalable deployment processes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

* Our complex test/staging/prod environment setup means that some of the dashboards are harder to follow, a way to create a custom dashboard would be great

* When using the approval system changes get applied the moment all approvals are granted, which has caught my team unaware, we know it now though (we are use to merge request workflows where the person submitting a change controls when it's applied) Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Where I work we have a two weekly release cycle, being able to launch feature behind splits and switch over at opportune moments is crucial. We would often have to hand roll this kind of stuff into our own app/conf/DB...etc. in the past. Now it's just a few clicks over on split and a few lines of code here and there Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There is nothing such that i disklike about the Vercel Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We used to use PHP and traditional web hosting panels like Plesk and cPanel, they were not scalable, vulnerable and lack support for latest web frameworks. Also licensing was expensive, after since we started migrationg our projects to Vercel, we have incereased quality, delivery time, security and scalability. It has become now the backbone of our IT infrastructure. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

GCB is a great product but it is very expensive for my many clients. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is useful when I have very specific needs and don't want to configure a Linux server by myself. It is also very useful in the development and testing stage so I can mainly focus on my software logic & structure. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some users find the learning curve to be steep when using Copado. While it simplifies many processes, it takestime to understand.

There are also occasional reports of glitches during query operations, particularly with storing queries, which can lead to deployments being less smooth than before. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Simplifies and automates metadata and deployments, reduces manual work for employees like us.

Enables collaboration for development and administrative teams through user story syncing and Git.

Decreases deployment time during deployment steps which reducing errors during releases.

Provides visibility into delivery processes with its value stream maps.

Overall, it Increases productiviy and collaboration, reduces errors and deployment times which makes it an overall fit for any devops engineer. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The docs are helpful and discuss a lot of different use cases for Buddy, although I do wish there was some examples that went through some best practices for individual devs or smaller teams with minimal experience setting up CI/CD or other pipelines. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I work with a small team and also have personal projects that I develop on the side. I wanted to setup automated testing and deployments for our team in order to cut down on launch time and mistakes. Using Buddy made it so simple to get up and running. The ui is beautiful and extremely intuitive and honestly a joy to use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Since it's a new product some bugs do appear but they are usually quickly fixed. It also can get a bit expensive when your usage grows. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Qovery is managing our cloud infrastructure for us allowing our development team to focus on our application. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Limited Scope Beyond Salesforce: Prodly DevOps is highly specialized for Salesforce environments. When we use multiple platforms or need a more comprehensive DevOps tool that supports various systems, Prodly may not meet all our needs. This specialization limits its applicability in broader DevOps ecosystems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. Complexity of Salesforce Metadata Migration

Salesforce environments have intricate metadata structures, and migrating these to the cloud can be challenging. Ensuring that all dependencies are correctly handled and that configurations remain consistent is critical but complex.

Benefit: Prodly DevOps automates the management and migration of Salesforce metadata. It ensures that all dependencies are properly addressed, reducing the risk of errors during migration. This streamlining of metadata management helps us to ensure a smooth and reliable migration process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Probably its complexity and the steep learning curve of it. While it offers extensive features, navigagating and setting up especially for new users or small businesses/organizations. I find the interface a bit cluttered and not as intuitive as they'd like. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

With Salesforce, we've made communication and operations between our company and bus companies way more efficient. The centralized portal that we have in Salesforce means no more back-and-forth emails, and everything's tracked in one place. Plus, it provides real-time updates so there's always full transparency and accountability. It helps us manage tasks and keeps all the data organized, so we (our company, bus companies and the client) can respond faster and stay on top of requests. It reduces errors and speeds things up. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One common issue is the slow execution of playbooks, especially when managing large-scale environments or executing tasks over many nodes. Since Ansible is agentless, it relies on SSH connections for communication, which can introduce delays, particularly if multiple servers are involved or if there are network latency issues. Another challenge is that playbooks written inefficiently, with redundant tasks or complex loops, can further contribute to performance bottlenecks. Additionally, Ansible's default execution model is single-threaded, meaning it processes tasks sequentially, which can slow down operations when dealing with a high volume of servers. Debugging and troubleshooting can also be tricky at times, as verbose logs are sometimes needed to pinpoint issues, leading to an increase in execution time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform solves critical challenges in IT automation, particularly in maintaining consistent and reliable environments across large-scale infrastructure. For your tasks, like running health scans and closing patching, it helps by automating repetitive, time-consuming processes, ensuring that patching and system checks are done efficiently and consistently across all servers.

One key benefit is the platform’s ability to orchestrate large-scale operations, reducing human error and ensuring that patches are applied uniformly. It also provides robust reporting and visibility into what tasks have been executed, making it easier to track patch compliance and health scan results. Additionally, its role-based access control (RBAC) ensures that only authorized personnel can make changes, improving security. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recently i came accross some issue in migration. when the tr failed to migrate we are migrating the TR manually , after migrating the TR manully the RT status is not changing to next stage and this is not frequent some time after manul migration it is changing the status not every time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Rev trac is solving Complex TR movement in single go. that is some time we need sequnce of TR movement into production , with the help of rev trac we can easily move the any complex TR with help of RT. and it is also solving time as it is autometing process once sign off done by owner it will autometically move to next. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are not many downsides but working with the shadow-DOM to customize components would probably be one. If you can avoid having too many customizations then this is the perfect product. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy out-of-the-box components is making it fast to develop and launch our app. Also being able to work on one code base and deploy to both iOS and Android apps is a huge benefit for us. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.