Principais Alternativas de Apache log4j Mais Bem Avaliadas
Avaliações 141 Apache log4j
Sentimento Geral da Revisão para Apache log4j
Entre para ver o sentimento das avaliações.
Depuração e filtro são bons recursos no log4j. É fácil encontrar problemas com o Log4j. Também ajuda quando há vários erros no produto. É fácil depurar usando log4j. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
Até agora, não vejo nada. Talvez mais e mais recursos com cada lançamento tornem o produto muito mais valioso. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
I have used it in my previous organization for log management of our J2EE applications. The best part is to be able to manage log levels based on java package path. It's a very powerful way to decide and dynamically log at the level based on the environment and need of the hour. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
In the earlier versions of log4j we had trouble being able to change the log levels dynamically at runtime without having to restart the server or the application. This was okay at lower environments. But, a big no for Production environment. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
A personalização. Com o Log4J, você pode escolher seus níveis de registro até a classe. A capacidade de depurar meu software mais facilmente apenas aumentando o registro torna a correção de bugs e erros muito mais fácil. Isso também me permite Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
Configuração complicada. Há muitas peças móveis com a configuração do Log4J, mas uma vez configurado, é fácil de usar. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
In my opinion, Apache log4j 2.0 is worth the upgrade- much better than the previous version. The plugin system has really helped me out. I have greatly enjoyed using this product. Performance is faster than ever! Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
The Async Appender isn't really for me- it's difficult and clunky to use and, in my opinion, isn't really worth it. I don't really want to add another logging framework to my daily tasks. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
Great tool for Apache server logs. Gives more detailed logging capability. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
There is a "native" implementation of the SLF4J API called Logback. Last year I was on a project in which we decided to switch from Log4J to Logback very late in the project, because Log4J locks logfiles and Logback does not (which means that on Windows, you can't delete a logfile while Log4J has it open; Logback doesn't have that problem). Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
The thing I like best about log4j is how easy and simple it is to use. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
Truthfully there is not anything I dislike, log4j is efficient and does what I need it to do. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
I like best how it helps necessary to get feedback about activity as well performance of servers Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
I really dont dislike anything specifically. It depends on the Apache configuration that you have Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
I have used log4j for several years. It's a good library highly configurable. It was part of all my libraries and java programms development. Used in conjunction with SLF4j is the best solution in the market. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
Unfortunately its development seems to be abandoned. Fortunately the same authors of log4j create a new library called logback, that it seems to be better than its predecessor. Análise coletada por e hospedada no G2.com.
