Automated Testing Software

Has always because I'm a business owner and I try to save money and make money I wish everything could be free but it can't be so there's not much to dislike Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's solving my biggest Dilemma on which software to stick with if I had operating system if I want to stick with iOS and Mac or if I want to stick with Google and Android so far it would seem that I would like to stick with the iMac and IOS operating systems Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In my opinion, the button that opens the browser console is in an unintuitive location, and it was hard to find it the first time.

If the user does not use the virtual device for about 2 or 3 minutes, he is automatically disconnected. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As a software tester, I use LambdaTest to display websites on various browsers and mobile devices. It works great for testing whether websites are responsive and whether all elements are displayed correctly on the most popular browsers and mobile devices. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Their zapier integration is limited. We were attempting to completely automate our beta process leveraging Launch Darkly + Hubspot forms. We failed to do so because LD's zapier integration doesn't support Segments. We are exploring leveraging their public API to build a custom solution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It has helped us do a few things better. 1. We manage alpha and beta releases more effectively. 2. We hav avoided massive outages by leveraging percentage based rollouts 3. It has helped us reduced the risk of launching large features or intiatives in our customer. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The learning curve can be a bit steep for beginners. Once you understand the core concepts like branching, merging, and resolving conflicts, it gets much more straightforward. Large binary files and large media content can slow repository performance and storage costs. Free private repositories are limited in features and size. If you have multiple private repositories, get ready to pay. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I would say the two main problems GitHub solves for me is code collaboration, and version control.

Code collaboration allows our team to track changes across our various projects. We have a clear history of our projects, so we don't waste time communicating through various other channels because we have one source we can all collaborate in.

Version control can be very complex, especially with large projects. GitHub simplifies this process by allowing you to create branches for experimental features. If something goes wrong with a code release, rolling back your code is easy. Since every code change is recorded, you can see every change. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The cost of the starter pack ain't cheap, haha! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It simplifies the process of building release-worthy copies of our Android and IOS apps. It also saves us time by allowing us to kickstart builds and go do something else. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The configuration of default runners is unknown - unless we run a particular command like uname Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Prior to using gitlab, i was building my code on a VM. when the VM went down or the network was down I was stuck. Also space was a constraint on VM with multple users using to store their files and build code.

moving to gitlab and having multiple projects eased this situation.

Also with the concept of branches I could have multiple flavors and options to achieve different functionality. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The application is only related to the test management if there's an automated tool installed then I don't think this would be helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The organization of thousands of test cases was one of the major issues we have faces during project deployments which has been solved by neat arrangement of test cases. This not only improves the efficiency but also solves the problem of dilemma among the testers. The ease of getting work done with fantastic test cases has also helped a lot. The way of organising the test cases in a well manner with reusable templates improves the efficiency and reduces problems. The seamless integration with jira or slack provides a great workflow. The analytics about test coverage and progress is amazing and very useful .The Creation detailed test cases using a WYSIWYG editor with rich-text formatting, allowing for clear and structured documentation helped a lot during system integration testing and UAT scenarios and will also be used in the future. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I didn't face any issues using TestFirst, but it doesn't have Mac support and some of our applications require to be tested on MacOS, so it's a limitation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use Jira-integrated TestFirst and link all our testing tasks with respective test cases. That helped to identify the areas lacking coverage because of the well-organized structure in TestFirst. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

A full regression run can take a long time to complete and review. This is mainly due to our product's complex setup, which can cause other areas not to behave as expected during testing. This limits the number of concurrent tests that can run, which increases run times. I believe this is less an issue with QA Wolf's product than with the complexity of our product. However, as QA Wolf learns more about our product setup, the tests are getting better and more stable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

QA Wolf solves the continualy problem with any software updates, introduced regression bugs. They are great at implementing useful tests that have proven to quickly catch introduced regression bugs as we continue to update and improve our product. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As with anything Metadata api based in Salesforce the system has to work around the complexities of the SalesForce object architecture. The data dictionary does take us a long way to getting past this however. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It gives us exact visibility into our customers Salesforce Orgs and helps us find the inflection points for our implementations. One example is an implementation that was hung up for 3 days on a problem, within 15 minutes of connecting sonar we worked past it. Its a lifesaver as is Brad and Kevin from their team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Honestly, so far, I haven’t come across anything I’d call a real downside. The tool does exactly what it promises, and we haven’t had any issues with it. Maybe as we continue to use it more, something might come up, but for now, everything works perfectly for our team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Qase helps us manage our testing tasks in a much more organized and efficient way. Before, we used to spend a lot of time tracking test assignments, but with Qase, everything is in one place. Creating, tracking, and analyzing test cases is super easy. What I love most is how it simplifies onboarding for new team members – they can quickly understand the system and start working right away. Plus, the Jira integration is a game-changer; everything syncs seamlessly. This platform saves us time and energy while boosting overall quality. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While postman is highly functional, it has few drawbacks. The learning curve for advance features like scripting in pre request features, while useful seem little overpriced, especially for small teams or solo developers.

The lack of offline capabalities for certain features also feels limiting. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One of the primary problems it solves is building, testing, and documenting API's so that developers don't have to juggle between multiple tools for testing , debugging and collaboration. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I'd want to see more updates in AI-driven test coverage analysis, but I can't think of anything significant at the moment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Our QA process no longer has bottlenecks thanks to ContextQA, which allows for quicker feedback loops and improved product delivery schedules. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

GCB is a great product but it is very expensive for my many clients. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is useful when I have very specific needs and don't want to configure a Linux server by myself. It is also very useful in the development and testing stage so I can mainly focus on my software logic & structure. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- sometimes the pipelines takes too long to execute / respond (maybe due to downtime from azure side). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- We use the azure pipelines to Deploy code in higher environments such as Test, Prod etc.

- Code promotion became easier and effortless due to DevOps pipelines. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As a frequent user of Testomat.io, I occasionally notice minor drawbacks. For instance, the search functionality for test cases and suites isn't always as precise as expected, sometimes failing to return the desired results. Additionally, there are slight UI lags when swiping through runs and their results, and also while editing a test case, deleting a step does not automatically update the numbering, requiring manual adjustments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Testomat.io streamlines our testing documentation, ensuring that all team members stay informed and up to date. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I'm yet to come across any issues at all and therefore can't honestly find fault with the app. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Keeping track of changes and ensuring everything that gets sent to the production server is all built and ready is a pain without any tool like this and DeployHQ does it really well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While AutoRABIT is feature-rich, the initial setup and implementation can be somewhat complex, especially for organizations with less technical expertise. The user interface, though functional, could benefit from a more modern and intuitive design. At times, the platform's performance can be sluggish, particularly when dealing with large data sets or complex environments using Dataloader. Lastly, the pricing might be a bit steep for smaller teams or organizations with limited budgets, making it more suitable for mid to large-sized enterprises. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AutoRABIT addresses several key challenges in our Salesforce development lifecycle. Firstly, it simplifies and automates the deployment process, reducing the risk of manual errors and significantly speeding up release cycles. This has enabled our team to deploy changes more frequently and with greater confidence. Secondly, AutoRABIT's version control system ensures that all changes are tracked, making it easier to manage code conflicts and rollbacks if necessary. The platform’s robust backup and recovery features protect our data, ensuring business continuity even in the event of unexpected issues. Overall, AutoRABIT has streamlined our DevOps operations, improved efficiency, and enhanced the security of our Salesforce environment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

However, the major disadvantage of Copado DevOps is that it is expensive and some small teams or companies may not be able to afford to use it. The resources necessary to leverage the platform to its full potential may not be in line with the company’s financial capabilities. Also unique is the fact that the platform is sometimes overcomplicated by its various features that can barely be managed without a team. This has sometimes led to our organization witnessing some form of unwarranted hold up accompanied by unnecessary price increment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are numerous issues that arise when it comes to the development and deployment of applications, and Copado DevOps has been helpful in their resolution. By continuously integrating and delivering, their manual work has been cut down and there are fewer chances of making mistakes in the deployment. This is has resulted into faster cycles and more credible software which has had an added advantage to our team since we are able to avoid spending considerable time solving problems of deployments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only real downside was our increased documentation requirements, but even then, Testlio has handled our testing needs with minimal to no documentation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Testlio allows us to scale our QA team up and down as releases happen. Being able to come back to overnight or weekend test runs with actionable issues for our devs is wonderful Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.