Ao avaliar as duas soluções, os avaliadores consideraram Docker mais fácil de usar e fazer negócios no geral. No entanto, os avaliadores preferiram a facilidade de administração com Google Artifact Registry. Os avaliadores determinaram que ambos os produtos são igualmente fáceis de configurar.
O primeiro contato que tive com esta ferramenta foi quando precisei puxar uma aplicação PostgreSQL legada. Foi super fácil encontrar o repositório oficial do PGSQL e ler o conteúdo do seu Dockerfile. Lá, pude encontrar o projeto no Github para o qual esse...
The automated image build tools are the main reason this would be worth paying for and they are quite poor. The lack features and development seems to be very slow. Some time back Docker bought up a company making something like this, so perhaps that's...
I have been using Google artifact registry past few years As a user, one of the key aspects I appreciate about Google Artifact Registry is its seamless integration with Google Cloud Platform. The ease of use and the simplicity in storing and managing...
Vendor lock-in is really bad what if I like to use different cloud services. Why limit services?
O primeiro contato que tive com esta ferramenta foi quando precisei puxar uma aplicação PostgreSQL legada. Foi super fácil encontrar o repositório oficial do PGSQL e ler o conteúdo do seu Dockerfile. Lá, pude encontrar o projeto no Github para o qual esse...
I have been using Google artifact registry past few years As a user, one of the key aspects I appreciate about Google Artifact Registry is its seamless integration with Google Cloud Platform. The ease of use and the simplicity in storing and managing...
The automated image build tools are the main reason this would be worth paying for and they are quite poor. The lack features and development seems to be very slow. Some time back Docker bought up a company making something like this, so perhaps that's...
Vendor lock-in is really bad what if I like to use different cloud services. Why limit services?